It is a straw dog, a stalking horse for people seeking to promote sexual licentiousness and/or abortion.Please don't limit your agreement with me to this. That is but one element to a larger purpose, What of the larger issue, the paradigm shift aimed at redefining morality and of the meaning of justice?
I recall the Club of Rome pronouncements in the 60's when I was in elementary school. I remember my first computer program, a population program to project the size of the world population in 30 years, in 2000.Good, I knew there had to be some who remembered. Do you know if there has been a thread here on the subject that has aged off to the archives?
Since then, food production has greatly increased, with the population and the doomsters have been discredited.
You are correct.
In your own experience, what percentage of the time did a liberal quit arguing long after being discredited? :)
As liberal thinking predominates in social planning, and as social planners tend to be aloof and convinced of their own good intentions no matter how discredited their assumptions, are we not taking a big risk in placing too much faith that this one time logic alone will convince liberal adversaries? Self-satisfied adversaries in positions of power?
I have been making the case that we need to do more than that. We need our Judeo-Christian paradigm to be restored as our nation's social cornerstone more than most realize. We need to be arguing for its rightful placement before this threatening new paradigm (quality of life) supplants it completely. Comments?
Please don't limit your agreement with me to this. That is but one element to a larger purpose, What of the larger issue, the paradigm shift aimed at redefining morality and of the meaning of justice?
The only ones who really had such an agenda were the communists. The socialists that run our universities probably picked up this attitude from them. More generally, Satan has this agenda, and communism is but one method he uses to achieve it.
Since then, food production has greatly increased, with the population and the doomsters have been discredited.
You are correct. In your own experience, what percentage of the time did a liberal quit arguing long after being discredited? :)
I don't know. I stop listening and arguing after I win the point. ;)
As liberal thinking predominates in social planning, and as social planners tend to be aloof and convinced of their own good intentions no matter how discredited their assumptions, are we not taking a big risk in placing too much faith that this one time logic alone will convince liberal adversaries? Self-satisfied adversaries in positions of power?
I have been making the case that we need to do more than that. We need our Judeo-Christian paradigm to be restored as our nation's social cornerstone more than most realize. We need to be arguing for its rightful placement before this threatening new paradigm (quality of life) supplants it completely. Comments?
We need more than mere Judeo-Christian ethics in our country. The right laws did not prevent ancient Israel from collapsing into immorality and going into slavery. We need people to actually be converted to Christianity and being guided by the Holy Spirit. Thus I am not sanguine concerning political action to reform this country. Rather, I think the only hope of this country is evangelism to Christianity. I do not consider this country a Christian nation, except in name only.