Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Enron’s Campaign Contributions, 1989-2001- Senate & House
Center For Responsive Politics ^ | January 2002 | N/A

Posted on 01/11/2002 7:20:07 AM PST by angkor

T H E   C E N T E R   F O R   R E S P O N S I V E   P O L I T I C S    T H E   C E N T E R   F O R   R E S P O N S I V E   P O L I T I C S 
Enron Contributions to Current Senators, 1989-2001* Enron Contributions to Current Members of the House of Representatives, 1989-2001*
Back to Alert Back to Alert
 
  Name Total
Name Total Ken Bentsen (D-Texas) $42,750
Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) $99,500 Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas) $38,000
Phil Gramm (R-Texas) $97,350 Joe L. Barton (R-Texas) $28,909
Conrad Burns (R-Mont) $23,200 Tom DeLay (R-Texas) $28,900
Charles E. Schumer (D-NY) $21,933 Martin Frost (D-Texas) $24,250
Michael D. Crapo (R-Idaho) $18,689 Charles W. Stenholm (D-Texas) $14,439
Christopher S. Bond (R-Mo) $18,500 Chet Edwards (D-Texas) $10,000
Gordon Smith (R-Ore) $18,000 Doug Bereuter (R-Neb) $10,000
Jeff Bingaman (D-NM) $14,124 Larry Combest (R-Texas) $9,820
Chuck Hagel (R-Neb) $13,331 John D. Dingell (D-Mich) $9,000
Pete V. Domenici (R-NM) $12,000 Edward J. Markey (D-Mass) $8,500
John B. Breaux (D-La) $11,100 Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore) $8,500
John McCain (R-Ariz) $9,500 Kevin Brady (R-Texas) $8,000
Robert F. Bennett (R-Utah) $8,053 Sam Johnson (R-Texas) $7,750
Pat Roberts (R-Kan) $8,000 Pete Sessions (R-Texas) $7,500
Bob Graham (D-Fla) $8,000 Dennis Hastert (R-Ill) $7,432
John Ensign (R-Nev) $7,500 Henry Bonilla (R-Texas) $7,250
Larry E. Craig (R-Idaho) $7,250 Bill Thomas (R-Calif) $7,000
Don Nickles (R-Okla) $7,000 David Dreier (R-Calif) $7,000
Craig Thomas (R-Wyo) $7,000 E. Clay Shaw Jr (R-Fla) $7,000
Tom Daschle (D-SD) $6,000 Ralph M. Hall (D-Texas) $6,900
Ben Nelson (D-Neb) $6,000 W. J. "Billy" Tauzin (R-La) $6,464
Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind) $5,750 Scott McInnis (R-Colo) $6,250
Kent Conrad (D-ND) $5,650 Michael G. Oxley (R-Ohio) $5,850
Michael B. Enzi (R-Wyo) $4,500 Dick Armey (R-Texas) $5,550
Ron Wyden (D-Ore) $4,000 Rick Boucher (D-Va) $5,332
Mitch McConnell (R-Ky) $4,000 Steve Largent (R-Okla) $5,123
George Allen (R-Va) $3,500 John Culberson (R-Texas) $5,000
Richard C. Shelby (R-Ala) $3,500 Jim McCrery (R-La) $5,000
Byron L. Dorgan (D-ND) $3,500 Barbara Cubin (R-Wyo) $5,000
Ernest F. Hollings (D-SC) $3,500 Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) $4,850
Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) $3,500 Gene Green (D-Texas) $4,750
Thad Cochran (R-Miss) $3,000 Richard A. Gephardt (D-Mo) $4,750
Ted Stevens (R-Alaska) $3,000 Heather A. Wilson (R-NM) $4,500
Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) $3,000 John L. Mica (R-Fla) $4,500
Sam Brownback (R-Kan) $2,750 Lee Terry (R-Neb) $4,500
James M. Inhofe (R-Okla) $2,550 Kay Granger (R-Texas) $4,500
James M. Jeffords (I-Vt) $2,500 Michael Bilirakis (R-Fla) $4,400
Mary L. Landrieu (D-La) $2,500 Sonny Callahan (R-Ala) $4,350
Frank H. Murkowski (R-Alaska) $2,500 Lamar Smith (R-Texas) $4,350
Jon L. Kyl (R-Ariz) $2,450 John M. Shimkus (R-Ill) $4,250
Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R-Colo) $2,300 Cass Ballenger (R-NC) $4,050
Max Baucus (D-Mont) $2,250 Cal Dooley (D-Calif) $4,000
Peter G. Fitzgerald (R-Ill) $2,038 Nick Lampson (D-Texas) $4,000
John W. Warner (R-Va) $2,000 J. C. Watts Jr (R-Okla) $3,750
Jesse Helms (R-NC) $2,000 Charles W. "Chip" Pickering Jr (R-Miss) $3,750
Christopher J. Dodd (D-Conn) $2,000 Jim Kolbe (R-Ariz) $3,700
Trent Lott (R-Miss) $2,000 Jim Nussle (R-Iowa) $3,700
Evan Bayh (D-Ind) $2,000 Jim Turner (D-Texas) $3,500
John D. Rockefeller IV (D-WVa) $2,000 Gary L. Ackerman (D-NY) $3,500
Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn) $2,000 Frank Pallone Jr (D-NJ) $3,500
Tim Johnson (D-SD) $1,756 Ed Royce (R-Calif) $3,500
Mike DeWine (R-Ohio) $1,500 Mark Foley (R-Fla) $3,500
Jon Corzine (D-NJ) $1,250 Charles B. Rangel (D-NY) $3,500
Deborah Ann Stabenow (D-Mich) $1,000 Joe Skeen (R-NM) $3,500
Harry Reid (D-Nev) $1,000 Greg Walden (R-Ore) $3,500
Strom Thurmond (R-SC) $1,000 Max Sandlin (D-Texas) $3,000
Robert C. Byrd (D-WVa) $1,000 Jerry Lewis (R-Calif) $3,000
Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) $1,000 Vito J. Fossella (R-NY) $3,000
Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md) $1,000 David R. Obey (D-Wis) $3,000
Judd Gregg (R-NH) $1,000 William M. "Mac" Thornberry (R-Texas) $3,000
Bill Nelson (D-Fla) $1,000 Roy Blunt (R-Mo) $2,500
Wayne Allard (R-Colo) $1,000 Philip M. Crane (R-Ill) $2,500
Robert C. Smith (R-NH) $1,000 Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla) $2,500
Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass) $1,000 Bud Cramer (D-Ala) $2,500
Zell Miller (D-Ga) $1,000 Amo Houghton (R-NY) $2,500
Tim Hutchinson (R-Ark) $1,000 Jennifer Dunn (R-Wash) $2,500
Robert G. Torricelli (D-NJ) $1,000 Mac Collins (R-Ga) $2,500
Jean Carnahan (D-Mo) $1,000 Cliff Stearns (R-Fla) $2,300
Rick Santorum (R-Pa) $1,000 David Wu (D-Ore) $2,250
Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) $950 Wes Watkins (R-Okla) $2,250
Jim Bunning (R-Ky) $769 Frank D. Lucas (R-Okla) $2,000
  Adam Smith (D-Wash) $2,000
 *Based on FEC data downloaded 11/1/01. Benjamin A. Gilman (R-NY) $2,000
Senators not on this list received no Enron contributions. Charles Bass (R-NH) $2,000
Earl Pomeroy (D-ND) $2,000
Robert T. Matsui (D-Calif) $2,000
John Thune (R-SD) $2,000
Chris John (D-La) $2,000
Deborah Pryce (R-Ohio) $2,000
Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan) $2,000
Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) $2,000
Peter Deutsch (D-Fla) $2,000
Greg Ganske (R-Iowa) $2,000
Edward Whitfield (R-Ky) $2,000
Darlene Hooley (D-Ore) $1,950
David L. Hobson (R-Ohio) $1,850
Peter A. DeFazio (D-Ore) $1,750
Don Young (R-Alaska) $1,600
William P. "Bill" Luther (D-Minn) $1,503
Jim Davis (D-Fla) $1,500
Harold Rogers (R-Ky) $1,500
Anthony Weiner (D-NY) $1,500
J. D. Hayworth (R-Ariz) $1,500
Charlie Norwood (R-Ga) $1,500
Jerry Weller (R-Ill) $1,500
George P. Radanovich (R-Calif) $1,500
Ed Bryant (R-Tenn) $1,500
Bart Gordon (D-Tenn) $1,500
Ken Calvert (R-Calif) $1,500
Mark Green (R-Wis) $1,500
C. W. Bill Young (R-Fla) $1,500
Jim Ramstad (R-Minn) $1,350
Jerry Moran (R-Kan) $1,250
Jim Ryun (R-Kan) $1,250
Porter J. Goss (R-Fla) $1,100
Gary A. Condit (D-Calif) $1,041
James L. Oberstar (D-Minn) $1,000
Constance A. Morella (R-Md) $1,000
Solomon P. Ortiz (D-Texas) $1,000
Richard M. Burr (R-NC) $1,000
John Shadegg (R-Ariz) $1,000
James P. Moran (D-Va) $1,000
Thomas M. Davis III (R-Va) $1,000
Nancy L. Johnson (R-Conn) $1,000
J. Randy Forbes (R-Va) $1,000
Howard Coble (R-NC) $1,000
Ric Keller (R-Fla) $1,000
Gil Gutknecht (R-Minn) $1,000
Rod R. Blagojevich (D-Ill) $1,000
Bobby L. Rush (D-Ill) $1,000
Steve Buyer (R-Ind) $1,000
Tim Roemer (D-Ind) $1,000
Roger Wicker (R-Miss) $1,000
James C. Greenwood (R-Pa) $1,000
Patrick J. Tiberi (R-Ohio) $1,000
Anne Northup (R-Ky) $1,000
John P. Murtha (D-Pa) $1,000
Norm Dicks (D-Wash) $1,000
Jo Ann Emerson (R-Mo) $900
Tom Latham (R-Iowa) $800
John E. Sununu (R-NH) $800
Richard H. Baker (R-La) $800
Curt Weldon (R-Pa) $750
Steven C. LaTourette (R-Ohio) $550
David Vitter (R-La) $500
Michael N. Castle (R-Del) $500
Ellen O. Tauscher (D-Calif) $500
Tom Sawyer (D-Ohio) $500
Rick Larsen (D-Wash) $500
Jim McDermott (D-Wash) $500
Melissa A. Hart (R-Pa) $500
Kenny Hulshof (R-Mo) $500
Xavier Becerra (D-Calif) $500
Ciro D. Rodriguez (D-Texas) $500
George Nethercutt (R-Wash) $500
Dan Miller (R-Fla) $500
Donald Manzullo (R-Ill) $500
Tom Petri (R-Wis) $500
Joe Knollenberg (R-Mich) $500
Baron P. Hill (D-Ind) $500
Ted Strickland (D-Ohio) $500
Steve Chabot (R-Ohio) $500
John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) $500
Karen McCarthy (D-Mo) $500
John Tanner (D-Tenn) $500
Dave Weldon (R-Fla) $500
Robert Wexler (D-Fla) $500
Lincoln Diaz-Balart (R-Fla) $500
Mary Bono (R-Calif) $500
Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga) $500
Ron Paul (R-Texas) $500
Nick J. Rahall II (D-WVa) $500
Frank R. Wolf (R-Va) $500
Bob Ney (R-Ohio) $500
Robert Menendez (D-NJ) $500
Cynthia A. McKinney (D-Ga) $500
William J. Jefferson (D-La) $500
Duncan Hunter (R-Calif) $500
Brad Sherman (D-Calif) $500
Jane Harman (D-Calif) $500
Christopher B. Cannon (R-Utah) $500
James V. Hansen (R-Utah) $500
Silvestre Reyes (D-Texas) $500
Edolphus Towns (D-NY) $500
Paul E. Kanjorski (D-Pa) $500
Ernest Istook (R-Okla) $500
Charlie Gonzalez (D-Texas) $500
Joel Hefley (R-Colo) $350
  Peter T. King (R-NY) $300
  Wally Herger (R-Calif) $300
  Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas) $250
  Eric Cantor (R-Va) $250
  Jesse Jackson Jr (D-Ill) $250
  Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif) $250
  Brian Baird (D-Wash) $250
  Albert R. Wynn (D-Md) $125
   
  *Based on FEC data downloaded 11/1/01.
  Members not on this list received no Enron contributions.
 
 
       


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: condidit; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last
To: Miss Interpretate
almost every company gives to both parties, but the huge disparity tells you who enron was in bed with. check post 14, bush received 10 times more than gore.

At least Enron is an American company run by American citizens. Your buddies Clinton and Gore have to resort to selling secrets to the Communist Chinese to raise money. Kenneth Lay doesn't have the luxury of hiding out in Asia.

61 posted on 01/11/2002 8:38:57 AM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Miss Interpretate
John Ashcroft had to recuse himself from the investigation! Do you question this fact? That doesn't seem suspicious to you? What does it take?

You’re a retard. Recusing oneself does not indicate culpability. And the fact that he did it so quickly is indicative of his self-assurance that he did nothing wrong.

What a contrast to that drunken, shakey, child murdering, corrupt bull dyke Attorney General who preceeded him. She did nothing but insert herself as a roadblock into any and all investigations. The truth would have destroyed her.

She was the consigleire for the entire mob of corrupt Clinton cronies.

62 posted on 01/11/2002 8:40:24 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Miss Interpretate
Ashcroft did so because Enron gave him campaign contributions last year. I'll wait for Daschle and Gephardt and Hildebeast to do the same...

(zzzzzzz... zzzzzzzz... wake me up when this happens)

63 posted on 01/11/2002 8:40:24 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #64 Removed by Moderator

To: Miss Interpretate
The idea that democrats are equally culpable in this enron scandal is a pretty desperate stretch for republicans. enron gave over 70% to republicans since 1989. It's not even close. The fact that enron gave a little to democrats is just them trying to cover their a$$e$, like their cynical attempt to give to democrats right before they went under.

so now CONservatives can say "see, dems are guilty too!"

Guilty of what? IF Enron executives or accountants broke the law, they should go to jail. What exactly would political candidates they contributed to have to do with them breaking the law?

nice try. clinton might have met with lay once or twice, or played golf with them--but it's nothing compared to the bush white house, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of enron.

How much of a "wholly owned subsidiary", is it when the White House let them go bankrupt when they asked for help? I mean, if Enron had Bush in their back pocket, why didn't Bush do something, anything to help them out. Further, since there is no quid pro quo, how has anything that Bush has done in regard to Enron been illegal? I mean, teachers unions overwhelmingly support democrats, but last time there was a scandal about where the dues were going, I don't recall republicans whipping out the list of polititians who had been contributed to by that union and accuse them of being an accessory. What law, exactly, did any of the polititians on the list(Republicans or Democrats) break?

65 posted on 01/11/2002 8:48:20 AM PST by The Enlightener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Comment #66 Removed by Moderator

To: dead
Isn't great to have an honorable AG once again? Ashcroft recused himself because Enron was one of his contributors.

Think what Reno would have done if the shem were in there right now.
67 posted on 01/11/2002 8:49:01 AM PST by KingPin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Miss Interpretate
We don't ban people for having dissenting opinions here. Only the subhuman neanderthals at DU do that. Welcome to FR. Are you RoxanneJ?
68 posted on 01/11/2002 8:49:03 AM PST by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
I hope this cost this poor excuse for a House Rep. She is a real nut case from what I hear.
69 posted on 01/11/2002 8:50:08 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Miss Interpretate
Read the numbers and stop whining. Your temper tantrum is embarrassing.
70 posted on 01/11/2002 8:51:09 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Miss Interpretate
John Ashcroft had to recuse himself from the investigation!

Yes? And why did he do that? Did he do that because he accepted campaign contributions? Yes. Was that the correct thing to do? Yes? And? What is your point?

Do you question this fact? That doesn't seem suspicious to you? What does it take?

And? What is your point?

Do you question the fact that enron was bush's biggest campaign contributor? This doesn't mean anything to you? The administration is loaded with former enron officials and stockholders! How many of them were able to cash out and leave the employees holding the bag? What did they know, and when did they know it?

Yes, they were his biggest campaign contributor. And? Employees holding the bag? Hpw? How did that happen? And the other things you mention will come out, but you will be dissapointed with the results. This is so going to backlash on the Dems if they pursue this in the manner they plan on doing.

Cheney admitted that he and his staff had at least six meetings with enron officials. You think that the enron people cared about anything but enriching themselves?

And? He had six meetings. I believe those meetings, depending on what the situation was, and I do not know the particulars of this, should perhaps have been public. I'll leave it to others to discuss that.

You should take note that many former Clinton and Gore officials are lobbyists for Enron. That includes Jack Quinn and and a host of others. Does that bother you? Repubs do not deny taking accpeting campign contributions from Enron and Dems are trying to run from the fact they did, so that they can go after GW. Right?

The fact that enron officials are now bringing their bad business practices to the rest of the country doesn't bother you? i guess not, because Clinton's zipper isn't implicated. If Clinton was so good for enron, then enron certainly has a funny way of showing its gratitude.

Right. When the facts escape you, bring up Clinton's zipper. I do not like Enron's business practices and I do not like the way Arthur Anderson appears to have been clueless. I certainly hope Sen Lieberman has nothing to do with the discussion concerning Enron accounting practices and/or Arthur Anderson, as he was given political contributions from Arthur Anderson. Right?

71 posted on 01/11/2002 8:53:05 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

Comment #72 Removed by Moderator

To: Miss Interpretate
The fact that Ashcroft had to recuse himself would make most people think that a special prosecutor is warranted in the enron case, but liAri Flusher says that we don't need any more endless, partisan-motivated witch hunts.

Your logic is so incredibly faulty. Please go back over to DU and try to make a somewhat more compelling argument.

73 posted on 01/11/2002 8:54:44 AM PST by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Ridin' Shotgun
Many thanks.
74 posted on 01/11/2002 8:57:57 AM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Miss Interpretate
You really are an egghead. The investigations didn't "turn up anything" because Reno ran interference for the Klintoon criminal mob machine. Like I said, get your facts straight missy.
75 posted on 01/11/2002 9:00:02 AM PST by itsinthebag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Miss Interpretate
What is open secrets? Another one of those sites professing to speak the truth. The truth is Enron was run by crooks; just like the people who sued the tobacco companies for the children. Yeah right....These people are loan sharks and crooks. The lottery in California is another example. Said they were going to use some of the money for education. Another yeah...right. Again; they did not. This country is being ruined by crooks and con artists with all their money scams which seem to be working and you're worried about who played golf with Enron more. I suggest you read a book called "The Informant"; an FBI coverup about Archer, Daniel Midland. This is a blueprint of how they are doing business today. And if I had to decide who was the con artist of Presidents and First Ladies; it would be Billy and Hilly, hands down.
76 posted on 01/11/2002 9:03:01 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Fury; Miss Interpretate
Cheney meetings did you say....... Well lets see.

Matalin Details Cheney-Enron Meetings

.

Matalin disputed claims that the administration had tried to hide its meetings with Enron executives, explaining, "Dick Cheney said in May on PBS that he had met with (Enron CEO) Ken Lay and had a 20-minute meeting with him."

"I remember that meeting very well," the senior White House advisor told Imus. "(Lay) got into the specifics of electricity competition and Cheney's not an expert on that and (Lay) was deferred to the staff. The subsequent meetings were not with the (Energy) Task Force or any Cabinet members - (it was) Enron staff guys with our staff guys.".....

One of the "so-called meetings," said Matalin, "was our head staff guy was giving a presentation to 25 companies and an Enron representative was there. Another so-called meeting was two guys came to talk to the staff about the progress of the energy report and the Enron guy never said anything.

Matalin said Cheney himself had only met with Mr. Lay twice. "He met with him, as he said on PBS, once on April 17 for 20 minutes. And then in June, he and I and the chief of staff, Scooter Libby.... went to an American Enterprise Institute world forum in Beaver Creek. It was one of these think tank things and there were 600 people there and Ken Lay was there.

"So we put that down as a meeting, which I think hardly qualifies," Matalin said. "I think we over-disclosed here."

On the question on whether contacts between Enron and Bush officials in the end benefited the energy giant, Matalin noted that the Bush-Cheney energy plan contained 178 recommendations to improve U.S. energy production and "not one - nada, zip, zero - was in there for Enron or Ken Lay."

. Yep them meetings were very productive for Enron... drove them right into bankruptcy....
77 posted on 01/11/2002 9:03:27 AM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Miss Interpretate
We had a special prosecutor who spent several years and millions of dollars investigating every "scandal" that conservatives told him to investigate--no matter how un-related to whitewater. The best you could come up with was consentual sex between adults.

Obviously you missed the part about purjury under oath.

In fact, we had several special prosecutors investigating Clinton officials, most of which came up empty--but not after wasting millions more of taxpayers' money, and ruining the lives of many innocent people.

Actually, many people in the Clinton administration were indicted for actual crimes, and some went to jail for a long time. How convenient you choose to forget about them.

The fact that Ashcroft had to recuse himself would make most people think that a special prosecutor is warranted in the enron case, but liAri Flusher says that we don't need any more endless, partisan-motivated witch hunts.

Maybe you are confused about the meaning of "recuse?" I suggest you look it up, since if Ashcroft had not recused himself he would be immendiately called compromised by partisan polititians.

Am I missing something here? You argued above that all the investigations into Clinton were pointless, and wasted lots of money, but now you are calling for more of the same, since it's against someone you don't like? I mean, if you really believed all the Clinton scandal investigations to be a waste of money, then why aren't you against starting the same process over with the new president? Cut out all investigation and give us a tax cut(okay, if you want, and I strongly suspect you do, use the money to pay down the National Debt).

Oops, he just admitted the truth about the Clinton investigations

Again, if that is what you believe, they why are you proposing starting the whole mess over again with a new president? Can't we all just stop investigating until some real obvious, unspinnable sign of wrongdoing occurs?

78 posted on 01/11/2002 9:05:47 AM PST by The Enlightener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Miss Interpretate
only because they ban people whenever they try to debate the other side of the issues, or dare to criticize bu$h.

Izzat right?

Well, I'm right proud of the fact that I have been banned NINE, that's right - 9 - times on your precious Dumbocrat Underglass, for what?

Why, for daring to attempt to post accurate and well-sourced material about Clintoon and Albore, for having the temerity to even question the source of some of the bullshit you idiots spew over there, and once, for even daring to ask why you crapbags get so upset over Hildebeast being called Hildebeast, when you all refer to Laura Bush as "pickles". (Whatever the hell that means.)

Go back from whence you came, liberal.

You people disgust me, your feet stink, your mama dresses you funny and I know you don't love Jesus.

79 posted on 01/11/2002 9:08:27 AM PST by OldSmaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Fury
Really? So can we assume that Enron was "in bed with" Ken Bentsen and Sheila Jackson Lee because they gave these two Dem Congress"people" more money than all other House members from 1989-1991? Or does that only work for folks that run for President?

No. You can assume Enron was "in bed with" the Government.

You can also assume Enron, unlike the average Freeper, had the insight to know there is no difference between the two parties.

80 posted on 01/11/2002 9:10:10 AM PST by backup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson