Replies

If evolution is incorrect, it is yet unknown what the better paradigm is. Creation science is not the only suggested alternative. Offering evidence for the alternative is what constitutes good theory-making, not taking potshots at the existing paradigm.

Without commenting on the article itself, I have a question for you based on your post. If evolution is incorrect, what other paradigm can you suggest, other than creation? If there is a third paradigm, I am unaware of it. If there is not third paradigm, wouldn't a reasonable person have to conclude that for the time being, creation is the best scientific model?

Creation is NOT a scientific model, it is a myth, put together by some ancient medicine man to explain how we came to be. They had no facts, they had no proof, so they made something up that made a kind of sense.

Evolution on the other hand IS a scientific theory that has many FACTS to back it up. As a matter of fact the facts are so substantial, that Evolution looks to be indeed what happened and is happening.