Skip to comments.
House Painter for Nicole Brown Had Serial Murder Background
'Cross Country Killer' -The Glen Rodgers Story ^
| December 5, 2001
| Joyce Spizer and Claude Rodgers Jr.
Posted on 12/05/2001 7:22:24 AM PST by codebreaker
The Cross Country Killer, the Glen Rodgers story provides an insighful look into the mind and making of an American predator.
Glen Rodgers, twice on America's most 10 Wanted List, is currently on Death Row in Florida.
He brags about having killed 70 people, one of which may have been Nicole Brown Simpson.
Could it be a coincedence she was murdered just after meeting Glen?
There are witnesses who saw them partying together and there's even a photo of them together.
A sad but fascinating story that will keep you mesmorized till the end.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-355 next last
To: codebreaker
Was it this guy's M.O. to slash the throats of his victims? The cuts on Nicole and Ron were, from a effectiveness point of view, very well executed. One of the reasons why I believe that O.J. could not have been the one to pull the knife.
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: jgoode
Ok you must have seen it happen then. How come you didn't get on the witness stand.
23
posted on
12/05/2001 7:34:37 AM PST
by
CJ Wolf
To: Paradox
OJ was inept at covering the crimescene up as he was acting in the 'Naked Gun' movies.
To: JohnGalt
>>Were you peddling the 'Kurt Cobain was murdered' angle a few years ago?<<
There goes that Kurt Cobain, shooting his mouth off.
sorry
To: codebreaker
HOW TO MAKE CONDI RICE PRESIDENT:(This is not a joke -
Is anyone from the White House lurking here?)
Get the President to issue a national security directive to get Juditha Brown's and Nicole Brown's phone records from the night of the murders.
These records are being suppressed because they would prove OJ didn't do it -
they were on the phone when OJ got into the limo for the airport.
Quietly, discreetly, send US Marshals to get those phone records in Texas.
Find out the truth and put it in a press conference, Condi.
Get your people off the Democratic plantation.
I guarantee there would be "Condi for Pres" bumper stickers the next day.
To: codebreaker
I love this site, don't get me wrong. But, the one thing thing I noticed is that people can be so nasty when they don't agree with an article posted. You can disagree without being disagreeable! Wonder how many people would have to eat their words if it is found out OJ is innocent? And would they do it as loudly as they condemned him?
To: codebreaker
BWaaahahahHAHAHA!
To: codebreaker
a house painter that can afford high dollar Italian Brono Whatever shoes?
29
posted on
12/05/2001 7:36:55 AM PST
by
putupon
To: jgoode
I have never been 100% convinced of OJ's guilt.He seems more like the "pay some guy to do it" kind of person.I didn't say he was innocent or that he didn't have knowledge about it,I just don't think he physicaly did the cuttin.It takes training and or experiance ,not to mention the mental strength and determination to kill with a knife,let alone two people.More to the OJ story than meets the eye IMHO.
To: japaneseghost
http://www.theojframeup.com/
To: Chemnitz
You do realize that none of O.J.'s blood was found at the scene until hours after he gave a sample to police. The detective that took the sample to the police department to be logged for evidence walked around for a couple of hours first with the vial in his jacket pocket, then lo and behold, there are a few drops on a gate and sidewalk that the police missed the previous three days. One of the top criminal forensics experts in the world then testified that the blood found on O.J.'s socks found laying on the cream carpet in his bedroom had the blood of Ron and Nicole pressed into it and there was no blood found on the carpeting. But anyway, you are right, O.J. did it, no need to examine the evidence.
To: codebreaker
Self-proclaimed serial killers have a history of taking credit for spectacular crimes they didn't commit. I'll believe this when the physical evidence connects him with the crime.
To: Old Hickory
You believe everything the police say. It's likely that they framed him because they 'thought' he did it. He was never found guilty. LAPD has already undergone a major overhaul because of similar frame ups. Read the news some time.
34
posted on
12/05/2001 7:38:28 AM PST
by
CJ Wolf
To: codebreaker
Sheeesh...how many obsessed, lowlife, serial killers just jump out of the bushes in highly affluent neighborhoods, slash a few strangers, then take off without savoring it? Gimme a Break!
To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
I think the House painter may have stolen the knife from O.J.'s Frogman movie that he was filming, O.J knew they would trace the weapon back to him, so he dumped it with the bloody clothes back at the airport.
To: japaneseghost
You've got to be kidding me. So, just how did OJ's shoes wind up in the blood? Also, why we has trying to get away in the Bronco?
To: codebreaker
No small coincidence that this story breaks just as OJ's butt is in a sling once again. hmmmmm. Maybe he hired Carville?
38
posted on
12/05/2001 7:40:47 AM PST
by
Roebucks
To: Jewels1091
O.J. WAS found guilty in the civil suit....remember?
sw
39
posted on
12/05/2001 7:40:59 AM PST
by
spectre
I'll probably get flamed for this, I know, but I do leave open the possibility that OJ didn't do it.
One possible explanation for the physical evidence linking him to the crime scene: He stumbled across the murders taking place, or soon after. He panicked, or didn't do anything to stop the murders out of fear, or tried to stop but couldn't, or did something else which would be embarrassing if discovered. His defense decided the best strategy is to admit to no presence at the crime scene whatsoever. Now he looks like a liar - but the alternative is admitting he was there, which obviously increases the chances of a jury looking at the physical evidence and concluding guilt on his part.
Like I said, it's merely a possible explanation. If I had to bet one way or the other, I'd still bet that OJ did it.
But it's far from a metaphysical certainty. And in some ways, I actually think it would be good (for the country) if it came out definitively that OJ didn't do it. For what it's worth....
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 341-355 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson