Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Girls to Guys -- It's on the Rise
San Francisco Examiner ^ | 12/19/01 | Tanya Pampalone

Posted on 12/19/2001 8:58:59 AM PST by medlarebil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-299 next last
To: ProudAmericanConservative
Actually, I heard some of these people had an androgynous personality.

Out of a population of six billion there are just some people in the world that don't fit your view of either male or female.

161 posted on 12/19/2001 10:11:51 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: ProudAmericanConservative
Gender has nothing to do with how you feel about it, it just is, same as race. I can wake up tomorrow and decide to call myself black, but im white and the only person that will recognize me as black is myself.

The human mind is far more complex than the body it is housed in.

By your views, a person is no more than the sum of the parts of that person.

And you are wrong.

162 posted on 12/19/2001 10:16:25 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
Psycho-babble-BS-Leftist Crap! Oh! I forgot tree huggin!
163 posted on 12/19/2001 10:23:40 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Psycho-babble-BS-Leftist Crap! Oh! I forgot tree huggin!

I guess that you don't even know where liberals stand on the nature versus nurture arguement.

If you did, you would realize that it is you who are the tree huggin leftist on this subject.

164 posted on 12/19/2001 10:29:56 PM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
You have already stated your argument on that point more than once. You are dead wrong on all counts. I am afraid you need to go back to conservative school for a refresher.
165 posted on 12/19/2001 10:37:21 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: medlarebil
"Confusing" to say the least! It's not fair when the folks who are confused insist on further confusing those of us who'd rather not know in the first place!

I understand that some women (note I said **some**) women want to be men and that some women want so badly to be men that they are willing to subject themselves to risky surgery and riskier hormone treatments in order to be men.

The puzzling question is why? Often the gays reaffirm their lifestyle by asking who would want to be gay if they truly had a choice, what with the discrimination, the beatings, the immuno-deficiency, why, nobody would choose such a thing which must mean they were "born that way" and had no choice at all.

So I ask, who would want to be a man, what with the discrimination, the humiliations, the constant dissing in the media, the military conscripton and being the person who has to put his ass on the line every time someone threatens your property or loved ones? Surely, the only way I would choose such a lifestyle is if I were "born that way". You know, I'll bet it's genetic!

BTW, since your nick is "liberaldem" in reverse, does this mean you are secretly one or does it mean you're the opposite of one?

166 posted on 12/19/2001 10:49:43 PM PST by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
By the way, what in the heck is nature vs. nurture! I thought it was the debate over breast feeding. LOL! Trans gender ajustment as you people put it is the most sickening thing I've heard of in my lifetime. Disgusting. Morbid. Anti-human sicko crap.

BARF!

167 posted on 12/19/2001 10:51:39 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Now I'm prett much a die hard conservative...

Just a thought. Ever read about Edgar Cayce?

Suppose there is something to re-incarnation?

Suppose you lived in the last few lives as one gender and then were born to the other gender?

Talk about confusion!

168 posted on 12/19/2001 10:51:56 PM PST by Mogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
ajustment=adjustment Need to make sure everything is in the right place.
169 posted on 12/19/2001 10:55:39 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
"Actually, I heard some of these people had an androgynous personality." Personality has nothing to do with physical sexual characteristics!!!!! You might like to do feminine things, but that does not make you a female!! What the Hell are you babbling about??
170 posted on 12/19/2001 10:56:52 PM PST by ProudAmericanConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Once again, what does this have to do with XX males or XY females? I'm not talking about people who identify as the opposite gender, I'm talking about people whose unaltered genitals don't match their chromosomes.

A person with XX chromosomes is female--no matter what she "looks" like.

And a person with XY chromosomes, is a male, no matter what he "looks" like.

Providing, of course, we are speaking of genuine X and genuine Y chromosomes, and not some freaky mutated X that has lost a leg through some damage or other, and so looks like a Y.

If a person has, for example, XX chromosomes and yet has what "appears" to be a male sex organ because of some weird mutation or birth defect or other mutilation, then I sure wouldn't blame her for wanting her body to better express her true sex, as determined by her female, XX, chormosomes.

But if someone who is XY and has a pensis--i.e., is a normal male--wants to make his body resemble that of a woman's by having a "surgeon" cut him and stitch him into a different shape--that guy remains a guy and I will refer to him as a he.

Likewise, the XX person is a woman is a woman is a woman.

And should there be something that does not fit either of the two above categories, then it is not male and it is not female: It's a third sex or it's sexless.

Regarding a "functioning penis", I heard not long ago of a male to female to male transexual. Basically he was either disfigured or born with some defect that left his male organs damaged in some form, so a doctor preformed gender reassignment surgery on him when he was an infant and his parents raised him as a female (the doctor, IIRC, wrote a book on the "success" of it all). All his life he never identified well as a female and it wasn't until he was an adult that he discovered what really happened. He since had a second surgery to restore his male appearance to match his identity, complete with pump-action penis (yes, the term makes me snicker too). He has since married, though I don't know (and do doubt) whether he is able to father children of his own. Since his penis is arguably not "fully functional", is he not a man even though he was born male, obtained surgery to reestablish himself as male and intends to live as a male?

I seem to remember the case you're citing as one where the fellow was a victim of a botched circumcision; the doctors then compounded that error by advising the parents that the kid would have emotional problems over his stunted organ, and so would be better-off as a "girl"--he wasn't: he wasn't made a real girl and he wasn't better-off; because he had the male, Y, chromosome.

171 posted on 12/19/2001 10:58:25 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
You are bizarre! So what you are saying is that, I as a white male may call myself black, and as long as I think I am black, then I am?? Thats Ludicrous...... (although this may have advantages, I'm married to Ann Coulter, I'm married to Ann Coulter, I'm married to Ann Coulter.....)
172 posted on 12/19/2001 10:59:52 PM PST by ProudAmericanConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Mogger
People like Edgar have nothing to contribute to society and therefore indulge in imaginative mind games of what if. They are already confused. Too bad we got rid of mental hospitals and now have to put up with all these people running around loose.(because they are only different?)
173 posted on 12/19/2001 11:03:02 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: Paul C. Jesup
The human mind is far more complex than the body it is housed in. .

You know, you may have a point there.

All day I've been feeling like a baboon trapped in a human body.

I think I'll find a doctor who will transplant hair all over my face, implant a silicone snout in my face complete with plastic fangs, and fashsion a tail from tissues cut from my thighs.

Then I shall truly be a baboon, and can be denied my civil rights and kept in a zoo.

Oh joy! Oh, fulfillment!

174 posted on 12/19/2001 11:05:19 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
You want to see something really crazy! The House is still in session, trying to pass the stimulus bill!
175 posted on 12/19/2001 11:06:29 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
**Do we operate on the body?

Or do we operate on the brain?**

What if the tranny believes he/she/it should have been born a chicken? Should we perform surgery to give him/her/it a crop, a vent and wings? Maybe we could transplant some DNA and hope it takes! After all, if **thinking** you are a certain creature makes it so, I think I'd like to be a giraffe.

176 posted on 12/19/2001 11:07:19 PM PST by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
How would you get into your Toyota?
177 posted on 12/19/2001 11:09:23 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Duck. But that would require *more* surgery...
178 posted on 12/19/2001 11:12:13 PM PST by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Quack!........LOL!
179 posted on 12/19/2001 11:13:20 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Oh my God. Charlie Rangel is trying to claim he is fiscally responsible and the republicans are wastefull and iresponsible............HA!
180 posted on 12/19/2001 11:21:01 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 281-299 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson