Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US missed three chances to seize Bin Laden
The Sunday Times (U.K.) ^ | 01/06/2002

Posted on 01/05/2002 3:11:41 PM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last
To: Light Speed
Oh, you are good!

The single, shared source could be the unifying factor here.
81 posted on 01/06/2002 7:08:42 AM PST by SusanUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thanks for the flag.
82 posted on 01/06/2002 7:11:29 AM PST by SusanUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Essay Of The Week
83 posted on 01/06/2002 7:20:09 AM PST by RJayneJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Thanks for the heads up!
84 posted on 01/06/2002 7:26:54 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: veronica
bttt
85 posted on 01/06/2002 7:30:14 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DJ88, Mia T
His whole freaking LIFE has been a "screw-up". DITTO I absolutely DETEST this man. DITTO Since when isn't he available for comment? Usually you can't SHUT HIS MOUTH. DITTO! You're reading my mind again.

BUMP

86 posted on 01/06/2002 8:01:51 AM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
And what about Tony Blair in all this?

Tony has now "found religion": on the matter.

It would seem that Britan has been a Western haven for Islamic Fundamentalism.

The Richard Reids of the world have found safe haven in the UK

Now I better understand why McCartney, the Stones and the Who all showed up at Madison Square Garden.

If we are to think about Britans role in influencing our culture over 30 years, especially thru the liberal message of pop/rock, then they are certainly a partner in all this.

87 posted on 01/06/2002 8:05:50 AM PST by Helms
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Thanks as always.
88 posted on 01/06/2002 8:59:08 AM PST by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
wonder if clinton could be tried for criminal negligence in the deaths of those at the Pentagon & WTC? if I were a family member, I think he's the one i'd sue.
89 posted on 01/06/2002 9:38:20 AM PST by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick
Here is my copy. There is a thread here on FR about it with tons of other info.

#######################

To: info@rnc.org
Subject: Insults by the Administration to our FALLEN

Whoever gets this, if you don't already have it, please, dear Lord, don't let this slap in our faces stand as the Rule of This Land.

XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX TUE OCT 17, 2000 20:03:41 ET XXXXX

STATE DEPT MEMO: DEATH OF US SAILORS DOES NOT COMPARE TO PALESTINIAN TOLL

The United States State Department believes the "17 or so dead sailors" on the U.S.S. Cole "does not compare to the 100+ Palestinians who have died in recent weeks" in Mideast violence, a stunning government memo reveals.

MORE

The Clinton/Gore Administration disapproved a VOICE OF AMERICA broadcast condemning the attack on the Cole. A memo from the Executive Secretariat Staff at the State Department stated:

"The Department of State does not clear on the referenced VOA editorial.

"This editorial will reach an audience that is caught up in the violence in Israel and the Occupied Territories. The 17 or so dead sailors does not compare to the 100+ Palestinians who have died in recent weeks where we have remained silent. The people that hear this will not see the separation we are trying to make and relate it directly to the violence.

"Either VOA adds something in there to take the edge off and mention the Palestinians or we should kill this editorial until the violence has calmed for a while.

"S/CT [Secy. for counterterrorism] concurred with this. If you have questions concerning this editorial, please contact NEA/P (unintelligible)

FROM: Swadia Sarkis, Interagency Coordinator [Phone 202-647-6545, FAX 202-647-1533]
TO: Voice of America (VOA), Office of Policy
RE: VOA Editorial: Terrorism Will Fail
OCTOBER 16, 2000

END

DEVELOPING...

----------------------------------------------------------- Filed by Matt Drudge
Reports are moved when circumstances warrant
http://www.drudgereport.com for updates
(c)DRUDGE REPORT 2000


90 posted on 01/07/2002 3:58:35 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: NYC GOP Chick;veronica
Link to FR Thread on MEMO

Here is the thread. Happy reading.

91 posted on 01/07/2002 4:24:50 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
BTTT.

I'll put you on my bump list.

92 posted on 01/07/2002 4:33:53 AM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: veronica, NYC GOP chick
ZINNI ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR REFUELING

WHY is this man in Israel?

93 posted on 01/07/2002 5:00:20 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
CNN - President wants Senate to hurry with new laws - July 30, 1996
CNN logo
navigation

Search Yahoo, Search CNN


Pathfinder


Main banner
rule

President wants Senate to hurry with new anti-terrorism laws

clinton.sm July 30, 1996
Web posted at: 8:40 p.m. EDT

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Clinton urged Congress Tuesday to act swiftly in developing anti-terrorism legislation before its August recess. (1.6 MB AIFF or WAV sound)sound icon

"We need to keep this country together right now. We need to focus on this terrorism issue," Clinton said during a White House news conference.

But while the president pushed for quick legislation, Republican lawmakers hardened their stance against some of the proposed anti-terrorism measures. lott

Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, R-Mississippi, doubted that the Senate would rush to action before they recess this weekend. The Senate needs to study all the options, he said, and trying to get it done in the next three days would be tough.

One key GOP senator was more critical, calling a proposed study of chemical markers in explosives "a phony issue."

Taggants value disputed

Clinton said he knew there was Republican opposition to his proposal on explosive taggants, but it should not be allowed to block the provisions on which both parties agree.

"What I urge them to do is to be explicit about their disagreement, but don't let it overcome the areas of agreement," he said.

The president emphasized coming to terms on specific areas of disagreement would help move the legislation along. The president stressed it's important to get the legislation out before the weekend's recess, especially following the bombing of Centennial Olympic Park and the crash of TWA Flight 800.

"The most important thing right now is that they get the best, strongest bill they can out -- that they give us as much help as they can," he said.

Hatch blasts 'phony' issues

Republican leaders earlier met with White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta for about an hour in response to the president's call for "the very best ideas" for fighting terrorism.

Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, emerged from the meeting and said, "These are very controversial provisions that the White House wants. Some they're not going to get."

Hatch called Clinton's proposed study of taggants -- chemical markers in explosives that could help track terrorists -- "a phony issue."

"If they want to, they can study the thing" already, Hatch asserted. He also said he had some problems with the president's proposals to expand wiretapping.

Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-South Dakota, said it is a mistake if Congress leaves town without addressing anti-terrorism legislation. Daschle is expected to hold a special meeting on the matter Wednesday with Congressional leaders.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

rule

Related stories:


94 posted on 01/07/2002 5:20:05 AM PST by marsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marsis
Do you know the context of this article? This was legislation against the 2nd Amendment and Militias. Not about terrorism.
95 posted on 01/07/2002 5:51:48 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Nix 2
I have not seen a copy of the original legislation, if you have a copy please post.
96 posted on 01/07/2002 6:56:55 AM PST by marsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: marsis
Give me a couple of hours here. I am in the midst of other things right now, but will be glad to help you out asap.
97 posted on 01/07/2002 7:11:12 AM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

Comment #98 Removed by Moderator

To: Black Jade
I'll make a direct link to this in the next DUBOB update.
99 posted on 01/07/2002 4:30:27 PM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Black Jade
Thanks Black Jade.
100 posted on 01/07/2002 5:18:45 PM PST by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson