Posted on 12/07/2001 8:13:22 AM PST by Jean S
WASHINGTON (AP) - The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights refused Friday to seat - or even recognize - a new commissioner appointed by President Bush.
Cleveland labor lawyer Peter Kirsanow watched quietly from the audience as attempts by the three Republican commissioners to have him seated or acknowledged were repeatedly voted down 5-3. Kirsanow attempted to vote for the first 10 minutes of the session but he was ignored and eventually sat silent as his allies continued debate.
The meeting opened with an attempt by Republican commissioners to adjourn until the dispute over the commission's makeup is resolved. But Chairwoman Mary Frances Berry persuaded the commission to reject that effort, saying it is impossible to know when the legal dispute will be resolved.
Berry recounted how President Reagan fired her in 1983 and how she fought through the courts to get back on the board.
She said accepting the White House or Justice Department interpretation of the law on the commission's makeup "would threaten the very independence of the commission."
Commissioner Christopher Edley, an ally of Berry, said he has told House Democratic leader Dick Gephardt that the White House is trying to reshape the commission in an apparent retribution for some of his work.
Berry - a frequent critic of the 2000 elections and particularly of Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, younger brother of the president - presides over a panel on which six commissioners lean Democratic and two lean Republican. The White House has already announced it plans to appoint Jennifer Cabranes Braceras to replace Yvonne Lee, whose term is expiring in early December. If Kirsanow is seated, the commission would be split 4-4.
Kirsanow was sworn in Thursday night to fill the seat of Victoria Wilson, an independent whose term, the White House says, expired Nov. 29.
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said there was no legal merit to Berry's claim that Wilson's term has not expired, noting a ruling by the Justice Department's legal counsel and Clinton administration records that indicate it has expired. He denied rough politics on the White House's part, saying Kirsanow was installed within the letter of the law.
Berry said the White House's moves were "about muzzling us and it's scary to have them take all of this time and energy. It makes me even more afraid for the preservation of the commission."
The dispute between the Republican White House and a prominent black civil rights leader surprised the Bush team.
By taking the disputed seat held by Wilson, Kirsanow, a member of the largely conservative Center for New Black Leadership, would effectively rein in Berry's power over the commission.
The Bush administration maintains Wilson's term ended Nov. 29, when the term of the man she succeeded, Judge A. Leon Higginbotham Jr., would have expired. Higginbotham died in 1998.. This expiration date was spelled out in the Clinton administration's paperwork on Wilson's appointment, the White House says.
Berry argued the documents are wrong and are trumped by federal law, which says new commissioners will fill a six-year term.
Democratic Reps. John Conyers of Michigan and Jerrold Nadler of New York wrote Berry on Thursday to say the law as amended in 1994 reflects her interpretation.
The commission received a letter from the Justice Department late Thursday informing Berry that she is not allowed to retain outside legal help without Attorney General John Ashcroft's permission. Berry rejected that opinion.
What's not clear to me -- if anyone recalls -- is, if she was appointed in 1980, shouldn't her term have expired in 1986? Surely Reagan wouldn't have reappointed her. Was there a hiatus in her "service" from 1986 until Clinton dredged her up again in 1993?
Ms. Berry will not know what hit her....
I'm all for that. Anything that dismantles a governmental agency, I'm generally for.
I try to personally visit my state senator and representative every year. The one message I deliver consistently from year to year, is that they should find some facet of government and get rid of it. My example is agricultural assistance agents for urban / suburban counties. Having a agent of government around to tell me what to do to my soil to grow better fescue is not a proper funtion of government, but a function of Pikes Nurseries, the Home Depot garden department, etc.
Isn't "Queen of the Mau-Maus" more like it?
That was a really bad group--makes Mugabe's savages, the "veterans", look like pikers.
My screen name comes from a similar experience, albeit much earlier. I started drifting from the 'rats when they embraced a known Liar as their party leader back in '92. Now I am happy to be a...
Recovering Democrat.
I was thinking "Queen of the Bow-Wow's"...Man, she FUGLY!
In light of Mary Frances Berry's highly irrational remarks to the President's Personal Counsel, today's public humiliation of the President's appointee at her behest, to say nothing of her shocking conduct of the Florida hearings and her post-hearing interviews ("I can do anything I want ..."), it is clear that she is easily the most dysfunctional individual in government today and should be forced to resign immediately. Who at the USCCR and Congress has the professional integrity to see that a more rational and responsible commissioner replaces her without delay? I'm sure she will have no trouble receiving the best psychiatric care a fat, federal pension can buy.
CH
Tucson, Arizona
Amazingly, she is under the impression that hs is a stupid cowboy. Foolish, foolish woman.
Since nothing happened that could be shown on television to the detriment of President Bush, there will be no coverage of this. There will continue to be no coverage unless Ms. Berry manages to manufacture a scene, which I am sure she will attempt. The President is very smart on this and will not take the bait.
Now I am sure some Bush-bashers will come along and tell us he backed down, or he is a wuss, or he is really a liberal, yada, yada. Bill Kristol will write a column criticizing him, and no doubt Larry Klaymamn will file a lawsuit against him.
I am always fascinated at how he solves things...often not in the usual manner.
Look for the GOP to retake the Senate and pick up 10+ seats in the House
Do you have any hard information, or is this wishful thinking? I am thinking the GOP loses the House and breaks even in the Senate - but that is based on my bright, sunny pessimism about whether the GOP can do anything right.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.