Skip to comments.
BUCHANAN DECLARES: DEATH OF THE WEST
Drudge Report ^
| 01/02/2002
| Matt Drudge
Posted on 01/02/2002 7:00:39 AM PST by Pokey78
XXXXX DRUDGE REPORT XXXXX WED JAN 02 2002 08:42:41 ET XXXXX
BUCHANAN DECLARES: DEATH OF THE WEST
The New Year is just minutes old and now comes Pat Buchanan to warn: The Death of the West!
In his ultracontroversial book, which will be banned, blocked and burned in many quarters, brave Buchanan contends that the U.S. will be a Third World nation by the year 2050.
The BestSellingAuthorTVHostPresidentialCandidateColumnist predicts Europe will be inundated by an Islamic-Arab-African invasion and most First World nations, including Japan, will have begun slowly to vanish from the earth.
Buchanan is primed and ready for a media blitz behind DEATH OF THE WEST [ranked #492 on AMAZON's hourly sales chart Wednesday morning], set for release from DUNNE.
Buchanan will light the bonfire on NBC's TODAY show this Friday, according to a network source.
But the DRUDGE REPORT can once again bring you the first sneak.
Relying upon the most recent UN population studies, Buchanan declares:
By 2050, only 10% of the worlds people will be of European descent. One third of Europes people will be over 60, and one-in-ten over 80. Involuntary euthanasia has already come to Europe.
Between now and 2050, Asia, Africa, and Latin America will grow by three to four billion people -- 30 to 40 new Mexicos! -- as Europe will lose the equivalent of the entire population of Germany, Poland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland.
By 2050, 23 million Germans will have disappeared along with 16 million Italians and 30 million Russians.
Russia will lose Siberia and the far east to China and be pushed out of the Caucuses and Central Asia, where Islamic populations are exploding while Russias is dying.
Either Europe must effect a radical cutback in pensions and health care for seniors, or Europe must import scores of millions of Arabs and Africans to care for the elderly and pay the taxes to sustain their welfare states.
The 4.2 million Palestinians in Israel and on the West Bank and Gaza will explode to 9 million by 2025, and 15 million by 2050, when Palestinians will outnumber Israels Jewish population two-to-one.
Americas Dual Containment policy in the Persian Gulf seems unsustainable. In less than 25 years, Iraq will have 42 million people and Iran 94 million people, more than any European nation except Russia.
The Islamic invasions of Spain and France in the eighth century, and of the Balkans and Central Europe from the 14th to the 17th centuries, will be reenacted in the lifetime of most of those now living. Islam has already surpassed Catholicism as the largest religion on earth.
It is the Christian nations -- Catholic, Protestant, and Orthodox -- that have begun to die. In a chapter titled, Where Have All the Children Gone? Buchanan explains why, and why it is unlikely the West can solve the demographic crisis before it leads to The Death of the West.
In his chapter La Reconquista, Buchanan contends that an invasion of the United States is taking place and that America now harbors a nation within a nation.
There are 30 million foreign born in the U.S. today, and between 9 and 11 million illegal aliens, or as many undocumented aliens in the U.S. as there are people in Rhode Island, Massachusetts and Connecticut.
Mexico is exporting its poor and unemployed for U.S. taxpayers to employ and educate. Radical and militant Hispanics and Mexican leaders alike believe this will lead to the cultural and demographic recapture of the Southwest from America, reversing the results of The Mexican War.
By supporting open borders, the GOP is committing suicide. First-time Hispanic voters chose Clinton 15-1 over Dole. Of the seven major immigration states -- Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Illinois, California, Texas and Florida -- Mr. Bush lost five, and perhaps six. Of the 10 states with the smallest share of immigrants, Bush won all 10.
European-Americans are a minority in Americas most populous state, California, and by 2004, will be a minority in Texas.
The political agenda of California Hispanics includes race welfare for illegal aliens, racial preferences, bilingual education, open borders, dual citizenship, Cinqo de Mayo as a California holiday, and, in one case, replacing a statue of an American hero of the Mexican War with the Aztec god Quetzacoatl.
White Americans are fleeing California at the rate of 100,000 a year.
MeCHA, the student organization that claims chapters on hundreds of campuses has a program that reads like a Mexican version of the agenda of the white-supremacist Aryan Nation.
In 2001, an Office for Mexicans Abroad in Mexico was providing survival kits with everything from dried meat to anti-diarrhea pills to condoms to Mexicans setting off to break in to the United States .
As of 2000, there were 8.4 million foreign born in California, as many foreign born as there are people in New Jersey, a primary cause of the state energy and schools crisis.
Among Third World immigrants, poverty rates and incarceration rates are double and triple what they are among native-born Americans.
Shooting up the flares and waving the flag, Buchanan argues that the 1960s counter-culture has become Americas dominant culture, and the iconoclasts of that counter-culture are systematically demolishing Americas history and heritage.
Under Political Correctness, Americas greatest heroes -- soldiers, explorers and statesmen from Columbus to George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson -- are under savage attack as genocidal racists and exploiters of indigenous peoples.
The history books of American public schools are being rewritten with the old heroes ignored or trashed and Western civilization disparaged and demeaned.
When Mel Gibsons film, The Patriot, came out in 2000, it was savagely attacked for presenting black Americans as fighting patriots in the Revolutionary War.
With the assault on Confederate books, symbols, flags, heroes, and holidays almost complete, the attack is now proceeding against the Puritan fathers, soldiers who fought in The Mexican War, and, in New Jersey, even against the Declaration of Independence itself.
In some school districts, Mark Twain, Flannery OConnor, and any realistic portrayal of the America South, including Harper Lees To Kill a Mockingbird, are now forbidden.
Even the great museums on Americas Mall, to introduce school children to the greatness and glory of Americas past, are being used to indoctrinate children in how wicked and evil our forefathers were.
In his chapter, The De-Christianization of America, Buchanan argues that the death of the Christian faith in Western countries is a primary cause of their dying populations. Whenever faith dies, the people die. A new atheistic civilization is arising, he argues, and is using its dominance of the culture and the courts to drive Christianity out of the temples of our civilization.
Secular Humanism, widely mocked and disparaged, a few decades ago, is now the dominant faith of the nations cultural elites. The moral tenets of humanism are replacing those of Christianity in our public life.
Even Christian churches are rewriting their hymnals to make them acceptable to the dominant culture.
Anti-Catholic films and filthy and blasphemous anti-Christian art are the deliberate insults of a triumphant pagan and secularist faith.
The book's publication was delayed after September terror.
Developing...
TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: charliereese; lewrockwelldotcom; pitchforkpat
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740, 741-760, 761-780 ... 1,121-1,139 next last
To: Ridin' Shotgun
LOL! The hysterical garbanzo bean should be outstanding in his field with a multitude of diversified veggies. I think he's taken root far out in left field somewhere. Lost in the weeds.
741
posted on
01/02/2002 2:56:47 PM PST
by
arm958
To: garbanzo
The problem is that Buchanan has gone from being merely a conservative dissident - to spouting what in reality is dressed-up Klan rhetoricDon't you guys ever get tired of these stupid distractions and diversions? Klan rhetoric? Right! LOL!
This is funny stuff. Here we are being invaded by MILLIONS of criminals that defecate and spit on our soveriegnty and laws and you folks attack the only GD voice that speaks out against it.
Thats right, its Buchanan thats turned huge regions of our nation into camps. LOL! Forget all these millions of criminals, lets get Buchanan.
What BS....
To: Neurogenic Weapon
My family has been in this country longer than yours. We're not going anywhere. Now it's interesting to see the claws come out. What angry that one of the lesser people's is standing up to your bigotry?
To: Petronski
where you find that "too many brown people" on Hitler,s writings, speaches or whatever?
744
posted on
01/02/2002 2:57:22 PM PST
by
ortrun
To: Petronski
where you find that "too many brown people" on Hitler,s writings, speaches or whatever?
745
posted on
01/02/2002 2:57:22 PM PST
by
ortrun
Comment #746 Removed by Moderator
To: garbanzo
Buchanan makes NONE of the claims you attribute to him in the book. Why don't you try reading it before pontificating about it?
747
posted on
01/02/2002 2:57:39 PM PST
by
Thorin
To: garbanzo
Diversity can be good or bad. During Pax Romana, Greek and Hebrew scholars obvioulsy enhanced the knowledge and well-being of the Empire, but Gauls and Germanic tribesmen in the roman legions made the entire military weak and divisive. So selective diversity should be practiced.
Comment #749 Removed by Moderator
To: Joe Hadenuf
good thinking
750
posted on
01/02/2002 2:59:24 PM PST
by
ortrun
To: garbanzo
"Pat is smart enough not to actually say n----r"Sir, you are either ignorant or a bigot. Pat's running mate was Black.
To: arm958; garbanzo
Oh, gee. I just love pulling weeds. Dang ... sorry Garbanzo, you looked like a weed outstanding in your field. Better luck next time.
Comment #753 Removed by Moderator
To: garbanzo
Granted Buchanan doesn't burn crosses or wear a white hood - but take a close look at what he's saying - that non-whites for some fundamental reason can't participate in the social and economic life of American. That non-whites are a threat to the religious foundations of America. That non-whites are inherently incapable of being successful. I haven't heard him mention interracial marriage but I expect it soon. I was going to weigh in but you just said it all.
NUMBERS 121 And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman. 2 And they said, Hath the LORD indeed spoken only by Moses? hath he not spoken also by us? And the LORD heard it.
3 (Now the man Moses was very meek, above all the men which were upon the face of the earth.)
4 And the LORD spake suddenly unto Moses, and unto Aaron, and unto Miriam, Come out ye three unto the tabernacle of the congregation. And they three came out.
5 And the LORD came down in the pillar of the cloud, and stood in the door of the tabernacle, and called Aaron and Miriam: and they both came forth.
6 And he said, Hear now my words: If there be a prophet among you, I the LORD will make myself known unto him in a vision, and will speak unto him in a dream.
7 My servant Moses is not so, who is faithful in all mine house.
8 With him will I speak mouth to mouth, even apparently, and not in dark speeches; and the similitude of the LORD shall he behold: wherefore then were ye not afraid to speak against my servant Moses?
9 And the anger of the LORD was kindled against them; and he departed.
To: PuNcH
No - I've shown how what Buchanan is advocating is almost identical to the rhetoric you see coming from various racist organizations. You claim that I'm distorting him - I've just asked for good evidence, not proof, that his views differ substantially from those espoused by the KKK.
To: Thorin
Buchanan makes NONE of the claims you attribute to him in the book. Why don't you try reading it before pontificating about it? Good point Thorin. A few posts back, garbonzo was accusing others of distorting the facts and resorting to slander.
756
posted on
01/02/2002 3:10:40 PM PST
by
arm958
To: Carlitos
Is a very difficult balance. Americans want their SUVs bigger and their Gas cheaper... Are you willing to pay an unionized oil worker $35/hr. or more to produce oil in the US? Pay between $5.00 and $7.50 per Gallon? Most Americans do not. I do feel sorry for those who can not afford education and even more for those who think they don't need it... the future is going to the very hard for them. The issue is ILLEGAL immigration! I said nothing about wage and price competition from international commerce. That is why I termed the decline in wages for some Americans that are impacted by illegal immigration as ARTIFICAL. They aren't supposed to be here anyway! You can talk all you want about your future vision of America (it's hardly original as any WSJ reader would know) but as the population of 3rd world immigrants continues to grow in this country and as more of them vote you can forget about returning America to its conservative limited government roots. America will only accelerate its move towards socialism, ever higher taxes, ever greater welfare spending (at the expense of the military), more erosion of freedoms and more morally bankrupt presidencies like Clinton. It's already happening. People like you are the useful idiots of the left.
757
posted on
01/02/2002 3:11:18 PM PST
by
WRhine
To: garbanzo
What occurs to me, and I find it sad, is that you are not able to discern the difference with what Buchanan says and Klan rhetoric. There is a difference.
There are nations all over this planet that are 90% this or that and nobody including Buchanan or I find that improper. But if the U.S. is 90% white, some consider it a definate problem. Why? Today it's seemingly a definate problem that it's 65 to 70% white. Again, why? Why was it okay for Bill Clinton and Gray Davis to celebrate the fact that the White race was no longer 50% of California's populas? What is this emphasis for diversity if not open season on whites? Are you blind to this?
I ask if you are blind to this issue, because I would find it offensive to try to reduce the numbers of blacks or people of Mexican heritage as a part of our nation. But when the shoe is on the other foot, nobody, or at least very few people find this objectionable. We have gone from about 75 to 80% white just a decade or two ago, to between 65 and 70% today. Do you find it an admirable goal to reduce our percentage of the populas as a whole to numbers below 50%? Well, that's where we're headed. If current trends hold constant, this will happen within twenty to thirty years.
Buchanan has noted this. His statistical projections for Europe and the US are irrefutable. I don't see people lamenting the percent of Vietnamese as a whole of their nation's populace to the detriment of others. I don't see anyone lamenting the Mexican, Chinese, Japanese, African nationals, Arabs, Indian nationals, Philipinos, Mexicans, Cambodians, Laotians, Brazilians, Peruvians or any nation's domestic populace being over represented within their own borders. But that's exactly what's happening to the majority race in our nation?
Is it racist to address this issue? If you consider it to be, then you must be of the opinion that it's okay if there isn't a single nation on the face of the earth that has a majority white populace. Where could whites go for self-determination if the US and Europe were to go majority non-white? Blacks could find a majority black nation. Mexicans could find a majority Mexican nation. Only the whites are deemed racist if they wish to maintain the status quo. Why?
The Klan has sought to keep blacks, Jews and others in an inferior position within our nation. They intimidated blacks, Jews and others and perpetrated acts of terrorism against them. Buchanan doesn't support that. And the attempt by anyone to link him to those types of activities is unfortunate. It denegrates Pat and the person who tries to make that claim.
In this nation we have fought to give blacks and all other ethnic groups equal access and treatment under the Constitution. Do you think Pat objects to this?
Somehow the idea that whites who wish to maintain self-determination are racists, has been accepted. How can that be? I don't consider Chinese, who wish to establish and live under their own laws, racist. The same goes for any other race or nation. Why then do some seek to deny this to whites?
It's time for a reality check bud.
To: garbanzo
Ok tell me why Pat felt it important to write a book about "Third World" immigration? Because the vast majority of immigration now occuring is "Third World" immigration.
As opposed to immigration from white Europeans or Canadians?
Presumably this is what his book expounds on. Based on current data and trends, he is extrapolating to future consequences based on current immigration policies. As I pointed out earlier if he includes Japan as one of the "undersirable" nations, then yes he probably is basing his argument on racial distinctions, otherwise it sounds like he is making cultural distinctions.
To: garbanzo
Ok tell me why Pat felt it important to write a book about "Third World" immigration? Because huge numbers of people who helped make the third world the THIRD WORLD want to pack up and bring their problems here, to the United States.
Race is immaterial, except to race baiters like you.
As opposed to immigration from white Europeans or Canadians?
Last time I checked Canada and European were part of Western Civilization. These are relatively free, stable, wealthy countries. Which means their citizens are less likely to go on the dole, or attempt to take advantage of race-based policies like affirmative action.
Why is that Pat finds it alarming that America may not be a majority white country in the future?
The race factor wouldn't matter if there were no such thing as a welfare state, affirmative action and multiculturalism. These institutions didn't exist during previous waves of American immigration, a factor most of the people who take your position choose to ignore.
Why does Pat associate the religion of Christianity with Europe when Christianity is practiced worldwide?
Do you have a quote to back this up? To my knowledge Pat Buchanan has never said Christianity is not practiced worldwide.
Why does Pat not like Catholic and Evangelical immigration from Asian countries that persecute Christians?
It's called being consistent and intellectually honest. IOW, opposing these immigrants is a necessary part of his an overall (non-racial) argument against immigration.
Many Asiatic countries are hell holes (do you disagree?), and many of those immigrants would bring more with them than Christianity, whether you will admit to it or not.
760
posted on
01/02/2002 3:12:46 PM PST
by
Blade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 721-740, 741-760, 761-780 ... 1,121-1,139 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson