Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PENTAGON: CLINTON FAILED TO REBUILD OR MAINTAIN US STOCKPILE OF FUEL AIR EXPLOSIVES
Pentagon | 12/10/01

Posted on 12/10/2001 8:39:27 AM PST by Steven W.

Military analysts had long predicted that a key weapon in the US arsenal that would be deployed against caves and other hidden, underground AlQaeda hideouts would be Fuel Air Explosives (FAE). Similar in their degree of potential devestation as the 15000 lb. "daisy cutter" bombs, the Fuel Air Explosives rely on an in-air explosion which would remove all available oxygen from the terrorists hiding in caves & (if not killing them) force them out into the open.

While ferocious bombing of such caves has taken place over the past week at Tora Bora, however, there's been no report of these valuable tools have yet to be employed by the US military. Today, when Cmdr. John Stufflebeem was asked about their usage, the Pentagon revealed the reason: During the eight years of the Clinton administration, the DoD was unable to procure or rebuild our supply of these weapons which, like other munition systems, had been totally depleted during the Gulf War a decade ago.

Similar problems have arisen during the Afghanistan campaign, with the (Washington Times previously reporting US) Navy running out of PGM (Programmable Guided Munitions) early on in the campaign and having to turn to the Air Force for resupply, with the Air Force's former stockpile had also been largely depleted during the Kosovo air campaign. The US faces similar problems with the largely depleted numbers of Cruise Missiles, a favorite tool of distraction for the Clinton Administration, who relied on them frequently during periods of investigation such as points of key testimony during Clinton's impeachment. Thus it was also no surprise that the US has relied considerably on UK + NATO allies for submarine based munitions.

But this latest Pentagon admission, that the US has not resupplied such valuable tools as FAE's over the past eight years, is just further evidence of the degree to which the Clintons thoroughly abused this country and left the US military in a total state of need & neglect.


TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; talibanlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last
When the DoD releases the transcript of today's Pentagon briefing, this fact of Clinton neglect should be broadcast wide & clear. Outrageous!
1 posted on 12/10/2001 8:39:28 AM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
He really is scum...........but i also put blame on the military leaders they could have spoke up
2 posted on 12/10/2001 8:43:37 AM PST by classygreeneyedblonde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
The US faces similar problems with the largely depleted numbers of Cruise Missiles, a favorite tool of distraction for the Clinton Administration, who relied on them frequently during periods of investigation such as points of key testimony during Clinton's

Are these freeper words or straight from the Pentagon ? The knives are really coming out if the above is a direct quote.

3 posted on 12/10/2001 8:44:27 AM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
I caught that on TV this morning. What's the dif between a Daisy cutter and a FAE? I thought they were one and the same.
4 posted on 12/10/2001 8:45:44 AM PST by Bill Rice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: classygreeneyedblonde
they were! and who would listen? the media covered/covers for clinton and his traitor "wife"
6 posted on 12/10/2001 8:47:54 AM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
It will take a long time for us to realize every facet of just how weak that SOB left us, and a longer time perhaps to fully make up and recover for it.
7 posted on 12/10/2001 8:47:59 AM PST by StoneColdGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Another Clinton/Gore memmory.
8 posted on 12/10/2001 8:48:48 AM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
Above is ALL my characterization & reporting of what Pentagon said. Stufflebeem was asked if they were being used and he stated bluntly, that, no, the US had not had any inventory of them since it was depleted during gulf war.
9 posted on 12/10/2001 8:48:57 AM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
There was an article some time ago, entitled: "Where Have all the generals gone?" Aparently under Clinton, there was a mass resignation of 23 Generals and Admirals who protested Clinton's abuse of the military. It didn't get much play in the regular media.
10 posted on 12/10/2001 8:49:01 AM PST by Utopia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
Is a cigar considered a fuel air explosive?
11 posted on 12/10/2001 8:49:39 AM PST by NC Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proud patriot
given that he protested AGAINST the US and smoked dope and american flags during vietnam, i would not be surprised by anything, hes a mole, he is anti america, he wanted the presidency for 2 things: power, and to harm us as much as possible. hes a damn traitor!!
12 posted on 12/10/2001 8:49:41 AM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: classygreeneyedblonde
He really is scum...........but i also put blame on the military leaders they could have spoke up

How? If the Commander of the US Armed forces doesn't want to listen to his cabinet generals, what are they to do? Publicly? That's one way to get reassigned to ice station zebra very quickly. Nothing like publicly criticizing your Commander, and making them have to possibly act, and expecting a reward.

I blame the congress, who is supposed to be OF THE PEOPLE, and FOR THE PEOPLE, and to which is passed the duty to protect the people. Instead we’re seeing tax money go to milk in VT, herbal aromatherapy for low-income housing people, and a variety of other pork barrel items.

13 posted on 12/10/2001 8:50:24 AM PST by zandtar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utopia
EXACTLY!! "didnt get much play in the media!" wow, such a huge surprise!! /////
14 posted on 12/10/2001 8:50:41 AM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bill Rice
A Daisy Cutter is a very large convention bomb.

FAE is a muntion that releases a cloud of flammable droplets over the target and then is ignited, it creates enough pressure to detonate mines and sucks up all the oxygen in the immediate area, think naplam that doen't need to hit the ground to explode.

15 posted on 12/10/2001 8:50:42 AM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bill Rice
What's the dif between a Daisy cutter and a FAE?

The BLU-82 is a conventional, but very large, iron bomb.

The FAE is a much smaller bomb that spreads aerosolized fuel (ether, propane, depends on who designed it) and a small charge to ignite the fuel that is suspended in the air.

/john

16 posted on 12/10/2001 8:50:52 AM PST by JRandomFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: zandtar
YOU GOT THAT RIGHT!!!
17 posted on 12/10/2001 8:51:21 AM PST by nocommies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bill Rice
The press has not been very good in outlining the distinctions between the two. The daisy cutters are like dropping a (conventional) 15000 lb. McVeigh OKC bomb. The FAE's are like dispersing gasoline and then igniting it. The latter was potentially particularly valuable because it would suck the O2 out of the air in the caves and make the terrorists vulnerable to lack of air no matter how deep they were. Daisy Cutters are just like (really, really) big bombs.
18 posted on 12/10/2001 8:51:45 AM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: proud patriot
Do people here think that Clinton was actually taking orders from a foreign power?

I find that hard to believe. Maybe he was just checking with the Chinese on what their preferences were. Or maybe he was taking orders in the sense of "takeout" rather than command--as in "I'd like a missle/satellite navigation, comrade." In any event, he might as well have been directly working for anyone but us, whether he did so consciously or not.

19 posted on 12/10/2001 8:52:25 AM PST by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Beat me by mere seconds it seems. And your explanation was better written. Tip 'o the hat.

/john

20 posted on 12/10/2001 8:53:12 AM PST by JRandomFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-188 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson