Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Civil Rights Appointee Denied Seat by Commission, Refused Recognition
AP ^ | 12/7/01 | Will Lester

Posted on 12/07/2001 8:13:22 AM PST by Jean S

WASHINGTON (AP) - The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights refused Friday to seat - or even recognize - a new commissioner appointed by President Bush.

Cleveland labor lawyer Peter Kirsanow watched quietly from the audience as attempts by the three Republican commissioners to have him seated or acknowledged were repeatedly voted down 5-3. Kirsanow attempted to vote for the first 10 minutes of the session but he was ignored and eventually sat silent as his allies continued debate.

The meeting opened with an attempt by Republican commissioners to adjourn until the dispute over the commission's makeup is resolved. But Chairwoman Mary Frances Berry persuaded the commission to reject that effort, saying it is impossible to know when the legal dispute will be resolved.

Berry recounted how President Reagan fired her in 1983 and how she fought through the courts to get back on the board.

She said accepting the White House or Justice Department interpretation of the law on the commission's makeup "would threaten the very independence of the commission."

Commissioner Christopher Edley, an ally of Berry, said he has told House Democratic leader Dick Gephardt that the White House is trying to reshape the commission in an apparent retribution for some of his work.

Berry - a frequent critic of the 2000 elections and particularly of Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, younger brother of the president - presides over a panel on which six commissioners lean Democratic and two lean Republican. The White House has already announced it plans to appoint Jennifer Cabranes Braceras to replace Yvonne Lee, whose term is expiring in early December. If Kirsanow is seated, the commission would be split 4-4.

Kirsanow was sworn in Thursday night to fill the seat of Victoria Wilson, an independent whose term, the White House says, expired Nov. 29.

White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said there was no legal merit to Berry's claim that Wilson's term has not expired, noting a ruling by the Justice Department's legal counsel and Clinton administration records that indicate it has expired. He denied rough politics on the White House's part, saying Kirsanow was installed within the letter of the law.

Berry said the White House's moves were "about muzzling us and it's scary to have them take all of this time and energy. It makes me even more afraid for the preservation of the commission."

The dispute between the Republican White House and a prominent black civil rights leader surprised the Bush team.

By taking the disputed seat held by Wilson, Kirsanow, a member of the largely conservative Center for New Black Leadership, would effectively rein in Berry's power over the commission.

The Bush administration maintains Wilson's term ended Nov. 29, when the term of the man she succeeded, Judge A. Leon Higginbotham Jr., would have expired. Higginbotham died in 1998.. This expiration date was spelled out in the Clinton administration's paperwork on Wilson's appointment, the White House says.

Berry argued the documents are wrong and are trumped by federal law, which says new commissioners will fill a six-year term.

Democratic Reps. John Conyers of Michigan and Jerrold Nadler of New York wrote Berry on Thursday to say the law as amended in 1994 reflects her interpretation.

The commission received a letter from the Justice Department late Thursday informing Berry that she is not allowed to retain outside legal help without Attorney General John Ashcroft's permission. Berry rejected that opinion.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: civilrights; kirsanow; maryfrancesberry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-340 next last
To: JeanS
abolish the commission !!!!!!
41 posted on 12/07/2001 8:29:39 AM PST by mbb bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
"Either send in U.S. Marshalls and arrest Berry or disband the Commission."

May I be so bold as to suggest both.

42 posted on 12/07/2001 8:29:52 AM PST by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: deport
I think Berry is committing "malfeasance in office".
my comment "you are right" was in reference to Bush forcing them to go to court vs. administration.
43 posted on 12/07/2001 8:30:35 AM PST by Steven W.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
So who is racist? When did President Bush and Attorney General Ashcroft step down and make Ms. Berry king? Get a court order and have them escorted out by US Marshals (don't forget to videotape the peacful removal to prevent Dim spin).
44 posted on 12/07/2001 8:30:55 AM PST by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
So what? When has concern for the law stopped the Rats from doing what they want. It certainly never stopped X42 and we all know he took pleasure in raping the Constitution and the laws for the rest of his time in office. Same with Madame De La Farge... er Berry of the U.S Civil Rights Commission and her comrades in arms.
45 posted on 12/07/2001 8:31:24 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Media coverage of human rights issues examined at UN forum
46 posted on 12/07/2001 8:31:35 AM PST by expose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
I happen to agree with the school that favors disbanding the entire commission. I fail to see what purpose a federally appointed board serves when all it does is listen to the gripes of minorities. In fact, everyone of their hearings in the past couple of years has been about how blacks have been denied their fare piece of the pie in this country.
47 posted on 12/07/2001 8:31:44 AM PST by Right of Buchannan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
I agree. That does sound like the way to go.
48 posted on 12/07/2001 8:32:00 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Looks like it's no accident that Berry's initials are M.F.B.!
49 posted on 12/07/2001 8:32:26 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Cut off the money - that always works. If trying to avoid an open battle, just lose the paperwork, nitpick etc. No sinecure, no reason to be on this passe board.
50 posted on 12/07/2001 8:32:32 AM PST by Let's Roll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: deport
Not more than four members shall at any one time be of the same political party.

And there are how many 'RATS on the commission???? Hmmmm.

51 posted on 12/07/2001 8:34:01 AM PST by Carolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
I'm voting for "neglect of duty" myself - as the head of the commission, surely it's her duty to seat the duly appointed commissioner.
52 posted on 12/07/2001 8:35:00 AM PST by nina0113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"the White House is trying to reshape the commission in an apparent retribution for some of his work...."

And how is this any freeking different from the Liberal wankers on the commission trying to retain the shape of the commission in an apparent retribution for George Bush WINNING the 2000 Election?

53 posted on 12/07/2001 8:35:03 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Let's Roll
Secretive swearing-in installs Bush man on civil rights panel
54 posted on 12/07/2001 8:35:04 AM PST by expose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Defiant
You are so right. If we don't do anything about this NOW we will lose all of the battles everywhere and our country to the bargain. This is what happens when little people get big jobs. You can see where Pres. Reagan was right in getting rid of this person.
55 posted on 12/07/2001 8:35:17 AM PST by broomhilda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
To be perfectly frank -

Is it any wonder that the black/white divide is getting wider all the time?

It's just another example of why we are "dis-integrating" as a country.

This is behavior similar to that of the boneheads with ultra-loud stereos in their cars that make the pictures on your walls bounce as they drive by. I've often wondered what I'd get if I blasted Mozart's Don Giovanni at max volume down in the 'hood?

Total and complete disregard for the normal, and necessary, COURTEOUS conduct of a polite society.

prambo

56 posted on 12/07/2001 8:36:02 AM PST by prambo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
This is staged, she must have gotten her orders from some uppers.
57 posted on 12/07/2001 8:36:43 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maryz
Found bits and pieces of info at several websites:

When the forces of darkness won the 1980 election, she promptly declared war on the Reagan administration. In 1984, fed to the gills with her noisy attacks on his civil rights policies, President Reagan fired her.

As Dr. Berry tells it, President Reagan informed her that "I was serving at his pleasure, and I wasn't giving him any pleasure."

Sadly, the firing didn't take. Dr. Berry sued, and was swiftly reinstated. In 1993, Bill Clinton named her chairman of the Civil Rights Commission.

Source

The Berry who fought to defend the Civil Rights Commission against President Reagan's appointees and Reagan himself as they sought to abolish both affirmative action and the commission. For that, Reagan tried to fire her.

Source

Berry, who has served on the nation's civil rights commission since 1980, gained notoriety in 1983 when she sued President Reagan for firing her along with several other outspoken critics of his administration's civil rights policies. Berry won the lawsuit and was reinstated by a federal district court.

Source

58 posted on 12/07/2001 8:36:47 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carolina
The way they got around that was that Berry and some other Clinton appointee on the board claimed to be "independent."
59 posted on 12/07/2001 8:36:55 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
I saw that report on Fox as well. Berry is claiming that the Clinton appointment papers were in error by stating an ending date. I guess she's going down the bureaucratic snafu storyline.
60 posted on 12/07/2001 8:37:18 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-340 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson