Corporations, with government participation, have become the American equivalent of Soviet collective farms and industries. They have become bureaucracies with no accountability to their workers, stealing their pension funds, and absconding with funds for the elite executives.
Enron is a perfect example of the modern corporation, furnishing campaign funds for the use of complicit politicians to advance the fascist scheme for transnational corporations and world government. The biggest problem they face is the deteriation of production and the loss of purchasing power for their workers who cease to buy their products.
The law of diminshing returns is starting to show up in the corporate profit pictures. This is causing the current recession and promises to get worse. The private sector of individual entreprenuers is the only hope for the rejuvenation of our economy as the corporations continue to go down.
by Molly Ivins
The Establishment media, sucking its collective thumb with unwonted solemnity, is treating us to meditations on two themes: "How the mighty have fallen" and "Who would have thunk it?" Pardon me while I snort, in lieu of ruder noises, and offer two themes of my own: "What took so long?" and "Anyone with an ounce of common sense."
If you want to know what this story is about, pretend that Bill Clinton is still president. Pretend that Clinton's long-time, all-time biggest campaign contributor - a guy for whom Clinton has carried water for over the years, a guy with unparalleled "access," a shaper of policy, a man with a veto on regulatory appointments affecting his business, with connections at every level of the administration, a political fixer beyond the wildest dreams of James Riady - imagine that this guy's worldwide empire has tumbled into bankruptcy in just three months amid cascading reports of lies, monumental accounting errors, evasions, iffy financial statements, insider deals, a board of directors rife with conflicts of interest, top executives bailing out with millions while regular employees see their life savings shrink to nothing. Imagine all this back in the day of Bill Clinton.
Holy moley, we'd have four congressional investigations, three special prosecutors, two impeachment inquiries and a partridge in a pear tree by now. The Republicans would all be drumming their heels on the floor in full tantrum.
But this is not President Clinton; it is President Bush - so of course different standards must apply. The fact that Ken Lay, Enron's chairman, has been Bush's chief money man and key backer since he first went into politics is mentioned only in passing. The media don't want to be impolite. They have been credulously swallowing Enron's PR and overlooking the obvious for years.
The main problem with Enron is that it has never produced much of anything in the way of either goods or services; it has not added a single widget to the world widget supply. Enron is in the business of "financializing," making markets, trading in wholesale electricity, water, data storage, fiber optics - just about anything. One Enron executive told The New York Times that the company's achievement was to create "a regulatory black hole" to suit its "core management philosophy, which was to be the first mover into a market and to make money in the initial chaos and lack of transparency."
Enron started as a gas pipeline company that went into trading natural gas, and even then the company's critics claimed that Enron was making profits by stoking volatility in gas prices. The same charge showed up again in spades with the newly deregulated electricity markets. Enron had lobbied for utility deregulation relentlessly, formidably and very expensively at both the state and national levels.
The company seemed to spend more time influencing government than doing business. Like Long Term Capital Management, the hedge fund that went awry, it seemed to have only a parasitic relationship to actual economic activity. The problem with deregulating utilities is the reason that they were regulated in the first place: Monopoly power and the threat of market manipulation are a set-up for unholy price-gouging. How many times do we have to relearn that lesson?
Just a few spiffy eye-openers on Enron's connections:
* Lay and Enron together donated $2 million to Bush. In 2000, a company memo that was an open strong-arm recommended that employees give campaign checks for Bush to the political action committee; low-level managers were urged to contribute $500 and senior executives at least $5,000. Another $1 million was given to mostly Republican congressional candidates. It gave more money last cycle than any other energy company.
* Lawrence B. Lindsey, Bush's top economic adviser, got $50,000 from Enron in 2000 for consulting, presumably giving the company the same excellent economic advice now proving so healthy for the nation's economy.
* Karl Rove, Bush's top political strategist, sold between $100,000 and $250,000 worth of Enron stock earlier this year after being accused of conflict of interest.
* The California Legislature passed a contempt motion against Enron for failure to respond to a June 11 subpoena. The Legislature is investigating whether power-generating companies willfully manipulated the electricity supply in order to drive up prices last year.
* Lay was the only energy executive to meet alone with Vice President Dick Cheney while Cheney was drawing up a new national energy policy in secret.
* Enron influenced public policy time and again while Bush was governor here, including the infamous "grandfathered plants" deal. In 1997, Lay asked Bush to contact every member of the Texas delegation to explain how "export credit agencies of the United States are critical to U.S. developers like Enron, pursuing international projects in developing countries." These agencies provide political risk coverage and financial support to U.S. companies abroad. It's called corporate welfare.
* In Texas, Enron was a major player during the utilities deregulation debate, for which Bush lobbied actively, and, of course, in "tort reform," making it harder to sue corporations for the damage they do.