[ConsistentLibertarian]

People who want to limit sexual expression in public places aren't necessarily anti-sex.

[detsaoT]

People who want to limit sexual expression in public places aren't necessarily anti-sex.

Hate to say it, bud, but Barry Lynn, no matter what the hell he CALLS himself, has proven himself to be rediculously anti-Religious. Look at his track record, if you don't believe me.

(And "Religion in public life" does not cleanly relate to "Sex in public life". Can you guess which one is a health risk, and which one is just irrational sensitivity?)

;) ttt (Unrepentant_r_epublican)

[Maceman]

People who want to limit sexual expression in public places aren't necessarily anti-sex.

These kids have an absolute right to pray. The bus driver is not leading them. The school has no right to tell them to stop, or to harrass this bus driver.

[Mr. Lucky]

I don't intend this personally, but your quip illustrates why libertarians aren't considered a particularly serious political movement.

[Texas_Jarhead]

"People who want to limit sexual expression in public places aren't necessarily anti-sex.

The worst attempt at moral equivalence ever. bravo.