Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wallaby; Uncle Bill; golitely; LSJohn; Judge Parker; archy; Fred Mertz; ratcat; thinden; t-shirt...
_Jim in reply #10 is still desperately trying to score points but keeps losing. The government shill thug must feel emboldened by Mueller and Ashcroft efforts to create a police state to take out all of us who dare make all the Jims in the Fed bureacracy feel insecure and inferior.

Bush's advisor on the Third Way and Communitarianism in the White House is Don Eberly-see reference inside article.

Bush and the 'Third Way'

September 3, 2001

By Joseph Farah

© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com

The more of George W. Bush you see, the more he sounds like and governs like Bill Clinton – perhaps minus the personal indiscretions.

This is not my observation alone. Way back in February, Washington Post staff writer Dana Milbank focused on this in a front-page news story that should be required reading for all those getting ready to e-mail me angry missives.

In that story, the Post revealed that Bush has embraced many of the ideas in a political movement called "communitarianism," which, places the importance of society ahead of the unfettered rights of the individual.

I know some of you are disbelieving me already. You think I'm joking. You think I'm pulling your leg. You think I'm exaggerating. Again, please read the original news story on this for yourself before you rush to judgment. You can find the Washington Post story reprinted on the Communitarian Network's own website.

"This is the ultimate Third Way," explains Don Eberly, an adviser in the Bush White House, using, as the Post points out, a favorite phrase of Clinton.

According to the Post, and I concur with the reporter's analysis, "communitarianism" holds that "years of celebrating individual freedom have weakened the bonds of community and that the rights of the individual must be balanced against the interests of society as a whole."

Bush is reported to have consulted with leading communitarian thinker Robert D. Putnam on the crafting of his inaugural speech.

"Some of Bush's ideas are objectionable to civil liberties advocates and strict constitutionalists on the left and the right," explained the Post, "but they have broad support in both parties."

I should think such ideas would be objectionable to people committed to civil liberties and the Constitution. The ideas expressed are the antithesis of American values.

The article also says World magazine Editor Marvin Olasky, the man credited with inventing the term "compassionate conservative," is himself a communitarian. Olasky flat-out denies it, and I believe him. So, this does call into question some of the reporter's other assertions.

Maybe you're unfamiliar with this term, communitarian. It's not one we hear every day. I would suggest opening up your dictionary and looking it up. Here's what you will find under "communitarian" if you use Webster's New World, the preferred choice of U.S. newspaper people: "a member or advocate of a communistic or communalistic community."

That's it. No alternative definitions offered. But you choose any dictionary you like. I suspect you'll find a similar definition.

But we don't have to look it up in the dictionary to see the striking resemblance between communitarian thought and communist thought. Both center on the idea that the individual needs to be de-emphasized in favor of the "community" or the "state."

The best I can decipher of this popular new idea of communitarianism is that it is not a new idea at all. To put it in its simplest form, I would describe it as a form of communism for people who believe in God.

Now Bush makes more sense to me. I fully understand why I find his policies repulsive and nonsensical. I see clearly why he is an enemy of freedom.

You see, I like individual rights. I believe in individual rights with all my heart and soul. I believe it is one of the cornerstones of true freedom, as articulated by our founding fathers. I am not ready to sell short the American Dream. I still believe in old-fashioned freedom, in self-government, in the inalienable rights of the individual and the limited powers of the state.

These are concepts at odds with communitarianism.

I reject communism – by whatever euphemism you employ.

You can read more about this philosophy and how it is playing havoc in education in this country in the upcoming October issue of Whistleblower magazine. In that issue, which will be mailed to subscribers in about two weeks, Charlotte Thomson Iserbyt, former senior policy adviser for the federal Office of Educational Research and Improvement in the U.S. Department of Education, explains how communitarian thought is dictating a national education policy. She is also author of "The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America," a book available in the WorldNetDaily store.

If this is the Third Way, I think I'll try to find another way. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Joseph Farah is editor and chief executive officer of WorldNetDaily.com and writes a daily column

33 posted on 12/01/2001 8:45:04 PM PST by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: OKCSubmariner
I think this response by LarryLied is a fitting response to this article

"Heck..as if we don't know. Bush is a NWO sell out. Bush and his family supported Lenin,Hitler, Pol Pot and Ted Kennedy (Barney Frank too but they don't like to talk about that).

The Bush family made Rush Limbaugh what he is today and the family rakes off 42.3% of the GROSS

Bush, Rush, Roger Ailes , Richard Melon Scaife, the Illumanti (who prefer that their names not be mentioned) and the Rockerfeller family met at their secret Manhatten lair on August 13th at 2:21 EDT and decided how they would divide up the world. Cheng Kai Kit, Ng Lap Seng waited the tables. Roger Tamaz was on drums. The centerpiece was, of course, the skull of John Lennon. Rush had his trusty aides dig up the skull earlier in the evening."

42 posted on 12/01/2001 8:53:07 PM PST by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: OKCSubmariner
I will not agree that President Bush sounds like or governs like Clinton. That is an insult to my intelligence.

I also will not pretend to know or understand all of the reasons things are being done as they are, for instance the OkC bombing. I do believe there were John Does involved, absolutely. But I don't know why Ashcroft would cover that up, IF he is. Neither does anyone else.

58 posted on 12/01/2001 9:18:25 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: OKCSubmariner
The republican village is so much better than the dems version, isn't it? As soon as I read this I thought the big govt. apologist would be out in full force. I wasn't disappointed. Statements throughout this thread are simply comical, like "fbi agents" are clintoon holdovers. Some of the more clueless actually "think" (if that's a trait that can be applied) that agents roll over with the new administration. Absolutely clueless. Blackbird.
97 posted on 12/02/2001 2:01:01 AM PST by BlackbirdSST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson