The government treating us like a bunch of morons over an aviation disaster? I'm shocked! This is absolutely unprecedented! [/sarcasm]
To: Map Kernow
I heard that the Rockaway area was basically populated by firefighters and police...does anyone know if this is true?
To: Map Kernow
Is there a forum like FR where all witnesses can post their sightings? Its pretty obvious that the powers that be don't want all the details out there as it doesn't fit into their nice packaged stories.
4 posted on
12/02/2001 2:53:22 PM PST by
lelio
To: Map Kernow
Another mysterious center fuel tank explosion?
To: Map Kernow
Isn't that the same spin that was given for TWA Flight 700? Forgive me if I have the airline and flight number wrong. But I do remember many witnesses saying that they saw a projectile heading to the plane. Re: July 17.
To: Map Kernow
A neighbor who is a very level-headed American Airlines pilot told me that he's not convinced it was an accident. He said that, given the lack of security around the aircraft the night before the crash, it would have been very easy for a saboteur to make a few alterations on the plane. But he also said, sometimes freak accidents do happen.
BTW, he said he hates the Airbus and refuses to fly them.
To: Map Kernow
STEVE DUNLEAVY: Just another media puke!
22 posted on
12/02/2001 3:23:16 PM PST by
verity
To: Map Kernow
Steve Dunleavy is a reputable reporter, in my book (based on the Clinton scandals and other articles over the last 5 years I've seen). So this should be taken seriously.
The only way to prove or disprove this is to have non-NTSB, non-FBI, non-FAA, non-government aviation people look at the available wreckage and other evidence.
We all know that witnesses may be unreliable, and they can be lead by smart attorneys or politicians. These witnesses should give depositions under oath, as should the earlier ones who said the plane was intact before the tail came off. Not to prosecute them, but to get as much info into the public record as possible. The newspapers and TV guys like O'Reilly have to lead this, since it's obvious to most of us that the gummint is not capable of doing it.
If there were explosions on one side of the aircraft, then there should be debris on one side of the aircraft with burn/singe markings on it. There should be panels on the aircraft remains with evidence of an outward explosion, assuming that the crash and burn didn't destroy the pieces.
26 posted on
12/02/2001 3:44:55 PM PST by
RandyRep
To: Map Kernow
MK, "Who are you going to believe?? Me or your lieing eyes??" Peace and love, George.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson