Posted on 12/01/2001 4:06:05 PM PST by ChaseR
As of 8/08/01, United States Senator, Hillary Rodham Clinton is a co-defendent in the Judicial Watch, Loral Shareholders case. This case was filed in federal court in Washington, D. C. This case formally accuses Senator Hillary Clinton, along with other defendents - of transfering technology to China. Co-defendents in this devastating case include, but are not limited to - William Jefferson Clinton, John Huang and Bernard Schwartz. This case is styled 01-CV-1715.
RON BROWN AUTOPSY PHOTO
Top of Ron Brown's scalp was torn away showing his skull with a round bullet hole in it!
Brown's face would be facing the top of picture.
Close up of round Bullet Hole.
Note the fleck of silver material at 11 o'clock.
A bullet makes such metallic tracer marks on impact!
You and Howlin are SO FUNNY with your definitions. At LEAST she can claim to know the legal definition of EVIDENCE since she works as a court reporter. What about you? Are you IN ANY WAY involved in forensic medicine or police investigations?
For those who don't know, VA Advogado is a PROVEN liar. He continues to claim that the photo he just posted is the result of an autopsy. But here is what EVERY expert involve in the case or familiar with the evidence says.
from: http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a2b498c045c.htm
Janoski, the photographer who took the photos he just posted - "He needed an autopsy plain and simple. It is a gross miscarriage of good forensic investigation that he did not get one. "
from http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1998/1/13/173306
"In Tribune-Review articles last month, Cogswell and Hause both went public about a small circular hole found in the very top of Brown's head. Both pathologists contend it looked like a gunshot wound. Last weekend, AFIP pathologist Air Force Maj. Thomas Parsons joined Cogswell and Hause in saying the wound was suspicious and an autopsy was needed. No autopsy was performed." Colonel Hause is an AFIP pathologist at Dover who saw the wound during the examination and is considered an EXPERT on gunshot wounds. Colonel Cogswell and Major Parsons are also pathologists at AFIP who have examined the photos. Cogswell was the AFIP representative at the crash site who looked for an innocent cause for the wound. He did not find one.
from http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a389a7d9b2971.htm
"Cogswell, AFIP's man at the crash scene, disputes the idea that any item found among the debris could explain the hole. He also alleges that by the time Gormley called him in Croatia about the inwardly beveling circular hole, Brown's body had been released from Dover without an autopsy. " Dr. Martin Fackler, former director of the Army's Wound Ballistics Laboratory in San Francisco is quoted as saying "They didn't do an autopsy. My God. It's astounding". Even Colonel Gormley, the AFIP "stooge" pathologist in charge of the examination and who refused requests for an autopsy, has now said he would have liked to have done an autopsy, "
from http://www.newsmax.com/articles/?a=1997/12/17/32921
Cyril Wecht - "One of the nation's most prominent forensic pathologists says there was "more than enough" evidence to suggest possible homicide in the death of Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, and an autopsy should have been conducted on his body. Allegheny County Coroner Cyril Wecht reached these conclusions after reviewing photographs of Brown's body, photo images of X-rays of Brown's head and body, and the report of the forensic pathologist for the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology who examined the corpse." "It's not even arguable in the field of medical legal investigations whether an autopsy should have been conducted on Brown," Wecht said. "I'll wager you anything that you can't find a forensic pathologist in America who will say Brown should not have been autopsied," Wecht continued.
VA Advogado is trying to CLAIM there was an autopsy to derail calls for one. That is a devious way of trying to STOP an investigation into this matter, which makes me suspicious that he doesn't really believe Brown was murdered. Do you VA Advogado?
You have obviously never been involved in a federal lawsuit, have you. They take years, especially when suing the government and the government stalls as much as they possibly can.
I have very good sources on this. However, I can not reveal them or BAC will know where I get my information that I use to refute him. I will say, ask BAC if he thinks that photo is authentic. I will go by whatever he says (in regards to its validity).
Yes I do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.