Posted on 12/10/2001 9:59:26 AM PST by Nachum
Of 475 Palestinian villages known to have existed before 1948, 385 have been destroyed, some without so much as a stone to mark their past existence.
Well golly! The Arabs attacked Israel the day she was born and war is what they got. Most of these villages are places the Arab masses fled from as their leaders exhorted them to leave Israel and return with the triumphant Arab armies. Only problem being that Israel won.
Same as the Pallies are whining now that their intifada has turned to drek. And Israel has them under siege instead of the other way around. Pallies tried to drive the Jews out of Gaza and the West Bank and it flopped big time.
MEANWHILE:
What do you have to say about the 800,000 Jews who were driven from the Arab nations. Made into penniless refugees? I can never get an answer from you on this one.
I don't know about this technique giving one popularity, but I do know this technique is the favored technique of the Israel First crowd, especially when they are responding to someone critical of Israel's policies, or when they have no substantive response, which is quite often!
One person, believe it was dennisw, said that Norman Finkelstein proving the Joan Peter's book a fraud, was "a lie!" The funny thing about this is Dr. Finkelstein disproved the Peter's book in his doctoral dissertation at Princeton! Imagine, Princeton's doctoral review board being so incompetent as to let such lies to pass!(sarcasm) But as you say, it is convenient to label any opponent a liar.
Don't hold your breath! I'm still waiting for the New York Times to admit their reporter, Walter Durranty, lied about and thus was culpable in the death, by starvation, of an estimated 6 to 9 million Ukrainians in the Artificial Famine of 1932/3 in Ukraine!
Of course the owner of the times liked old "Uncle Joe" Stalin, who could do no wrong! Stalin sent his henchman, Lazar Kaganovich to oversee the pogrom, and recently the Ukraine Academy of Science reported the 80% of the Cheka (secret police) were Jewish.
Hell will freeze over before Hollywood does this story, or a reporter makes a documentary of it!
Now someone is going to call me "anti-semitic." I most definitely am not! I grew up during the ecumenical movement of the Catholic church, attending a parochial school. My wife is a Taiwanese computer engineer; in high school my father said he wouldnt't object to my dating my black lab partner, when I asked if he thought it ok, if I decided to date this cute girl. My best adult friend is a Sikh Indian from the Punjab, India. I helped produce a TV show, with a Jewish couple, who were also close friends before a divorce. Hardly the profile of a white supremicist!
The upshot is this: One textbook used in my university English course had a section on techniques of propaganda, one of them being "stacking the deck." As you may recall this is telling a lot of one side of a story and leaving out the other. Seems our media has left out a lot of relevant history from the 20th century! I would like to see the complete history told! No more stacking the deck! Not in Ukraine! Not in Palestine/Israel!
Maybe we should ask for compensation for the 9,000,000 killed in Ukraine's Artificial Famine of 1932/3! Or how about these!:
Sack: An Eye for an Eye
John Sack In 1945 Poland's new Soviet-dominated government was actively recruiting Jews for its Office of State Security to carry out its own trademark brand of brutal "deNazification." The Office's agents raided German homes, rounding up some 200,000 men, women, children and infants - 99 percent of them non-combatant, innocent civilians. Incarcerated in cellars, prisons, and 1,255 concentration camps where typhus was rampant and torture was commonplace, the inmates subsisted on starvation rations. In this brief period, between 60,000 and 80,000 Germans perished at the hands of the Office. 'An Eye for an Eye' tells the little-known story of how Jewish victims of the Third Reich inflicted equally terrible suffering on innocent Germans. To unearth it, the author, a veteran journalist and war correspondent, spent seven years conducting research and interviews in Poland, Germany, Israel and the United States. Author John Sack focuses on such figures as Shlomo Morel, a commandant who bragged: "What the Germans couldn't do in five years at Auschwitz, I've done in five months at Schwientochlowitz." Not for 60 years has a book been so diligently (and, in the end, unsuccessfully) suppressed as 'An Eye for an Eye'. One major newspaper, one major magazine, and three major publishers paid $40,000 for it but were scared off. One printed 6,000 copies, then pulped them. Two dozen publishers read 'An Eye for an Eye' and praised it. "Shocking," "Startling," "Astonishing," "Mesmerizing," "Extraordinary," they wrote to the author, but all two dozen rejected it. When it was finally published by Basic Books, it "sparked a furious controversy" (Newsweek). And while it became a best-seller in Europe, it was so shunned in America that it also became, in the words of New York magazine, "The Book They Dare Not Review." Since then, both '60 Minutes' and 'The New York Times' have corroborated Sack's riveting expose of atrocities by vengeful Jews against German civilians in Communist-ruled Poland.
An Eye for an Eye
The Story of Jews Who Sought Revenge for the Holocaust
Mere trifles, dennisw doesn't have time for such facts.
Nor has he had time to check the latest information from Israeli archives that prove the aggressor in the 1948 war was actually Israel!
Can be found at the following link:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.