Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/21/2001 5:16:01 AM PST by csistrueblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: csistrueblue
It's easy to find her home in the D.C. area. Look for the circling buzzards.
2 posted on 12/21/2001 5:17:48 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
she must be a lonely old coot.
3 posted on 12/21/2001 5:19:41 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
BIG Texas BUMP! And here's that e-mail address again:

helent@hearstdc.com

4 posted on 12/21/2001 5:21:47 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
If I don't help little Tommy Dashole will be so 'disappointed'

helent@hearstdc.com

.

6 posted on 12/21/2001 5:25:05 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
You should've sent her an airbrushing program and instructed her to make liberal use of it before allowing pictures of herself to be circulated.
8 posted on 12/21/2001 5:29:12 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue

Helen Thomas BUMP


9 posted on 12/21/2001 5:38:22 AM PST by RippleFire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
OH PLEASE! She is just old and feeble. I feel sorry for her and wrote her this sweet note:

Dear Ms. Thomas:

It's very odd that you have been able to sit your fat ass in front of several presidents asking them inane questions for so many years. I suspect that your current employer pays you to "work" at the White House just for the comedy your stupid questions bring. Oh well, the jokes on you.

Recent events have caused many people to look at the liberal leftists "media" types like you in a different light. Hopefully, at some point in the near future hacks like yourself with their own liberal agenda will be a thing of the past. In the meantime we will watch you make a fool of yourself at White House press briefings.

10 posted on 12/21/2001 5:38:34 AM PST by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
That's really bizarre... "try living your own life"... from a reporter? Someone who's only goal in life is to butt into other people's lives? Is she saying that we shouldn't watch the press briefings? That what journalists do is none of our business?

Wow... I used to be a liberal, (well, sort of anyway) and when I first came onto FR I was puzzled at all the remarks about sneering, narrow-minded, arrogant liberals. After all, everyone I knew was aware that only conservatives were sneering, narrow-minded and arrogant. Two years on FR have given me such a new perspective. Now I look on tidbits like this and think, "how brainwashed most Americans are." Thank you FR. (Yes, I have donated money.)

16 posted on 12/21/2001 6:18:02 AM PST by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
While she may read her e-mail, she certainly doesn't respond to same. I have e-mailed her on three seperate occasions and never recieved so much as a "go to hell" from her.
17 posted on 12/21/2001 6:19:55 AM PST by scooter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
I actually like Helen Thomas:

Ms Thomas

There was a time of time of civility in this world when young men like me respected their elders simply for the fact that they were our elders. I have come to see that that is a foolish way to live, a view enhanced by the events of recent months, and I have a few things to say to you.

After reading your dispatches from the White House during the Clinton administration, I came to view you- not professionally, but personally- as a twisted, sick person. Your dissembling of the lies and blindly bellying up to the trough to slurp up whatever Mike McCurry or Joe Lockhart fed you did in fact ensure the events of of September 11th of this year. The truth is irrefutable and cannot be taken back: while Clinton undermined our very Constitution, Helen Thomas sat on her hands.

Ms. Thomas, I am embarrassed by you and for you, but being a liberal toady you have no concept of embarrassment. If you were capable of self reflection you'd be haunted by every word that has passed your fingers, from your shameless lapping at JFK's feet (and after all of that he never invited you to go for a swim, did he?) to your warped rants at George W. Bush.

For all your lack of embarrassment, I'm convinced you've achieved the liberal's reward: self disgust.

I know for a fact I'm sick of you.

PS. By the way, people are talking about you here....

http://www.FreeRepublic.com/focus/fr/595009/posts

20 posted on 12/21/2001 6:48:48 AM PST by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
Dear Helen,

I am one of those political junkies that follows the news around and therefore must rely on reporters, like yourself, to supply me with the information I need to formulate my opinion regarding current events.

I would just like to say that some of your recent Q&A's with the Press Secretary shows that you have lost any credible impartiality in reporting the news. During the Clinton Administration I never heard you so venomously attack the Press Secretary. What happened? Maybe it's time you think about retirement? You've got a beautiful relative in my area, Suzanne Geha, that will do a more than adequate job filling your shoes.
24 posted on 12/21/2001 7:13:29 AM PST by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue; RedBloodedAmerican; Eric in the Ozarks; Elle Bee; NittanyLion; RippleFire...
Here is my e-mail to her. I tried to post this earlier, but AT&T Broadband had technical problems:

Dear Miss Thomas:

It would be nice if you weren't so "snippy" in the press conferences at the White House (to use your good friend algore's expression). Your contempt for President Bush is obvious when you do that. Here is what I'm talking about:


After Fleischer told a reporter that Walker "is considered, under the Geneva Convention regarding the treatment of prisoners of war, a battlefield detainee," Thomas demanded: "My question falls in line with that. Are we so primitive that we would ship this man in a box, deny him legal rights, deny him the right to see a lawyer, deny him the right to see his parents? I mean, is that America?"
Fleischer tried to calm down the long-time UPI reporter: "Helen, under the Geneva Convention regarding treatment of prisoners of war, the military and intelligence agencies may question prisoners for information that's of military value in the conduct of war without the presence of a lawyer. That is what the Geneva Convention calls for-"
Thomas piped up: "You ship him in a box?"
Fleischer: "-and the Geneva Convention is being followed in this case."
Moran demanded: "So it trumps his constitutional right to-"
Fleischer: "No, this is done consistent with the Constitution."
Moran: "How so?"
Fleischer: "Because what you're referring to, Terry, deals with custodial interrogation-"
Moran: "Right."
Fleischer: "-and that only comes into play, that only comes in as a matter of statute when he is in the custody of law enforcement personnel. He is covered under the Geneva Convention by military personnel, which triggers a different set of statutory requirements."
Thomas, obsessed with parental access: "He can't see his parents? He's not allowed to see his parents?"
Fleischer: "Again, Helen, I think that they are moving forward with a review of the facts in this matter. But he is being treated under the Geneva Convention. He is being protected. He has been given medical care which he was not receiving under the Taliban. And he has received the protection of the United States Armed Forces in a very dangerous battlefield condition."
Thomas charged: "He's being interrogated without a lawyer. Is that fair?"
Fleischer pointed out: "He is being given all his rights, which are far more than the rights the Taliban or the al-Qaeda extended to anybody living there."
Thomas sighed: "Well, we're not comparing ourselves, are we?"
If you would like to defend yourself, please go to www.freerepublic.com and register. Then go to this location:

Helen Thomas Loves Johnny Taliban
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/594515/posts

Sincerely,

Richard Meek
Dallas County, Texas

I doubt that I'll get a response, and I certainly don't look for her to register and comment on her behavior, but I had to invite her anyway. We'll see what happens! Here's the easy link to that article, btw:

Helen Thomas Loves Johnny Taliban
( http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/594515/posts )

25 posted on 12/21/2001 7:16:56 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue

27 posted on 12/21/2001 7:19:00 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
LOL I did and told her to take her meds BEFORE a press conference so she wouldn't ask all those dumb questions...she responded by telling me to "get a life - if I could find one" HA HA
29 posted on 12/21/2001 7:22:32 AM PST by GussiedUp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
I
DON'T
DARE

31 posted on 12/21/2001 7:26:44 AM PST by 1 FELLOW FREEPER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
Helen needs to do what I did long ago!!!!!!!
32 posted on 12/21/2001 7:26:44 AM PST by oldgoat72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
Here's my e-mail to the troll under the bridge:

Helen:

Your continually biased remarks in the tenuous form of questions to the Presidential News Secretary, Ari Fleisher, are causing you to be a continual target of ridicule by your colleagues and by your very few readers in the Hearst newspapers. I just want to say, "keep it up, Helen. You are showing all of America the true negative liberal bias of the left wing media." Bernard Goldberg has exposed you liberal presstitutes for what you are. America is coming to her senses and making reporters like you less relevant every day. Thank goodness.

33 posted on 12/21/2001 7:29:25 AM PST by shortstop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
I can't bring myself to pound on an old woman who is obviously losing it.

Now, dashole, leahy, gephardt, condit, clinton, boxer, et al. ...That's a whole different deal.

34 posted on 12/21/2001 7:29:45 AM PST by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
Many months ago I emailed her about her obvious fawning over then POTUS BC. Her response was VERBATIM the email you received. Maybe she just thinks everyone who takes the time to email her doesn't have a life beyond contacting her. She sure doesn't seem to want President Bush to "just live his life" without her sour graping comments. She is a hypocrite gimmiecrap if ever there was one.
38 posted on 12/21/2001 7:37:11 AM PST by PISANO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: csistrueblue
I'm sure Helen would like to here from you - here is her email address helent@hearstdc.com

Gee, I'd love to send a message to the She-Hutt. Does anyone know of a "Babelfish"-like translator that includes Huttese?

44 posted on 12/21/2001 8:04:40 AM PST by Charles Martel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson