Posted on 01/04/2002 12:25:32 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:03:11 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
THE folks at Msnbc are talking to former Republican presidential candidate and former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Alan Keyes about hosting a 10 p.m. show up against Fox News' new hire, Greta Van Susteren. Meanwhile, Van Susteren, a lawyer before her O.J. Simpson commentary turned her into a CNN star, reportedly has penned an eight-page memo detailing CNN's demerits. She plans to keep the document secret as long as CNN doesn't try to paint her as an ungrateful traitor.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Me too, howlin, me too. Actually, it's the times when they have pretended to do so, that have made me the most concerned.
If you are the kind of person who supports Alan Keyes, no wonder he never gets anywhere.
Nothing I have said about Alan Keyes is a lie; you may not agree with what I say, but they are NOT lies. And you know it.
It just goes to show that you people will literally say and do anything to back your man.
Later.
Surely you aren't avocating revoking our constitutional rights to dissent in an opinion? or a thread or a post?
Yes, I agree that it would be wonderful to have the sort of television program where Dr. Keyes could contribute towards the education of the Amerikan citizens. Rather than listening to the likes of recycled Gingriches, Damato, Kasich, Gerraro, Richardson, yada yada yada, how interesting it would be to have a format where various parts of the Constitution could be hashed out....none of the over-shouting crap, but a honest discussion of the various amendments, the Electoral College, the Commerce Clause, duties and responsibilities of various entities...various 'isms', and other areas of citizenship would all be things I'd love to see. People like Dr. Cleon Skousing (sp), Dr. Carson, someone like a Mark Levine.
I rather suspect that IF he does get a show, he will have control of the content. He is not dumb; he certainly knows how the media wishes to stifle real conservatism.
And, as you say.....if it doesn't come about, there's always the stereo or the radio (in my case)....based on where the show was, I'd probably have to read transcripts if they were available. :)
Glaring indication of psychosis.
There is no constitutional right to disrupt FR. In any case, I will retain my constitutional right to respond to you in the spirit of your postings.
Fine then, we are nuts! What does that make you for lurking around the asylum! /sarcasm
No I'm not.
It's perfectly honest to look you in the eye, and say, 'you lied about when Keyes endorsed Bush', and in the next breath say, "I care about you, and I'm praying for you.'
now goodnight!
If you are calling me a disruptor, please provide evidence.
Your keeper. We have to make sure you freaks don't harm yourselves.
As far as I am concerned, someone who takes part in a deliberate, organized attempt to attack the premise of a thread posted about an issue of concern to conservatives is a disrupter, even if they did not organize the attack. By that meaning, you are unquestionably a disruptor.
Fine, are you not aware that in modern psychiatry this requires you to medicate us with powerful drugs. I want my drugs now!! (How about that, you may turn me into a libertarian, Mr. Raimondo would be proud of you.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.