Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FLIGHT 587 WITNESSES BLAST FEDS
New York Post | January 7, 2002 | John Lehmann

Posted on 01/07/2002 10:09:49 AM PST by Beach_Babe

New Yorkers who believe they saw American Airlines Flight 587 explode in flames before its tail sheared off have accused crash investigators of ignoring their eyewitness accounts and prematurely ruling out a terrorist attack.

Six witnesses, including a recently retired police lieutenant, an FDNY deputy chief and a former firefighter, have written to the National Transportation Safety Board demanding they be called to testify at a public hearing.

Tom Lynch, 59, a retired firefighter, said he had also spoken to 18 other people who saw the Airbus A300 flying on fire before it crashed into houses in Belle Harbor, Queens, on Nov. 12, killing 265 people.

"The NTSB is not publicly acknowledging the many eyewitness accounts of the in-flight fire or explosion, many from people who are adamant that the fire occurred before any tail or engine breakups," he told The Post.

Lynch, who organized the letter, said he was standing on Rockaway Beach Boulevard when he saw a bright orange ball of flame streaming from the right side of the plane.

Two or three seconds later, he said, he saw a larger eruption of flames consuming the entire right side of the plane's fuselage.

"There were no falling parts until the second explosion of flames - I'll go to my grave with that," he said.

The witnesses said they were surprised NTSB Chairwoman Marion Blakey was able to say, only hours after the crash, that all indications pointed to an accident, rather than a terrorist attack.

"How could that statement be made while the flight-data recorder had not been recovered, the crash-investigation team had not yet showed up and initial eyewitness reports included many accounts of one or two explosions in flight?" Lynch said.

Another witness not involved with Lynch's group, Michael Benjamin, said he saw a huge orange fire engulfing the front third of the plane's right side while he was driving along Flatbush Avenue in Brooklyn with his wife and two children.

Benjamin, who works for the Oversight, Analysis and Investigations Committee of the state Assembly, said he had attempted to contact the NTSB but had not received a return call.

Preliminary reports written by the NTSB have not mentioned in-flight explosions, but have focused on air turbulence, the composite materials used to build the jet's vertical tail, and sudden rudder movements.

An NTSB spokesman said more than 200 eyewitness accounts had been recorded and were being considered as part of the investigation.

But he said if the NTSB decided to conduct a public hearing, it would most likely seek opinions from air-safety and aeronautical-design experts rather than witnesses.

The people who signed the letter, in addition to Lynch, are retired NYPD Officer James Conrad, FDNY Deputy Chief Peter Hayden, retired transit cop Richard Kvies, sales manager John Power and food-services manager Ellie Scholfield.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aaflight587; twa800list
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last
To: Beach_Babe
Flagging for later reading....BTTT
41 posted on 01/07/2002 11:31:15 AM PST by SW6906
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beach_Babe
All we need now is Kalstrom to come out and make a statement........
42 posted on 01/07/2002 11:40:02 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
I believe that a shoe bomb may have caused an explosion on Flight 587. I also can believe that the government--WITH THE FULL BLESSINGS OF AN ALREADY HURTING AIRLINE INDUSTRY GEARING UP FOR HOLIDAY TRAVEL--covered this up. I, too, was extremely suspicious when the government and media outlets were crying "It's not a terrorist act, more likely an accident" within hours of the crash. There's hardly been a plausible news story about the investigation since then. Call me a tin-foil hatter. I don't think Flight 587 was an accident.
43 posted on 01/07/2002 11:52:16 AM PST by demnomo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lazarus Long
Oh, I see what you mean, yes, I see that alot, some people really need a band wagon to be on, and that's fine. I just don't think President Bush is super human and able to turn the Titanic around in a few short months in office, especially when he is being obstructed left and right in every agency.
44 posted on 01/07/2002 12:37:41 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: narby
More proof that the tail didn't come off because of air-loads. It came off for structural problems.
Bzzzt. The NTSB recently admitted the tail was NOT the problem. Now they are looking at "pilot error." Get with the program! The cover-ups are moving faster than the slower, more dull-witted shills.
45 posted on 01/07/2002 12:42:05 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: narby
More proof that the tail didn't come off because of air-loads. It came off for structural problems.
Bzzzt. The NTSB recently admitted the tail was NOT the problem. Now they are looking at "pilot error." Get with the program! The cover-ups are moving faster than the slower, more dull-witted shills.
46 posted on 01/07/2002 12:42:15 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: J Jay
The investigation of Flt 587 is beganning to resemble the investigations of FLT 800 and OKC Fed. Center.

With about as much lying and stalling by our government, who, by the way, lies to us about 90% of the time on everything.

47 posted on 01/07/2002 12:46:31 PM PST by swampfox98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: demnomo
Call me a tin-foil hatter.
Recall it happened a couple weeks after bin Laden said more planes would fall, while Bush was at Ground Zero and the UNGA was in town (bin Laden has some beef with the UN, which I don't get, but whatever). That and witnesses say they saw explosions. It was ALWAYS clear that terrorism should have been the working assumption.

Now that all the denials about the shoe bomber have also unraveled, it is starting to look painfully obvious something nasty happened on AA587. Compare this to the litany of bad engine, bird strike, bad tail, wake turbulence, harmonic vibration, cheese, etc., theories. ALL of them wrong. Now who's wearing the tinfoil?

48 posted on 01/07/2002 12:48:49 PM PST by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: narby
How'd a shoe bomber get into the loo within a minute after the A/C broke ground

Good point. I hadn't thought of that.

-PJ

49 posted on 01/07/2002 2:10:31 PM PST by Political Junkie Too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mixer
I heard that not only will it never be released but the guys (your friend included) have never seen the tape since it was taken from them that day. Is that true?

The Bridge and Tunnel Officers have access to the administration building which is located on the Brooklyn side of the Marine Parkway Bridge. Right behind the administration building is a locked trailer. Recording equipment is in that trailer and the officers do not have access to the trailer.

The tape in question is surveillance tape of the Cross Bay Bridge which is approximately three miles east of the Marine Parkway Bridge. There are also surveillance cameras in the administration building, the parking lot, and in the toll lanes.

The tail was fished out of the bay just west of the Cross Bay Bridge and the impact site is approximately midpoint between the two bridges

I was told that the FBI and the NTSB came that day (11/12) to retrieve the tape, but TBTA/MTA would not release it to them. They did hand it over a few days later.

And to answer your question, no, the men did not see the tape...but they never see any of the tapes. The rumor is that the plane shows up on the tape, it shows something falling off, and it shows it crashing. I specifically asked my friend about an explosion, but he said he hadn’t heard anything about that.

50 posted on 01/07/2002 2:24:14 PM PST by Beach_Babe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Beach_Babe
Thanks for the info. I hope the police and firemen witnesses fight hard to have their side told.
51 posted on 01/07/2002 3:58:40 PM PST by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: tberry
" the government controlling the dissemination of information"

Isn't that the group of which Goebels was in charge in another time and place? I wonder why we no longer call it "the propaganda machine". These days speaking the truth is costly.

52 posted on 01/07/2002 4:08:44 PM PST by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: narby
Report about Reardon Metal from the State Science Institute:
"It may be possible that after a period of heavy usage, a sudden fissure may appear, though the length of this period cannot be predicted... the possibility of a molecular reaction, at present unknown, cannot be entirely discounted... Although the tensile strength of the metal is obviously demonstrable, certain questions in regard to its behavior under unusual stress are not to be ruled out......"
Ayn Rand - Atlas Shrugged, chapter 7
53 posted on 01/07/2002 4:16:12 PM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
would that have boosted our war efforts at a time when media support was waning? If so, why cover up?

It's the economy.

Gotta keep that bubble going in order to keep the current crop of politicos in office.

54 posted on 01/07/2002 4:22:41 PM PST by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Beach_Babe
I also believe 587 was brought down by a shoe bomber.

Dozens of eyewitnesses report seeing FIRE or SMOKE or EXPLOSIONS near the right wing/fuselage juncture. Witnesses describe TWO explosions...coincidentally, the cockpit voice recorder recorded two "rattles".

Those who tell you they can look at pictures on the internet and rule out sabotage or an explosion are not reliable. They are basing their claims on those pictures that were allowed to be released.

IMHO, a shoebomber detonated near the center fuel tank, the tank subsequently exploded near the wing. This caused the plane to spin relative to the flight vector. Resulting sidewards wind pressure sheared off the tail. Once the tail was gone, stability was compromised and the still firing engines ripped from their mounts.

I have complied a list of links for those who wish to research this further.

Jet "exploded into pieces"
Feds Downplay Flt. 587 Explosion Reports

Breakup of Airliner is captured on security film.
Flight 587 Video Shows "Puff of Smoke" in Sky
FBI Sitting on Flt. 587 Videotape

Accident Theories Falling Like Dominoes (a collection of trial balloons)
Air Turbulence May Be Factor in Jetline Crash, Officials Say
Sabotage Explains Fight 587 Crash, Expert Says

JetBlue Pilot Saw American Airlines Crash
Flt. 587 Eyewitnesses insist Expolsion Came Before Tail Broke Off

55 posted on 01/07/2002 4:25:58 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine
I'm having a hard time understanding why the government would want to cover it up.

Another terrorist air attack at that time would have had catastrophic effects on the travel industry and the holiday season, and subsequently, the econonmy. It was important for them to rule out terrorism quickly...whether true or not.

I think now that a shoe bomber has been stopped, now would be a perfect time to go ahead and admit this was probably sabtoage or terrorism. I think the people's psyche could handle that info now. I pray they will do the right thing.

56 posted on 01/07/2002 4:29:44 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: J Jay
bump
57 posted on 01/07/2002 4:32:19 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: narby
So why would a theoretical explosion in the cabin or engines area in the front of the aircraft cause the vertical to depart the A/C prior to hitting the ground?

Flight data indicates a sharp lurch to the left just as the trouble started. This could have been caused by an explosion on the right side of the plane...an explosion that is confirmed by mulitple eyewitness testimony.

If the plane spun on it's vert axis, similar to a semi fishtailing, the resulting sidewards wind forces could shear off an already weakened composite tail.

58 posted on 01/07/2002 4:36:01 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Beach_Babe
"Benjamin, who works for the Oversight, Analysis and Investigations Committee of the state Assembly, said he had attempted to contact the NTSB but had not received a return call. Your fully paid, benefited, and pensioned federal government at "work"..
59 posted on 01/07/2002 4:36:32 PM PST by zog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beach_Babe;zog;eno_;demnomo;ratcat
But he said if the NTSB decided to conduct a public hearing, it would most likely seek opinions from air-safety and aeronautical-design experts rather than witnesses.

The search presupposes the result.

Keep this story alive...

60 posted on 01/07/2002 5:02:16 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson