Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christianity Under Siege: The Stones Cry Out (Democrats continue to slam the door on Christians)
Newsmax.com ^ | 1/3/02 | Diane Alden

Posted on 01/04/2002 5:18:18 AM PST by truthandlife

Greg Pierce relates in a recent article in the Washington Times:

Democrats, in the name of tolerance, plan to demonize conservative Christians as being like the Taliban, according to an article in Newsweek. Democrats "are planning a daring assault on the most critical turf in politics: the cultural mainstream," political correspondent Howard Fineman writes. "The theory goes like this. Our enemy in Afghanistan is religious extremism and intolerance. It's therefore more important than ever to honor the ideals of tolerance – religious, sexual, racial, reproductive – at home. The GOP is out of the mainstream, some Democrats will argue [this] year, because it's too dependent upon an intolerant 'religious right," Mr. Fineman said.
A number of years ago, social critic and journalist Malcolm Muggeridge penned these words in his "Moscow Diaries," but they apply to the mindset that consumes the "progressive" Democratic Party of 2002.

It is sad that a once-great political party chooses to wage an intellectual jihad against "right-wing" Christianity. Muggeridge was writing about the "ism" of communism, but his statement also describes what anti-Christian forces are doing in the U.S. and abroad:

It destroys everything and everyone ... a darkness; a paralysis; in the country, a blight, sterility; shouting monotonously its empty formula – classless, socialist society – it attacks with methodical barbarity, not only men and classes and institutions, but the soul of a society. It tears a society up by the roots and leaves it dead. "If we go," Lenin said, "we shall slam the door on an empty house."
Well, the Democrats continue to slam the door on America's Christians and Christianity – that is, to the religion that still adheres to some core principles.

The Democratic point of view will maintain it has nothing against Christianity as long as that Christianity has no strong doctrines or core beliefs. You may be a Christian as long as you are "their" kind of Christian – that is, the kind better known as Kumbaya Christians.

They hold beliefs that disappear like fog at dawn; they believe what the secular world believes. Any policy, any horror is okay, any injustice committed against "right-wing" Christianity is okay.

In the name of tolerance the Kumbaya Christian has no real beliefs but rather adheres to a kind of mushy, feel-good Christianity. Every foul deed is all right as long as the intentions were good.

The only gospel they recognize is a watered-down social gospel, and these days they seldom complain when their Founder is redesigned as a myth by Time magazine or the History Channel.

They don't seem to blanch when He is recreated as just one more god among many. Feel-good Christians know the resurrection without the cross. They would be just as happy if it resembled a well-run kindergarten class where the participants did nothing but create pictures of rainbows and flowers and join hands to sing "The Wheels of the Bus Go Round and Round."

It is a childish Christianity, easily controlled and manipulated by the secular world. Suffering is out and sacrifice is a mental illness. In addition, along with their secular brethren they are silent about the persecution of Christians around the world.

Well, the whole bunch of them, progressive Democrats and the Kumbaya-one-church-fits-all crowd, will have to join the growing club of those who find persecuting Christians the latest in acceptable indoor and outdoor sport.

It is revealing to think that Democrats could even consider attacking Republicans because of their purported association with the Christian right. For the left and the leadership of the Democratic Party to insinuate that the Christian right is comparable to the Taliban is typical and unconscionable.

These folks will never understand that such a policy is a misuse of free speech. In their politics and policies they really do believe that the end justifies the means. How Hegelian, how like all the "isms" that destroyed millions of people in the 20th century.

The trouble is that they will not see any evil in what they do. They are, after all, the enlightened. As long as the end result is "good," anything goes.

The "enlightened" now include the mainstream press, progressive politicians of both parties but especially Democrats, academe, multinational tycoons like Ted Turner and George Soros, and the coterie of globalists who look upon organized and orthodox Christianity as evil and in the way.

Include in the list of "enlightened" the New Age people, New World Order religionists who are opting for a one-size-fits-all standard brand of religion. A religion that can be called upon to do anything, to be anything, to accept anything that the enlightened may design as good for mankind or nature or the world systems.

The new faith includes a dash of New Age mysticism, paganism, secularism, humanism, pantheism, environmentalism, communism, socialism – all the popular and politically correct "isms" of our day. These "isms" have been at war with Christianity for decades.

The new religion pays lip service to "tolerance" but fails to offer tolerance to Christians. They get away with it because they can. They control Christians by demonizing them and calling them names.

Conservatives and most Christians are loath to challenge them lest they be painted with the broad brush of newspeak and political correctness. Names like racist, sexist, homophobic or whatever works are used in order to silence Christians.

That kind of intimidation has worked before and it is working again in our own time.

A little name calling, however, is actually good for Christians. It makes them grow stronger. But persecution never just stops at name calling. That is the way real persecutions begin.

Around the world, Christians not only are being subjected to name calling, they also are being denied basic rights. They are being killed or forcibly converted to Islam.

In the United States they are one way or another being forced to convert to a brand of secular humanism gleaned from Hegel, Marx, Freud, Marcuse, Gramsci, Dewey, Maslow, Rogers and Darwin and the entire pantheon of secular gods. If they are not converted, they are silenced in a thousand subtle and not so subtle ways.

That kind of coercion is pervasive. It was pervasive in the last election cycle and now it is beginning again.

Many of our leaders and media people have succumbed to its tyranny. For many American Christians it is becoming a matter of keeping your mouth shut or ELSE. Let one high-profile religious leader like Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson say something dumb or thoughtless and all secular hell breaks loose.

When that happens, Christians on the right had better batten down the hatches because they will be tarred by the same brush.

But a strong people can weather those worldly storms. Tragically, in other parts of the world, persecution of Christians is physical as well as mental and cultural.

Next time: Christian Persecution Around the World. Dietrich Bonhoeffer's response to the evil of the silent Christian.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: abandon
The point is that Catholics are violating their own beliefs by voting in large numbers for the continuation of liberalism and moral relativism. Ministers shouldn't tell anyone whom to vote for. But they should make the moral and spiritual lessons of Scripture so clear that the choice is obvious.

We shouldn't pick on Catholics too much. There are plenty of Protestants with the same problem.

21 posted on 01/04/2002 7:02:20 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Only evangelism solves this.
22 posted on 01/04/2002 7:32:16 AM PST by RaceBannon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
How about this one for Jewish registered voters in 1996: 21.4% Republican, 46.4% Democrat and 32.1% Independent. And you know that the independent Jewish vote turns out HUGE for the republicans (ha ha ha). What's their deal?
23 posted on 01/04/2002 7:47:48 AM PST by Christian B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Christian B
No, but again, it falls back, like some other folks have said, to heritage.

I know some RC's (especially of Irish and Italian descent) who just cannot get past the image of the Republicans as anti-immigrant WASP's.

For people like that, no amount of hand shaking or philosophical agreement will make GW an acceptable candidate.

BTW, once again, this is reciprocal on the protestant/evangelical side. My wife's family is Southern Baptist, and you could not have found a better group of Clinton apologists and Gore supporters. They were both Southern Baptists, baby, and that's all there was to it!

24 posted on 01/04/2002 8:17:14 AM PST by Mr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Christian B
I would expect a sincere policital evaluation of the candidates by church leadership around election-time.

I suspect that your church might be more willing to do this if by doing so it wasn't putting its IRS tax-exempt status on the line. We can't have churches getting involved in matters of politics, you know. They might actually have an effect on the outcome, and we just can't have that.

25 posted on 01/04/2002 8:28:37 AM PST by CubicleGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Christian B
The answer to your questions about the voting habits of catholics, are complex. I was raised catholic, I was always told from birth that I was Irish-American, catholic and a democrat. The high influx of minority catholics, mainly from south and latin america may be a reason for the catholic democratic vote as well. Catholics also seem to hold on to their ethnic identity (bigotry??) a little more, for example when I was a kid we switched parishes because the priest was from Sri Lanka, to a church where the priests and deacons were Irish and Italian.

Many of the folks in my parents generation still remember stories passed down to them by their parents and grandparents of the "No Irish need apply" signs that still graced many storefronts in cities well into the 1930's. The only way they got jobs then was to get off the boat, go to the nearest church and the Priest or a member of the parish would take them to the local Democratic party headquarters, and they would be given a low wage job through them. Therefore, they owed their very livelyhood to the Democratic party and were loyal as hell. Also remember to that there are two Democratic parties, the one that exists and the one older catholics thinks still exists. The party of FDR, Truman and JFK. That is my grandfathers democratic party, not the party of Hillary and Bill.

My grandfather used to tell me when I was younger, that the Republicans were the party of management and the Democrats the party of the working man. He could also never forgive the Republicans for the scare tactics used during the 1960 campaign, where GOP operatives went around telling all who would listen if JFK won the election the Pope would rule America. Many catholics are also union members, the problem with the GOP is still that alot of the GOP is anti-union, which I could never fathom because alot of union men and women are social conservatives. In closing, I hope i've shed a little light on it for you.

26 posted on 01/04/2002 8:47:49 AM PST by ProudGenXLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
The new religion pays lip service to "tolerance" but fails to offer tolerance to Christians

Of course--it's the closest thing the disciples of Plurality can come to logic. "Nobody is right, and everybody is right"--except those who say that there way is the only way, The right way.

27 posted on 01/04/2002 9:03:09 AM PST by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pistias
"The new religion pays lip service to "tolerance" but fails to offer tolerance to Christians"

Of course--it's the closest thing the disciples of Plurality can come to logic. "Nobody is right, and everybody is right"--except those who say that there way is the only way, The right way.

Poor devils. I wonder what they would think of Jesus Christ. He's the one who said, " I am the way, the truth and the life. No man cometh unto the Father but by me." He clearly did not say Baptist, Methodist, Roman Catholic, or any other flavor of christianity. He does point out that HE is THE ONLY way. Certainly this has to offend many independent christians and other humans. God forbid that any one of them would want to practice the truth. It's just not socially acceptable.

28 posted on 01/04/2002 11:04:59 AM PST by Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
The new religion pays lip service to "tolerance" but fails to offer tolerance to Christians.

Worth a read: Rousseau's Civil Religion

29 posted on 01/04/2002 12:02:34 PM PST by Dumb_Ox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
Another great article from Diane Alden.

Terry McAuliffe and the left's comparing the Christian (God is love- read a Bible, DNC) right, or simply Christianity with the Taliban is a far greater show of ignorance than anything Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson said following 9-11.

When Hillary can stand in the pulpit of a NY Baptist church during election year and sing "Get Thee Behind Me Lazio (Satan)," or Jesse J., L. Farrakhan, Gore, or Sen. Edwards can condemn their fellow Americans from within American churches, scaring up votes and breaking more than one of the 10 Commandments in a most un-Christian way...we can say with confidence that our fellow Americans on the left are heading in the wrong direction, but we are not going to join them on that path, no way.

30 posted on 01/04/2002 3:01:45 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife,anniegetyourgun,THEUPMAN,proud patriot,azhenfud,Solomon Grundy,GenXFreedomFighter,Ra
Christianity Under Siege, Part II: Those Who Are Voiceless
31 posted on 01/17/2002 11:43:40 AM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson