Posted on 12/21/2001 11:46:28 AM PST by LiveFree2000
The moral minefield of a boy's dying wish 21dec01 But there's a problem – he's in hospital, he doesn't want to talk to his mum and dad about it, and having been sick and in and out of hospital since the age of 12, he has formed no friendships or relationships with girls from his peer group. The boy, let's call him Jack, simply wants to experience what every testosterone-driven heterosexual teenage boy thinks about, allegedly, every 17 seconds. Sex. So what does he do? It sounds like a hypothetical situation, but this story is true and Jack is real. His heartbreaking story about death and desire came to light last month when the child psychologist dealing with Jack wrote a letter to the Radio National program, Life Matters, in which moral dilemmas are discussed by academics. It's a fascinating topic for academic discussion: how does a minor and the people who care for him tread though the ethical and practical minefield to see that he gets such a wish? And firstly, should he even be granted his wish? While many of us might scream reflexively "Yes! Of course!", cautious ethicists may ask questions. Is a 15 year-old, officially a child, intellectually and emotionally competent to make such a mature decision? Do the parents have a right to know? Should the woman involved be charged with the criminal offence of having sex with a minor? Should a prostitute be involved? Should the hospital staff help to organise something? All valid questions ripe for discussion, but forget the academic debate. What happened to Jack himself? Yesterday, the child psychologist – who wishes to remain anonymous – told The Daily Telegraph the rest of the dying boy's story. He had become involved after a nurse tending Jack – the only person Jack took into his confidence – urged the boy to talk to him. So Jack spoke to the child psychologist, who specifically deals with children dying of terminal diseases, and this was not the first time the psychologist had heard of such a wish from a teenage boy. "He had been sick for quite a long period and his schooling was very disrupted, so he hadn't had many opportunities to acquire and retain friends, and his access to young women was pretty poor," said the psychologist. "But he was very interested in young women and was experiencing that surge of testosterone that teenage boys have." So Jack and the psychologist had a series of thorough discussions in which they went through every possible permutation of what might happen to him physically and emotionally so that he was "completely prepared" for the prospect of living out his final dream. Jack's state of mind, he said, was sensible and mature and psychologically, totally competent. As he said: "Terminally ill kids get very wise, very quickly" and Jack had been sick for a long time. The hospital staff who knew about Jack's wish at first wanted to help, their first reaction being "let's do a whip around and pay for a prostitute" but of course ethical and legal considerations stopped them in their tracks. The psychologist also had canvassed members of the clergy, and found an interesting response: "It really polarised them, about half said what's your problem? And the other half said [the idea] demeans women and reduces the sexual act to being just a physical one. "I just saw it as a legitimate request of a young man who wants to experience something that can do no harm." The psychologist said that with Jack, he rigorously questioned what damage might be done to him as a result of fulfilling his wish, and the answer came up every time: none. "Everyone's uncomfortable with teenage sex, period," said the psychologist. "Adolescents becoming sexual is enormously confronting, and a lot of people believe that kids shouldn't be sexual. But we are sexual from the womb to the tomb – that's my view. "But ethics and morals aside, in children dying over a long period of time, there is often a condition we call 'skin hunger'." This happens when a child, seriously ill and in and out of hospital and receiving medical treatment over a long period, yearns for non-clinical contact because "mostly when people touch them, it's to do something unpleasant, something that might hurt". "So you ask," said the psychologist, "what was this young man wanting? "Was he wanting a cuddle?" Probably yes, but as his illness and its treatment hadn't obliterated his normal teenage urges, he also really wanted that consummate experience. So without his parents knowing, and completely without the involvement of the hospital staff, and not – it must be stressed – on the hospital's premises, Jack "did engage in the act and it was everything he wished it to be". "He was very, very happy and only slightly disappointed that it was over quickly." "The act", his dying wish, was with a sex worker who was "organised by friends who thought it was the right thing to do". All precautions were taken, and the friends made sure the act was fully consensual and involved no abuse or exploitation. As for the legal ramifications of such a case, "quite clearly the law was broken, but of the people involved, most didn't give a toss," the psychologist said. And what of the parent's right to know about their son? Jack simply didn't want to talk to them about it. He loved them, but they are religious and he didn't want them to know. Anyway, what 15-year-old boy does want to talk to his parents about sex, even under normal circumstances? There is also legal precedence for a minor of sufficient maturity and intelligence to be given confidential medical treatment but does sex with a prostitute count as treatment? "Absolutely. It is absolutely part of therapy," said the psychologist, "Because it was what he wanted. People talk about a trip to Disneyland being therapeutic what's the difference? It was what he wanted." So Jack got what he wanted, and last week, he finally lost his fight with the cancer.
Is it right or wrong to grant a dying teenaged boy his wish to have sex? LUCY CLARK examines a modern ethical dilemma:
A 15 YEAR-OLD boy is terminally ill with cancer. He knows he doesn't have very long to live, and he has a dying wish. It is not to go to Disneyland or to meet his favourite actor, rock or sports star but it is this: he wants to make love to a woman.
Isn't it the Jesuits who are credited with the oft used line, "It is easier to obtain forgiveness than to obtain permission"?
Planned Parenthood seems to think so.
Do the parents have a right to know?
Planned Parenthood doesn't seem to think so.
Regarding the article though, what a strange set of circumstances to weigh. Without condoning his actions, my heart certainly goes out to him.
As a Christian, I wish more people would use Scripture as a lamp instead of a sledgehammer, particularly when mercy and compassion are more sought than a lecture or a doctrinal thesis. I will not say what becomes of this child - it is God's to decide. That's what makes Him so difficult for us finite creatures to fully contemplate when we seek rigid answers.
You are joking arn't you?
It is defined as a male prostitute or, more generally, "a man who indulges in unlawful sexual intercourse."
If you want to convince folks that the boy sinned, you must show us -- from the O.T. law -- why the act was "unlawful."
Regards.
Yes, that would be consistent with the 'Libertarian' way, wouldn't it?
you might have to back up your name after a juvenile comment like that. Nice.
The word used in the passage is TAZNUTH.
It is defined (as is PORNOS in the Greek) as "unlawful sex."
So, that verse doesn't get us there.
We still need to know what makes it "unlawful."
How about mine, until he gets here?
I'm a serious Christian. I'm a worship leader, I've led evangelism-oriented ministries, I've known the Lord for 25 years.
People DO NOT go to Hell because of what they do - they go because of what they are, unregenerate, fallen human beings. We are ALL born that way, and if we don't meet the Lord in a saving relationship through Jesus Christ, we WILL wind up in Hell.
In my opinion, one of the primary reasons that sex is supposed to be between man and wife is because of all the problems that result otherwise. There are bonds that form, etc., that are designed to be FOR LIFE when we have sex with another human being. That's how a loving Father designed it to work.
This young man, short of a miracle, had no future on this earth where the problems I mention above would happen to him. His life was about to end.
While I *do* believe that sex belongs inside marriage, I also know that we ALL have a very hard time being perfect. I don't know if this boy was saved or not - I would guess not. I don't think that we, as Christians, can hold non-Christians to the same standards that the Bible prescribes for us. It just doesn't work. And that being said, I'd be in favor, after a long talk with him to see if he knew the Lord or not, of letting him have his wish. If he WAS a Christian, I would feel otherwise - I'd remind him that his life wasn't ending, and that it would be better for him to stay pure, for the purpose of his relationship with God being as "right" as we can possibly make it. Which really isn't very "right" for any of us :)
So that's what I think :)
You're not suggesting that you're... *gasp*...
"operating" without a state license, are you?
We wouldn't be having one.
For, as everyone knows, a girl of ANY age and, for the most part, ANY appearance can find someone to have sex with her within five minutes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.