[tpaine]

Yep, there are a lot of constitutional violations in the lawbooks.

Thats why free republic is here, - to discuss them, & work to correct them, just as JR was quoted as saying above.

Why are you here?

[A CA Guy]

To debate many ideas and point out the difference between good and evil regarding illegal drug use on these kinds of threads. But I am hardly a one issue person.

So why don't the Libertarians go challenge what they wish in court? Surely the group must have collectively more than 2 nickles to rub together and can form the challenges they feel should be made. Heck it's why the court system is there. We can watch it on Court TV perhaps. Go for it! Sure doesn't hurt the country to challenge anything.

Happy New Year!

[laredo44]

Yep, there are a lot of constitutional violations in the lawbooks.

Of all Roscoe's rant on the justification for drug laws, I like this one best.

(7) The United States is a party to the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, 1961, and other international conventions designed to establish effective control over international and domestic traffic in controlled substances. <

Yikes! Some Senate approved treaty will be used to justify the confiscation of guns, abolition of the death penalty and individual rights. This is satisfactory justification to prop up their rules. Pathetic.