To: Petronski
I don't really care for the genre, but even I know that Tolkien is literate and Potter is empty.
Potter is meant as eccentric entertainment. Tolkien was meant as literature. Comparing is sort of like saying that Monday Night Football is empty while Shakespeare is literate. Of course, but they do not have the same intentions.
6 posted on
11/30/2001 9:14:49 AM PST by
Arkinsaw
To: Arkinsaw
Potter is meant as eccentric entertainment. You area damn liar and you know it! Everybody knows that Potter was written for the sole purpose of luring children into the occult and making them tools of Satan!
To: Arkinsaw
I think LOTR could be even bigger that the Star Wars series. Actually I never could get too thrilled with Star Wars. LOTR looks more promising.
48 posted on
11/30/2001 10:31:01 AM PST by
PJ-Comix
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson