Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: IF, and this is a BIG if...

Posted on 12/21/2001 6:52:48 PM PST by LSUsoph

Dick Cheney due to health reasons decides to withdrawl his name from the ticket in 2004 after a very successful term as Vice President. He figures he can still stay close to the President and advise him in any way possible, but not have to deal with the every day hustle of being the Vice-President of the country. So who would President Bush pick to be his new VP? I think Condi Rice would be a wonderful choice but I dont know if this country (especially the Republican Party) is ready for a VP who is black, a woman, and from the South (Alabama). I also love Powell but would he and Pres Bush be able to work hand in hand as P-VP? Donald Rumsfeld is a terrific Sec of Defense and I think he would make a great President one day...maybe him being VP could lead us to 8 great years of a Rumsfeld Presidency after 8 great years of Bush. Other candidates that come to mind would be Tom Ridge, Liddy Dole, Ashcroft, and dare i say it...JOHN MCCAIN ( i know, i know, but i think the Bush-MCcain ticket would be a shoe in). My pick would have to be Rice, she is worth her weight in Gold. She is a genius, works well with Bush, and would really be great for the country. And what would the naysayers say after Bush nominates a black woman to be his right hand WOMman?? I think they would just have to throw up the white flag! GO DUBYA!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Free Republic
KEYWORDS: abortionlist; catholiclist; christianlist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,161-1,169 next last
To: davidosborne;Dr. Good Will Hunting
now we have a long way to go to get there.. I am in favor of taking one step at a time so long as we are stepping in the RIGHT direction..
661 posted on 12/29/2001 6:13:38 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
Fair enough.
662 posted on 12/29/2001 6:14:09 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 659 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
Isn't it funny how moral arguments have become diminished to the point of being termed "emotional"? And here I thought I was being so cold and rational when I observe the command, "You shall not murder". Call me emotional then!

It's funny how RINO Neville Chamberlain clones can seriously contend that the Republican Party could dump the pro-life position and yet keep the votes of pro-lifers.

They label anti-murder pro-lifers "emotional", well, that indicates people who would never accept getting screwed.

663 posted on 12/29/2001 6:17:03 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Good Will Hunting
I think we are stepping in the RIGHT direction :)
664 posted on 12/29/2001 6:19:18 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Good Will Hunting;all
I have enjoyed this civil discussion.. but its time to get back to work... send me a postcard !!

SSG David C. Osborne
4th Plt, 372nd MP CO
Eagle Base, Bosnia
APO AE 09789


665 posted on 12/29/2001 6:23:38 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
I enjoyed reading your profile page..

FReegards,

David

666 posted on 12/29/2001 6:29:10 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 658 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
the battle will ALWAYS be on PRINCIPLE FIRST.. ISSUE 2nd.. !!

You have made it very clear that it is okay to keep on "killing babies" until the problem can be solved your way. Another less "principled" method may get the job done sooner but what is a few million "babies" when it comes to sticking to a "principle."

667 posted on 12/29/2001 6:36:35 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
Isn't it funny how moral arguments have become diminished to the point of being termed "emotional"? And here I thought I was being so cold and rational when I observe the command, "You shall not murder". Call me emotional then!

Our opponents not only reject moral arguments, but they also reject the absolute certainty that the GOP would be destroyed if we became Democrat Lite and stopped being the party of life.

For starters, the pro-lifers would either stay home or start a new party (perhaps joining the Reform Party, which is showing signs of becoming pro-life). Then the GOP could go back to its former "glory" of being a permanent minority party as it was before the cultural conservatives joined the fiscal conservatives during the Reagan revolution.

The disrupters on this thread seem to want us to believe that the GOP would be just fine if we lost our principles. I think the folks over on Democrat Underground would be overjoyed if we became Democrat Lite. They certainly don't have the interests of the GOP at heart. Who would want to vote for the GOP any more if they could get the REAL thing by voting Dem??

668 posted on 12/29/2001 6:39:34 PM PST by Aunt Polgara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: pcl
You obviously have not read all of my postings. THE PRINCIPLE stands that A BABY IS A BABY AT CONCEPTION... the ISSUE is whether or not we are taking steps to stop this killing or simply trying to rationalize the killing of babies...
669 posted on 12/29/2001 6:39:55 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

Comment #670 Removed by Moderator

To: Aunt Polgara
Hey PEE-CEE, reading your own posts again, huh???

A big QED for post 635.

Thank you ma'am.

671 posted on 12/29/2001 6:45:15 PM PST by pcl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 654 | View Replies]

To: pcl
And exactly what is this "less principled way"? That seems to be a tangled confusion of logic. By what means could you eliminate abortions (effectively and thoroughly) other than through "principled means"?
672 posted on 12/29/2001 6:53:26 PM PST by CaptBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 667 | View Replies]

To: Aunt Polgara
For starters, the pro-lifers would either stay home or start a new party (perhaps joining the Reform Party, which is showing signs of becoming pro-life).

Or the Constitution Party :) !!

www.constitutionparty.com

673 posted on 12/29/2001 6:55:05 PM PST by CaptBlack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica;Aunt Polgara;notwithstanding;Harrison Bergeron;patent;jmj333;proud2brc...
Aunt Polgara's post #668 beautifully, perfectly sums up why you are pushing a losing case, even on purely pragmatic grounds.

As follows:

Our opponents not only reject moral arguments, but they also reject the absolute certainty that the GOP would be destroyed if we became Democrat Lite and stopped being the party of life.

For starters, the pro-lifers would either stay home or start a new party (perhaps joining the Reform Party, which is showing signs of becoming pro-life). Then the GOP could go back to its former "glory" of being a permanent minority party as it was before the cultural conservatives joined the fiscal conservatives during the Reagan revolution.

The disrupters on this thread seem to want us to believe that the GOP would be just fine if we lost our principles. I think the folks over on Democrat Underground would be overjoyed if we became Democrat Lite. They certainly don't have the interests of the GOP at heart. Who would want to vote for the GOP any more if they could get the REAL thing by voting Dem??


674 posted on 12/29/2001 6:55:14 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
I had to stick around for a min to see where the debate was going.. I will this in your capable hands captain !

SALUTE !!

675 posted on 12/29/2001 6:55:23 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 672 | View Replies]

To: CaptBlack
Captain: please check out post #674, this thread.
676 posted on 12/29/2001 6:56:10 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: pcl;wwjdn;woahhs;carenot;utah girl;texas gal
Aunt Polgara's post #668 beautifully, perfectly sums up why you are pushing a losing case, even on purely pragmatic grounds.

As follows:

Our opponents not only reject moral arguments, but they also reject the absolute certainty that the GOP would be destroyed if we became Democrat Lite and stopped being the party of life.

For starters, the pro-lifers would either stay home or start a new party (perhaps joining the Reform Party, which is showing signs of becoming pro-life). Then the GOP could go back to its former "glory" of being a permanent minority party as it was before the cultural conservatives joined the fiscal conservatives during the Reagan revolution.

The disrupters on this thread seem to want us to believe that the GOP would be just fine if we lost our principles. I think the folks over on Democrat Underground would be overjoyed if we became Democrat Lite. They certainly don't have the interests of the GOP at heart. Who would want to vote for the GOP any more if they could get the REAL thing by voting Dem??


677 posted on 12/29/2001 6:58:56 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
Please check out post #674, this thread.
678 posted on 12/29/2001 7:01:04 PM PST by Dr. Good Will Hunting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 675 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
Post 599 and 601. You will find the "meaning of life" there....

Actually, everyone knows that the "meaning of life" if 42.

679 posted on 12/29/2001 7:05:00 PM PST by Aunt Polgara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 670 | View Replies]

To: davidosborne
Praise the Lord !!.. and Congratulations on 34 years.. I have been married only 6years and my wife says the same about me !! I don't ever want to let her down, or my 2 beatiful daughters!!

Thank you. And please thank your dear wife for her sacrifices in holding down the home front while you are far away. God bless and keep you and your family. :-)

680 posted on 12/29/2001 7:17:28 PM PST by Aunt Polgara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,161-1,169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson