[biblewonk]

Sorry to disappoint you but learning WW's opinion on such things is not worth that much of my time. If you don't know that's fine. I think WW is too wise and too much into the bible to think that such things are OK.

[Protagoras]

Sorry to disappoint you but learning WW's opinion on such things is not worth that much of my time. If you don't know that's fine. I think WW is too wise and too much into the bible to think that such things are OK.

I'm not disappointed. It never occured to me that you would actually find out what the man really thinks, even though you said "he rocks".

You do not know what he thinks and you think it "not worth your time" to find out, but somehow you have come to the conclusion (with no data) that he is
A. wise
B. "Into the bible"

The next thing you need to do is not change the advocation of re-legalization of behaviors by individuals which do not violate the rights of others into "thinking such things are OK". It is very misleading to some people. (I am not one of those misled)

[Protagoras]

I stand corrected. You said Williams was "the man" not that "he rocks". I apologise for mixing you up with a poster on a different thread.

[Protagoras]

There are a lot of things that are not "OK" by me that I do not advocate the use of force to deter.

Since you are the bible wonk, maybe you could help me out with a few (in context) verses that quote Christ as having advocated human beings using force on other human beings to deter behaviors such as prostitution or use of mind altering substances. Thanks