Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: He Rides A White Horse
I have to run now, but I just did a fast Google search to look for it and came across NYU's Sanger Project's response to the article here.

Notice the way they challenge the 'exterminate the negro population' quote. I think it could possibly go either way, but the reading of it (the lengthier quote they have) still seems to imply our understanding of it due to the use of phrases like "we do not want the word to get out..." and "occur..."

37 posted on 12/01/2001 1:27:11 PM PST by MitchellC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: MitchellC
In doing so, he misappropriated several Sanger quotations, highlighted seemingly inflammatory Sanger comments without providing any context

Sounds (they) pretty weak to me. I must be missing the "good context" in which the following phrases can be used:

In her 1922 book "Pivot of Civilization" she unabashedly called for the extirpation of "weeds .... overrunning the humnan garden"; for the segregation of "morons, misfits, and the maladjusted"; and for the sterilization of "genetically inferior races."

Maybe Hitler really wasn't such a bad guy either. We just took it all out of context.

There can be no doubt that Sanger would have been wildly enthusiastic over China's one-child policy, for her "Code to Stop Overproduction of Children," published in 1934, decreed that "no woman shall have a legal right to bear a child without a permit ... no permit shall be valid for more than one child." As for China's selective elimination of handicapped and abandoned babies, she would have been delighted that Beijing had heeded her decades-long call for exactly such eugenicist policies.

They do that now don't they. China? Red totalitarian China?

Even the inhuman operators of Chinese orphanages might have gotten an honorable mention, in order to underline the importance of their front-line work in eliminating what she called the "unfit" and "dysgenic."

Dysgenic..........gotta love that "Orweelian" Newspeak.........people with "bad" genes; who might they be? eugenicist......someone who advocates the propagation of "good genes...again, who might they be?

She often opined that "the most merciful thing that the large family does to one its infant members is to kill it,", and that "all our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class."

Maybe "Maggie" would be so kind as to keep a few around.........to serve her perhaps.

War with Germnay, combined with lurid tales of how the Nazis were putting her theories about "human weeds" and "genetically inferior races" into practice, panicked Sanger into changing her organization's name and rhetoric. "Birth control," with its undertone of coercion, became "family planning." The "unift" and the "dysgenic" became merely "the poor." The American Birth Control League became the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Right........words. To a liberal socialist.

40 posted on 12/01/2001 1:40:29 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: MitchellC
...and please know that I am not attacking you..merely addressing the point you brought up.
42 posted on 12/01/2001 1:41:35 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: MitchellC
You know, until I read the Sanger Project response to Mosher's article it never occured to me that the article might be slanted or distorted. I accepted it as pretty factual. Why not? Eugenics was quite the rage at the time. Why shouldn't a thoughtful person like Sanger believe in it? And I thought the post was a good one because it's always interesting to understand who the "real" person is, and because the subject is important today.

After reading the response I see Mosher's article is quite slanted and biased (deliberately so since he didn't reveal some very important and relevant things about his background) - although not necessarily entirely wrong.

But it's the Freepers responses that really trouble me. Hitler explicitly cited America's treatment of blacks and Indians as a model for his actions. He also credited Henry Ford for his anti-Semitism. I see no mention of this among Freepers. The South of that time was filled to the brim with people whose attitudes made Sanger's (even Mosher's view of them) look tame. No criticism from Freepers.

The logic seems to go like this: Sanger advocated birth control. Sanger was a racist and a eugenicist. Hitler was a racist and a eugenicist. Therefore birth control is evil.

65 posted on 12/01/2001 9:20:52 PM PST by liberallarry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson