Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mercuria; Republic; It'salmosttolate; B4Ranch; b4its2late; flamefront
I called in on the Judicial Watch Radio program this morning and Larry Klayman stated that Terry McAuliffe is not named as a defendent.
Of course, McAuliffe might be deposed in this case.
5 posted on 12/01/2001 4:13:22 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Ragtime Cowgirl; abigail2; Brian Allen; Cicero; lawgirl; Howlin; Iwo Jima; bayourod; Black Jade...
fyi
6 posted on 12/01/2001 4:14:50 PM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ChaseR
I called in on the Judicial Watch Radio program this morning and Larry Klayman stated that Terry McAuliffe is not named as a defendent. Of course, McAuliffe might be deposed in this case.

Neat that you got a call through! Seems that McAuliffe SHOULD be named in the suit, but then, he really wasn't in the spotlight during that Loral fiasco. I hope this lawsuit starts getting the attention of the mainstream media (I know, fat chance.) I get furious everytime I think about it and I want to SLAP ol Bernie and see hitlery and her bumbling stooge behind bars.

23 posted on 12/01/2001 7:31:16 PM PST by Republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: ChaseR
I called in on the Judicial Watch Radio program this morning and Larry Klayman stated that Terry McAuliffe is not named as a defendent. Of course, McAuliffe might be deposed in this case.

McAuliffe better watch out! Remember what Hillary had done to Vince Foster when it was learned "they" were going to call on HIM about whitewater!!

366 posted on 12/19/2001 12:19:19 PM PST by mil-vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson