Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bin Laden Nuke Bomb Shock ( "dirty bomb" was a factor in the terror alert )
skynews ^ | 12/04/2001 | Staff

Posted on 12/04/2001 12:48:36 AM PST by KQQL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: mxbluto
That's the reaction your leaders are hoping for. A bonus for them would be the whimpers and cries for protection.

Yeah, We know, it's all a plot to take away our freedoms, give us to the Red Chinese, the tin hat brigade could have stopped WTC all by itself, gotten Bin Laden, etc. Oh, I forgot, The US Gmvt did WTC as an excuse to take away more freedoms, etc. < /sarcasm>

21 posted on 12/04/2001 2:36:47 AM PST by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
"The concern is sufficiently deep that some countries have adopted extreme security procedures at their borders, including the increased use of devices that measure radioactivity."

That would be a "duh!" in most countries, but not our own.

22 posted on 12/04/2001 2:43:02 AM PST by LiberteeBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
The concern is sufficiently deep that some countries have adopted extreme security procedures at their borders, including the increased use of devices that measure radioactivity,

Gee....maybe we should do that too? < /sarcasm>

23 posted on 12/04/2001 2:44:51 AM PST by snorkeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: unix
Thank you for looking! A point I try to make is that WMD are at heart terror weapons, and the first step towards defusing that is education. I firmly believe the anthrax attacks were probing manuveres designed to gauge our response.
24 posted on 12/04/2001 2:45:00 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
I firmly believe the anthrax attacks were probing manuveres designed to gauge our response.

Bingo!

Also the barbarians did what they did on Sept. 11 to determine how far they could go. I suspect they though Bush would be like Clinton: talk a good game, but in the end, bend over.

They were wrong!

25 posted on 12/04/2001 2:52:34 AM PST by bulldog905
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bulldog905
They were wrong!

Yes, they forgot that us 'decadent democracies' are a terrible thing when aroused. We pounded the Thousand-Year Reich into smoking rubble in less than 4 years. We can do this all over again, no sweat.

26 posted on 12/04/2001 2:59:21 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Thanks backhoe for the survival links and I bookmarked them for quick access. Charleston, WV has a big plant called, oops "loose lips" but in India a few years ago there was a "small" leak from the very same plant that is in Charleston that killed thousands of people and to think what could happen if this large plant was attacked. Super yikes. BTW I like your articles and comments I think you add some good insight to the forum. Thanks again.
27 posted on 12/04/2001 3:49:04 AM PST by 4wvueers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: abwehr
Rather, officials say they suspect negligence by a member of the department’s Nuclear Emergency Search Team, NEST, which is located at the lab and is trained to respond to nuclear terrorist incidents and other nuclear emergencies.

That has nothing to do with the discussion of Bin Laden and dirty bombs.

28 posted on 12/04/2001 4:32:47 AM PST by FreeLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
"...Osama bin Laden is closer than first thought to developing a crude nuclear weapon..."

Wow! sounds serious!

"It said a diagram of a "dirty bomb" was found in a Taliban or al Qaeda installation in Afghanistan in recent weeks."

You mean they were all the way up to drawing pictures?!

"The so-called dirty bomb could be made by taking highly radioactive material, such as spent reactor fuel rods,
and wrapping it around readily-available conventional explosives."

I wonder if a written description like the one above qualifies as "evidence" of developing a weapon of mass destruction.
If this is an example of the sort of thing that the fed is calling "developement" then I would like to see some of the other
"evidence" that they are using to justify that "patriot act".
Sounds like the fed is into fear-propaganda.
29 posted on 12/04/2001 4:35:10 AM PST by freefly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snorkeler
Must be the Canadian/US Border. Supposedly National Guard and Helicopters will be patrolling. This speaks for itself as to where they will enter. I am crossing the border for the holidays Saturday.....will inform those here of what I encounter.
30 posted on 12/04/2001 4:43:10 AM PST by American in Canada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: American in Canada
I am crossing the border for the holidays Saturday.....will inform those here of what I encounter.

Did same earlier this fall from a camping/canoeing excursion. They asked us to open our suitcases and rubbermaid storage bins and they poked around in them. I wouldn't attempt to take any booze, cigs or firearms across the border--they're being much more thorough than they usually are. Luckily, they didn't confiscate our many cans of maple syrup--yum.

31 posted on 12/04/2001 4:50:44 AM PST by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
"It would just make for an environmental mess, but again, over a relatively small area."

kind of like Love Canal?

32 posted on 12/04/2001 4:52:02 AM PST by paulsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: 4wvueers
I certainly appreciate your kind words.... I do my dam'dest, for an old ex-wrecker operator, to spread information- the most valuable commodity. During the nearly nine years I drove that old red truck all over the South, I got to meet a lot of people, and you know what? Most Americans are really fine folks... better, IMHO, than most of our so-called "leaders."
33 posted on 12/04/2001 4:54:00 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
"it's all a plot to take away our freedoms,"

The "patriot act" DID take away your freedoms.
Was it a plot? Doesn't matter. You still lost them.

"...give us to the Red Chinese,..."

That happened on clinton's watch.
Of course, nobody wants to talk about it now.
Let alone do anything.

"...the tin hat brigade could have stopped WTC all by itself..."

I havn't heard that one. But armed flight crews certainly could have.
Or passengers that weren't taught to be victims.

"...gotten Bin Laden, etc..."

Cutting off his funding when he was 1st labeled a "terrorist" years ago would have made him irrelevant.

"I forgot, The US Gmvt did WTC as an excuse to take away more freedoms, etc."

Well, the fbi DID run the sting operation that resulted in the 1st WTC bombing.
What their reasoning was for refusing to allow the explosives to be exchanged for inert material has yet to be made public.

Surely the fed isn't interested in circumventing it's Constitutional restraints
and expanding it's power and influence over the citizens of this country?
We have no evidence that it is happening so far, do we?
34 posted on 12/04/2001 4:54:43 AM PST by freefly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
I repeat, this article is a crock.

maybe,maybe not never the less all possible scenerio's should be looked at.

35 posted on 12/04/2001 4:57:54 AM PST by MetalHeadConservative35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
"I got to meet a lot of people, and you know what? Most Americans are really fine folks...
better, IMHO, than most of our so-called "leaders."

VERY true.
And it can probably be said about people throughout most of the world.
It's seldom the people who are the problem, it's "leaders" and their propaganda" that create the problems.

Also, thank you for the links...
I print off a lot of that info and hand it out. As you said, education is the key.
We are a lot more effective at providing ourselves with protection than the government could ever be.
36 posted on 12/04/2001 5:03:42 AM PST by freefly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: freefly
Thank you for your efforts.... I really think getting people to learn how to educate themselves ( bypassing the corrupt, celebrity-worshipping media ) is the key to all this. And I agree with everything else you mentioned- I traveled a lot in younger days, and people are surprisingly decent everywhere I have been. A lot of the problems in the World are not from citizens, but rather from their dam' governments!
37 posted on 12/04/2001 5:14:48 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
-I guess it depends where it's set off and how. Like suppose they set one off at another place that has the potential to create more smoke and fire over an even larger area. Like, suppose they set one off at a LNG storage tank or refinery,or at one of the other chemical places you mentioned. Suppose it's attached to a rail tanker car and setoff as that car passes through another area with something else flammable/and or explosive in nature. An alternative might be setting one off in a major city's water reservoir. Hmmm, how about downtown wall street, how much collateral damage is there if that area was dirty nuked, even for only a few block area, and for how long would the "inconvenience" last.

Bottom line is these guys have proven that they are completely competent when it comes to the "force multiplier" effect. They tend to use one small attack to create a larger attack, which leads then again to an even larger final outcome. It's their variation-in a way- on the daisy cutter. A smaller bang leads to much larger results. Their attacks 'directly" seem to be primers for the real goal. One inch bladed knives led to what, 7 major US important buildings down, huge loss of life, and we are still under the ramifications of what happened. All from one inch long knives. If they can do that, starting out with a bigger weapon might be possible for them to have a huge outcome.

I'm not saying that it would be either totally devastating, but I guess I dispute the notion that it could "only" be minimal.

38 posted on 12/04/2001 5:15:19 AM PST by zog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: randita
Lat time we went to Canada (pre-911), we were towing our boat, packed with equipment and supplies and the Jeep was likewise. We weren't bothered on the way out or on the way back. I was sweating, but only because of all the work it would take to cram all that stuff back. We don't travel light (grin). We would do it differently now, for sure.
39 posted on 12/04/2001 5:23:12 AM PST by snorkeler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
If he has it, he will likely use it in pakistan , because hates them these days.

I agree. I think they are more likely to use it on one of our allies then they are to make it to the States with one. As m,uch as they hate us I am sure they hate muslim nations that help us even more.

40 posted on 12/04/2001 5:26:36 AM PST by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson