Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox’s Storm Clouds
Media Research Center ^ | 1/10/02 | L. Brent Bozell III

Posted on 01/10/2002 8:16:03 AM PST by Jean S

Should conservatives start worrying about the Fox News Channel?

Throughout its five years on the air, the Fox News Channel has been singled out by the media elite as uniquely biased to the right. Right off the bat the network became suspect when Roger Ailes was hired to run it. He worked for Nixon and the elder George Bush, countless establishment media types huffed, conveniently overlooking that the resumes of the Kennedy and McGovern and Gene McCarthy groupies could paper entire walls at the rest of the networks.

Not much intimidates Ailes, and this didn’t either. He launched his network with a full broadside at the competition by introducing the “We Report, You Decide” and “Fair and Balanced” slogans. This merely confirmed the suspicions of the liberal media who sneered at such sophomoric nonsense. To the consciousness-raisers who cut their teeth on civil rights protests and Vietnam, these were mantras and mottos that belonged in a museum, not bouncing off a satellite dish. 

Well, they’re not laughing anymore. Fox has left MSNBC and CNBC in the dust while pulling virtually even with CNN. Fox did it with hard work, gutsy journalists, and a refreshing outlook on the world.

So why are the folks at Fox now messing with that formula? Recent hires indicate a new direction: glitzy star power over quality. Conservatives are concerned, and Fox had better be careful.

First, Fox grabbed the glamorous, and historically liberal Paula Zahn away from CBS. Those conservatives who were wary of this move (like me) were pleasantly surprised when she delivered a truly fair and balanced product; indeed, some were actually saddened (me again) when she was lured away by CNN. 

Then Fox hired Geraldo Rivera away from CNBC. Much bigger alarm bells went off this time. Geraldo?. And this time the suspicions about this “reporter” were justified. Ultra-patriotic though he was (a nice twist for the aging hippie, that), within weeks Geraldo was embarrassing his new bosses. The Baltimore Sun's David Folkenflik exposed that a Rivera report from the "hallowed ground" where U.S. soldiers fell in a friendly-fire incident was nowhere near where Geraldo was standing. “War correspondent” Geraldo was recalled from the war before Christmas. What Fox will do with him now – or he will do with Fox – is uncertain.

Now Fox has recruited CNN host Greta Van Susteren, counted by most as a counter-coup for CNN stealing Fox's Paula Zahn. Greta will fill Zahn's old hour-long slot at 10 PM. I can tell you there is most definitely displeasure in Conservativeland over this move.

Lest anyone forget, Greta was, like Geraldo, a full-time Clinton cheerleader during that crazy year of 1998. Within weeks of the Monica Lewinsky revelations, she was anchoring a two-hour special ripping into Ken Starr for his abuses of power and his suspect "religious and Republican roots." (Which was rich coming from Greta, who never wants anyone to talk about her fervent belief in Scientology.)

By May of that year, she was sitting next to Hillary Clinton at a White House state dinner. She argued that Bill Clinton should fight any attempts to make him testify and take it all the way to the Supreme Court. Her trial-lawyer husband, John Coale, represented former Kathleen Willey buddy Julie Hiatt Steele in her attempts to belittle Starr as a vicious, out-of-control prosecutor. Coale had also given thousands of dollars that year to the budding Gore campaign and the Democratic National Committee.

What's going on here? Is Ailes capitulating to the barrage of liberal accusations and trying to make his network look more like the rest of the major media? I doubt it. This man is too much the warrior to be cowed by the opposition, especially now when his gamelan is working so well.

Is he trying to tweak his competitors and drive up the ratings appeal of Fox by hiring away their big-name stars? Maybe that’s the answer, but if it is, it is worrisome.

There’s an underlying message here, one conservatives have heard before, unfortunately, and it is this: Conservatives have nowhere else to go and will just have to accept this broadening of the message. It had miserable results in GOP politics and could have similar consequences with Fox.

“Nowhere else to go” overlooks one very important player in this drama: CNN capo di capi Jamie Kellner. Call him a dyed-in-the-wool liberal Democrat all you want, but this man is first and foremost a hardnosed businessman. If he has accepted (and who cares whether he says so or not publicly) that a major reason for CNN’s ratings free-fall is the loss of its conservative viewers, he will do what it takes to regain them. In truth, there are plenty of signs at CNN that is intent on doing just that.

Fox is going to have to be careful. The biggest mistake it could make is to take its conservative audience for granted.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: JeanS
Fox is going to have to be careful. The biggest mistake it could make is to take its conservative audience for granted.

Furrowed brow-Bump.

41 posted on 01/10/2002 10:28:07 AM PST by DoctorMichael
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Jeez, talk about throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

If you want a professional, balanced news presentation with a solid right-winger you'll watch Brit Hume or Snow.

If you like populist ranting, you'll watch O'Reilly.

A lot of people like Hannity (I don't know why) -- so watch him!

Turn the damned thing off the rest of the time. Too many people here have "boycott syndrome".

42 posted on 01/10/2002 10:32:49 AM PST by CraigH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
I quit watching after they hired Greta. Whoraldo was one thing, she was the nail in the coffin.

I'd rather watch the reruns of Buffy the Vampire Slayer on FX on the west coast than gag through and hour of Greta.

Fox lost a ton of credibility when they hired Jerry Rivers (a.k.a. Geraldo). They lost a ton more with this Clinton whore.

43 posted on 01/10/2002 10:42:41 AM PST by Euro-American Scum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
Did you keep it on to see the homeless segment?

No, sorry I missed it, 15 seconds of the Whoreraldo/Hannity love fest and FOX was banned for the remainder of the evening at our house.

44 posted on 01/10/2002 11:05:27 AM PST by putupon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: putupon
Same thing with O'Reilly when he puts the likes of Al Sharpton up there, giving the goon credibility; this pisses me off, to put it bluntly.
45 posted on 01/10/2002 11:13:54 AM PST by ErnBatavia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #46 Removed by Moderator

To: Mat_Helm
I agree with you 100%
47 posted on 01/10/2002 11:25:46 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: GroovyGuru
check out john gibson weekdays at 5 on fox, i think you'll like him. (he's on vacation this week and will return on monday).
49 posted on 01/10/2002 12:28:26 PM PST by contessa machiaveli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: GraniteStateConservative
Sometimes I think that we conservatives react too quickly when people change one little thing in our world.

As long as Brit Hume is senior editor-in-chief of the news section they've got me! Greta Van Cistern doesn't interest me, therefore I won't watch her. Roger and all the boys in management have proven, time and time again, they they keep a sharp eye on the ratings for individual programs. If people don't like this flaming liberal witch....DON'T WATCH HER! Roger will find out how we feel soon enough.

Besides, Roger and Brit may have much to say as to who her quests are. Let's hope they call on Alan Keyes for her first quest. The good Doctor would chew this broad up and spit her out in a New York minute. This is what Greta has in store for her, and I think it would be great!

51 posted on 01/10/2002 1:06:08 PM PST by timydnuc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Roger Ailes, listen up.

We have remote controls in our hands and WE KNOW HOW TO USE THEM!

52 posted on 01/10/2002 2:13:29 PM PST by Humidston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Fox's news spin on ERON & their contributions to the GOP last night was virtually indistinguishable from ABC's or CNN's.

Impossible. Fox is the only network that made mention of the democraps benefitting from Enron contributions while NBC's Brian Williams called it Bush's Whitewater. ABC's Petuh Jennings said "Enron's connections to the Bush administration, are wide and deep" and last, but certainly not least, CBS Marketwatch.com's David Callway warned that "The Enron debacle won't be President Bush's Whitewater. It will be much worse". Don't have a quote from Aaron Brown of CNN who was salivating before I hit the mute button.

53 posted on 01/12/2002 12:46:00 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Geraldo is the reason God created the "off" button on the TV remote control. God is good.
54 posted on 01/12/2002 12:57:17 PM PST by Random Access
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Yes, they had better be careful because we still have radio to get our news - we are not dependent upon FOX.
55 posted on 01/12/2002 1:43:32 PM PST by Sueann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
I was referring to Fox's top-of the hour "headline news", not the extended pieces of reporting that guys like Carl Cameron, etc. do. or the opinions shows.

The bit I heard mentioned only that Bush had received campaign donations from Enron. Unfortunately, thats as much as many people will hear on the subject.

56 posted on 01/14/2002 5:51:05 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
Good morning skeeter. The bit I heard mentioned only that Bush had received campaign donations from Enron That may have been then but things look brighter now -- even CNN reporting the dems involvement (even if in a whisper).
57 posted on 01/14/2002 6:21:47 AM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson