Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bin Laden Nuke Bomb Shock ( "dirty bomb" was a factor in the terror alert )
skynews ^ | 12/04/2001 | Staff

Posted on 12/04/2001 12:48:36 AM PST by KQQL

Bin Laden Nuke Bomb Shock

Evidence has emerged that Osama bin Laden is closer than first thought to developing a crude nuclear weapon. Fear that bin Laden's al Qaeda network might be close to developing a "dirty bomb" was a factor in the United States' decision to issue a new warning of possible attacks, the Washington Post reported.

Fuel rods

The so-called dirty bomb could be made by taking highly radioactive material, such as spent reactor fuel rods, and wrapping it around readily-available conventional explosives.

The newspaper said the alert was raised from interrogation of captured al Qaeda members and evidence gathered in the last month at al Qaeda facilities in Afghanistan by CIA officers and US special forces.

It said a diagram of a "dirty bomb" was found in a Taliban or al Qaeda installation in Afghanistan in recent weeks.

'Radioactivity'

"US intelligence agencies have recently concluded that Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda terrorist network may have made greater strides than previously thought toward obtaining plans or materials to make a crude radiological weapon that would use conventional explosives to spread radioactivity over a wide area," the Post said, quoting US and foreign sources.

"The concern is sufficiently deep that some countries have adopted extreme security procedures at their borders, including the increased use of devices that measure radioactivity."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 12/04/2001 12:48:36 AM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KQQL
"The concern is sufficiently deep that some countries have adopted extreme security procedures at their borders, including the increased use of devices that measure radioactivity."

Duh!

2 posted on 12/04/2001 12:51:42 AM PST by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
If he has it, he will likely use it in pakistan , because hates them these days.
3 posted on 12/04/2001 12:54:51 AM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
YIKES !
4 posted on 12/04/2001 1:00:19 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
super duper yikes!
5 posted on 12/04/2001 1:02:25 AM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
If he has it, he will likely use it in Pakistan , because OBL hates them these days.

I bet he never thought Pakistan would have supported the US.

6 posted on 12/04/2001 1:07:25 AM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Washington Post article:

U.S. Fears Bin Laden Made Nuclear Strides

Some of the conclusions come from interrogations of captured al Qaeda members or associates. Some come from evidence gathered in the last month on the ground in Afghanistan by CIA officers and U.S. Special Forces from former al Qaeda facilities.

In addition, recent U.S. intelligence reports describe a meeting within the last year in which bin Laden was present when one of his associates produced a canister that allegedly contained radioactive material. The associate waved the canister in the air as proof of al Qaeda's progress and seriousness in trying to build a nuclear device.

7 posted on 12/04/2001 1:08:01 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
If he has it, it is a sure bet that Iraq has a better model.
8 posted on 12/04/2001 1:08:05 AM PST by patj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: patj
yes, I agree with you.
9 posted on 12/04/2001 1:10:47 AM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Related post:

(New York) Harbor security tightens against nuclear threat

10 posted on 12/04/2001 1:12:37 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
Keep these handy, copy & resend to others:

Nuclear, Biological, & Chemical Warfare- Survival Skills, Pt. II

11 posted on 12/04/2001 1:18:35 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
That's the reaction your leaders are hoping for. A bonus for them would be the whimpers and cries for protection.
12 posted on 12/04/2001 1:19:40 AM PST by mxbluto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: patj
Perhaps a premptive strike.....
14 posted on 12/04/2001 1:55:31 AM PST by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
...spent reactor fuel rods, and wrapping it around readily-available conventional explosives.

What a crock! Merely having eye-contact with one of those rods for a few seconds is fatal. How are they going to

  1. Procure one in the first place. You can't just buy them at your local hardware store.
  2. Transport it to Afghanistan. You really don't want to check a 20' long hot, glowing rod with your baggage for the flight.
  3. Cut through the zirconium sheath to remove the spent fuel pellets.
  4. Handle the "bomb" when they had done all this?

I repeat, this article is a crock.

15 posted on 12/04/2001 2:06:47 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: KQQL
bump
17 posted on 12/04/2001 2:18:13 AM PST by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KQQL
The danger of these kinds of "dirty bombs" is less than the scaremongers in the media would have you believe.

Yes, you could spread radioactivity over an area. A relatively small area. Done just right, about the same size area as an accident in a chemical plant would endanger -- i.e., enough to displace a few hundred homes and a dozen or so businesses, but hardly any more damage than the sort we already take in stride when a train carrying tank cars of dangerous chemicals derails.

And like a chemical spill, the moment an attack like this occurs, the evacuations would start and the actual amount of danger to people would be low. It would just make for an environmental mess, but again, over a relatively small area.

Some uninformed alarmists have tried to paint pictures of millions of people with radiation poisoning and entire regions made uninhabitable, but that's simply ridiculous.

18 posted on 12/04/2001 2:23:41 AM PST by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: backhoe
backhoe, the links provided are excellent readings. Thanks for the continual posting of ths information.
20 posted on 12/04/2001 2:29:30 AM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson