Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal Immigrants
New York Times ^

Posted on 01/09/2002 5:00:20 PM PST by RCW2001



January 9, 2002

White House Shifts on Welfare Law; Food Stamps for Legal Immigrants

By ROBERT PEAR

WASHINGTON, Jan. 9 — The Bush administration proposed today to restore food stamps to legal immigrants, whose eligibility for benefits was severely restricted by the 1996 welfare law.

The White House said that in the budget President Bush will send to Congress in early February, at least 363,000 people would qualify for food stamps under a proposal that would cost the federal government $2.1 billion over 10 years.

The proposal, or something like it, has an excellent chance of becoming law. The Senate is considering such changes as part of a far-reaching bill to reauthorize farm and nutrition programs.

The welfare bill passed by Congress and signed by President Bill Clinton in 1996 made immigrants ineligible for food stamps and many other forms of assistance financed with federal money. Supporters of the ban, most of them Republicans, argued that federal benefits drew immigrants to the United States and then discouraged their work effort after they got here.

But today, with the country in a recession that is hurting immigrants, and fighting a war on terrorism that has targeted some immigrants, Mr. Bush is looking for ways to show his commitment to them as well as to addressing domestic problems — a transition his father failed to make effectively a decade ago after the Persian Gulf war. Moreover, many of those who would benefit from the food stamps are Hispanic Americans, whom the White House is ardently courting.

As Mr. Clinton did as well, President Bush is selectively disclosing parts of his budget in advance — specifically, those proposals likely to win political support for the president.

Antihunger groups and Hispanic groups were enthusiastic about Mr. Bush's proposal, without suggesting any ulterior motive.

"This is an enormous step forward, for which the president should be congratulated," said Cecilia Munoz, vice president of the National Council of La Raza, a Latino civil rights group. "Mr. Bush did not speak out on this in the presidential campaign, and he had not done so since he assumed office."

As governor of Texas and as president, Mr. Bush has taken pride in his good relations with Hispanic Americans, although the Republican Party is split on how aggressively to go after Hispanic voters.

Some Republicans have alienated Hispanic voters with proposals for a restrictionist immigration policy. But Karl Rove, the president's senior political adviser, said earlier this year that capturing a bigger share of Hispanic voters was "our mission and our goal" and would require assiduous work by "all of us in every way."

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, the federal government has detained more than 1,100 noncitizens for questioning and has stepped up enforcement of the immigration laws. Mr. Bush has insisted that he is waging war on terrorists, not immigrants, and his food stamp proposal can be cited to support that claim.

James D. Weill, president of the Food Research and Action Center, an antihunger group, said: "It's really positive that the administration wants to extend food stamp benefits to this group of legal immigrants. We are delighted the administration is supporting this."

The economy is much worse now than in 1996, when Mr. Clinton signed the welfare bill. "Immigrants have been hit hard by the economic downturn," Ms. Munoz said, "and there's no safety net for those who arrived after 1996."

Welfare and food stamp rolls have plummeted since 1996, and members of Congress express much less concern now about being overwhelmed with the programs' cost, even though budget surpluses have evaporated and Mr. Bush has emphasized holding down costs. Also, advocates for immigrants have made some progress on Capitol Hill by appealing to the American sense of justice.

"This will restore justice to people who work hard, pay taxes and play an incredibly important role in our economy," Ms. Munoz said. "It is unreasonable for somebody who works hard and is laid off to have no access to food for his family."



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-265 next last
To: codeword
And every conservative vote he loses will be critical to his re-election. I may be busy shopping for a third party candidate and miss voting entirely that day.
241 posted on 01/10/2002 11:12:10 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
There is one thing that might be effective in getting there attention and wouldn't prevent you from voting for them if you felt you had to.  That is party registration.  They watch that pretty closely I think.  If they had a sudden mass exodus from the republican registration rolls it might sink into their thick skulls that all is not well.

I'm not suggesting registering democrat, just register uncommitted or third party.  If we could get enough to do that it would shake them up I think.

WarHawk42

242 posted on 01/10/2002 11:28:29 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

Comment #243 Removed by Moderator

To: jamesbond
Filipinos who are legal U.S. residents but not citizens make up 70 percent of the 1,200 screeners at San Francisco International Airport. Hundreds more at San Jose and Oakland airports stand to lose their jobs. Nationwide, officials estimate 25 percent of all airport screeners will be fired next year for not being citizens. ``There's no rational basis for it; it's discriminatory,'' Rodis said.

Source

WarHawk42

244 posted on 01/10/2002 11:44:13 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: jamesbond
December 12, 2001 -- SALT LAKE CITY - Just two
 months before the Winter Olympics, 69 people have been
 indicted on federal charges of using false information to get
 jobs at Salt Lake International Airport, prosecutors said
 yesterday.

 U.S. Attorney Paul Warner said most of the 69 are
 accused of lying to get badges allowing them into secure
 areas - but he said that there's no evidence that any of them
 have terrorist connections.

 The 2002 Winter Olympics begin in Salt Lake City on Feb.
 8.

 Sixty-one of those indicted are charged with using fake
 documents to get security badges. Investigators said those
 workers are in the country illegally, and are mostly from
 Latin America.

I don't know what percentage that is but it is 61 illegal immigrants.

Source

WarHawk42

245 posted on 01/10/2002 11:57:41 PM PST by WarHawk42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

Comment #246 Removed by Moderator

Comment #247 Removed by Moderator

To: WarHawk42
That is a good idea, but I am already a registered independent. Political party means little or nothing to me I have voted Republican because of the principles they use to stand for.

The 2004 Presidential race may be a real knee slapper. The Democrates are not all that dumb, they know what Bush is up to. What if they run a conservative Democrat, campaigning on visa reform and fiscal responsibility? In fact if you havn't noticed Biden is sure making noises like that already. Independents will run red lights getting to the polls voting for that platform, and the election of 2004 chould again be decided by a couple of hundred votes.

Neither party acts like they know how to get people to the polls, neither seems to realize that the average American is an independent that doesn't vote, and they don't know how or do not want to inspire them. But like they themselves say 9-11 began a new day, they havn't realized yet just how new it really is.

248 posted on 01/11/2002 8:26:26 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Arleigh
I prefer the term Republicrats. Easier to say. The real conservatives saw Bush for what he was and tried to warn people. Some people never learn.
249 posted on 01/12/2002 6:00:19 PM PST by nonliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

Comment #250 Removed by Moderator

To: codeword
As governor of the state of Texas, George Bush was always very sympathetic to even illegal immigrants. I didn't fully agree with him, but this is not new. When California was considering not allowing the children of illegal immigrants to attend school, Bush balked, proclaiming that no child, legal or illegal, would be prohibited from getting an education in Texas. This is what he means by compassionate conservatism.
251 posted on 01/13/2002 4:43:31 AM PST by Sophie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
Is it just me or are other people mad that American guys are 13,000 miles away getting shot up while the non-Americans live the good life here at home? Is that what they are over there risking their butts for?

You're NOT alone.

252 posted on 01/13/2002 5:32:38 AM PST by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
if there were no labels and no party names on election day to force people to vote according to their belief in the person and their views.

In the last several elections here in Marylandistan, campaign posters have eliminated Party affiliation! It is not "John Doe, Democrat for Congress." It is now "John Doe for Congress." Neither Republicans nor Democrats are proud of their political parties ... or maybe the parties have already merged.

253 posted on 01/13/2002 5:43:40 AM PST by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: WarHawk42
Riding easy ... Riding high in the polls, even among the Democrats, is our leader , presdident Bush. Republicans are being lulled to sleep by those numbers as they were a decade ago with the previous Bush.
Hey, why shouldn't the Democrats and Latinos express favor with Bush? They can get their Immigration agenda and their Education agenda advanced even with a Republican in office!
But when they get into the voting booth, they'll vote Democrat.
254 posted on 01/13/2002 5:59:33 AM PST by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: codeword
Bush isn't a socialist.

Maybe not ... but his legislative agenda would make a Socialist proud; his Socialist accomplishments are being envied even by Clinton!

255 posted on 01/13/2002 6:04:25 AM PST by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

Comment #256 Removed by Moderator

To: Sabertooth
I've got my 2002 ballot in one hand, and a lighter in the other.

I'd like to borrow that lighter when you're done, please.



257 posted on 01/18/2002 7:48:24 PM PST by who knows what evil?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
He is banking on losing a small number of the more conservative of his base and replacing them with many more minority and liberal votes, that is plain to see. He is counting on the fact that conservatives have no place else to go so they will be forced to vote for him anyway.

What if he gains 10 Hispanic votes, only to lose 100 conservative ones in the process? I am starting to get visions of the democrats (spit) picking up twenty or thirty seats later this year. G-d help us!



258 posted on 01/18/2002 8:11:08 PM PST by who knows what evil?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?
Like Bush isn't doing as much damage in a year as Clinton did in eight? It makes no difference anymore which party is in office they are the exact same party with the exact same goals. If this works for the Republican party and they do get a large number of illegal alien votes don't think they won't themselves turn into just as big a gun grabbers as the Democrats.

I expect because of 9-11 more people will get out to the polls this year, I don't know if their interest will hold until 2004 though. It may be another squeaker in 2004 but it won't be because of me or my families vote, which will sit there mocking away with a write in, or sitting in the third party column. I figgure if my vote is thrown away anyway, I'll choose the direction it gets tossed.

259 posted on 01/18/2002 8:20:52 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Like Bush isn't doing as much damage in a year as Clinton did in eight?

??? What did I say in my post that led to that comment? It so happens I agree with you...we have Socialist Party 'A' and Socialist Party 'B'...one will destroy our country just a little sooner than the other. It is my belief that the Republicans are alienating so much of their conservative base in an effort to pander to hispanics that the democrats are going to pick up 20 or 30 seats in the house, and a few in the senate, as well. I nearly voted 'write-in' for Alan Keyes, but was so fearful that Gore might win that I compromised my conservative principles and voted for Bush. I'm not terribly proud of myself.



260 posted on 01/18/2002 9:02:03 PM PST by who knows what evil?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-265 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson