Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What if 'China Attacks Taiwan!'
Parameters (US Army War College Quarterly) ^ | Autumn 2001 | Richard L. Russell

Posted on 12/02/2001 9:26:18 AM PST by Hopalong

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: Nitro
Are you saying that America should turn Her back on a friend?

Absolutely. A nation cannot be constrained by such niceties in pursuing its interest. The same kind of morality that exists between individuals cannot be applied to the relations between nation-states. That's classical realism, and the conservative approach to international relations and statecraft. Going to war with China is unneccessary, and maybe even a bad idea for us. Taiwanese aren't Americans, they're not worth the blood and treasure of America. Defend America, not the world!

21 posted on 12/02/2001 11:06:11 AM PST by wildconservatism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wildconservatism
A nation cannot be constrained by such niceties in pursuing its interest.

First of all, These United States can and should do exactly that!!

Secondly, General George S. Patton would slap your face!!

22 posted on 12/02/2001 11:16:53 AM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hopalong
Well Hopie, if China attacks Taiwan right now with all that is going on elsewhere, I suppose that would be a bad thing, huh? So many enemies, so little time.
23 posted on 12/02/2001 11:19:23 AM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildconservatism
NITRO: Are you saying that America should turn Her back on a friend?

YOU: Absolutely.

ME: *Picking myself up off the floor*

24 posted on 12/02/2001 11:19:36 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
First of all, These United States can and should do exactly that!!

That's not traditional statecraft. Nation-states have one reson for being: to defend their citizens and pursue the interests of their citizens. Without citizens, there are no nation-states. Nation-states therefore do not have the luxury of worrying about whether a given action in the global arena is "moral." You do what it takes to preserve the nation-state. If that means lying, lie. If it means cutting allies loose, cut 'em loose.

Secondly, General George S. Patton would slap your face!!

Which is why we have civilian control of the military. The job of the military is to go where it is ordered and kill people and break things. It is not their role to plot the next move of the nation on the chessboard of international relations.

25 posted on 12/02/2001 11:26:25 AM PST by wildconservatism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: wildconservatism
That's not traditional statecraft.

Exactly, America is abso-f*cking-lutely NON-traditional, that is exactly why we are what we are!

Every other Country would buckle under and go the easy way, NOT America we courted the hard way and we made it work, we will always make it work! Until people like you out-number people like me!

26 posted on 12/02/2001 11:36:23 AM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Stay with me, Howlin!!
27 posted on 12/02/2001 11:37:11 AM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hopalong
Nice of us to inspire the Chinese here like this.
28 posted on 12/02/2001 11:38:57 AM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
Honest to goodness.

In the words of Robert Redford as Butch in Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, "Who ARE these people?"

29 posted on 12/02/2001 11:39:32 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred; super175; Carry_Okie
"Well Hopie, if China attacks Taiwan right now with all that is going on elsewhere, I suppose that would be a bad thing, huh? So many enemies, so little time...."

Think so? For whom?

The ChiComs no doubt have many fantasies about how many "friends" they've made in the past, oh, fifty years.

Once did know a Hopi—rodeo clown. Ars est celare artem, or sumthin' like that. What surprised me most was that, as a passenger, he seemed to get a bit nervous about how fast I was driving acrost the desert.

Regards to all. S&W R.I.P.

30 posted on 12/02/2001 11:41:53 AM PST by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
Every other Country would buckle under and go the easy way, NOT America we courted the hard way and we made it work, we will always make it work! Until people like you out-number people like me!

I fear that your level of emotionalism, if it maintains sway over American foreign policy (as it admittedly seems to), will blind America to certain realities, and we'll wash up on the rocks. "We will always make it work" is what many a statesman has thought in history about his own country, before his country took one gamble too many and caused its power to fritter away, a has-been.

31 posted on 12/02/2001 11:42:18 AM PST by wildconservatism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Hopalong
What if?

Then I will respond the same way that the Taiwanese react to current war in Middle East.

Who cares?

32 posted on 12/02/2001 11:46:22 AM PST by Silas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; wildconservatism
To paraphrase "Butch and Sundance"....

Ya think there is enough Dynamite, Butch!!"

33 posted on 12/02/2001 11:47:13 AM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
I love that movie! I really liked "News."
34 posted on 12/02/2001 11:48:25 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
Fust we gotta discuss the rules....

Best regards. S&W R.I.P.

35 posted on 12/02/2001 11:48:53 AM PST by Hopalong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: wildconservatism
You know, if it wasn't for WWI and WWII I might say you have point!

We are the only "Cop on the Beat" and if we don't keep an eye out!!

Who will??

36 posted on 12/02/2001 11:50:29 AM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"News" Carver and "Flatnose!"

Also, don't forget the guy inside the freight-car, Woodcock!!

37 posted on 12/02/2001 11:52:57 AM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wildconservatism
I just noticed in this rant, you don't actually say USA!

You say statesman and country and other fearful words, where are you from, originally?

38 posted on 12/02/2001 11:55:36 AM PST by Nitro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Hopalong; Poohbah
...the Chinese would be mounting amphibious assaults against Taiwan's beaches. The amphibious landings could occur relatively soon...The limited coastlines and the Taiwanese military's long anticipation of these avenues of Chinese approach would make these landings extremely difficult for China's troops, but the Chinese might eventually overcome the island defenses with their sheer mass and the attrition of Taiwan's defenders.

Really?

In this entire scenario, the word "submarine" does not appear. Apparently the attack subs from the U.S. and Taiwan that constantly patrol the Straits will be on vacation that week.

39 posted on 12/02/2001 11:56:00 AM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nitro
If you'll hum the soundtrack, I believe we could act it out!
40 posted on 12/02/2001 11:57:17 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson