Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Adult Stem Cells Completely Cure Sickle Cell Patient
CBSNews.com ^ | 11/28/01 | Carol Marin

Posted on 11/30/2001 4:58:48 AM PST by anniegetyourgun

Pittsburgh, PA -- Stem cells are thought of as the Holy Grail of medicine. One young boy agrees with that. He made medical history because he's been cured of his life-threatening disease. The key to his cure did not come from a human embryo, where all the controversy is, but from something that is routinely toss in the garbage - an umbilical cord. Umbilical cords were always considered medical waste.

Not anymore.

That's why new parents like Pam Dorne and Stephen Ayers of suburban Chicago have decided to save their children's umbilical cord blood. Dorne gave birth last spring to a baby boy, Kyle.

After a baby is born, there is just a 15-minute window to retrieve the four to six ounces of blood in the umbilical cord. And in that blood are potentially lifesaving stem cells that can be saved for future use.

"This is really where, I think, so much of biomedicine is going to be going in the 21st century," says Dr. Andrew Yeager of the University of Pittsburgh.

For instance, when stem cells from umbilical cord blood are injected into a person's vein, they migrate to the bone marrow and can create what Dr. Yeager calls a blood factory, replacing diseased blood with healthy blood. According to the National Institutes of Health, stem cells may one day be able repair the body's tissue and muscle and cure everything from spinal cord injuries to Alzheimer's.

"It's not just pie-in-the-sky speculation," says Yeager. "There are studies that would suggest that other organ dysfunction - nerve damage, heart damage, brain-cell damage - might actually be fixed."

It has the potential to make paralyzed patients walk and make Alzheimer's sufferers remember.

That potential is what Dr. Yeager was counting on to cure a young patient named Keone Penn.

Keone suffers from a case of sickle cell, a painful genetic blood disease. He was diagnosed when he was 6 months old. He was 5 when his sickle cell caused a stroke.

"All I remember is I woke up and my mama was beside me and there was a basket beside me and a teddy bear," he says. "It was very scary, I mean, whew."

For six years, Keone and his mother, Leslie Penn, were constantly in and out of an Atlanta hospital to receive transfusions to stave off another potentially deadly stroke. By the time Keone was 11, the transfusions were becoming less effective and he had excruciating pain in his joints and lower back.

"The pain is usually so intense that even morphine, Demerol, those heavy-duty medicines don't really touch it," Leslie Penn says. "All you can really do is pray that he'll just go to sleep."

Keone says he's tough, but at 15, he looks much younger. Sickle cell stunted his growth - he's just 4 feet, 9 inches, tall - and restricted what he could do.

"I was impaired from doing a lot of things that normal kids do, like sports or anything or run," he says. "Couldn't play basketball. Because, you know, some people like roughhousing when they play basketball and they can knock you over and push you and that could really hurt me."

The odds were that Keone had, at best, only five years to live. So Yeager decided to take a chance on a new procedure. Never before had stem cells from umbilical cord blood been used to treat sickle cell.

"The goal here is that these stem cells, which are in a relatively high proportion in cord blood - higher than they would be in our own bone marrow and definitely higher than in our own circulating blood - could then be injected and would take hold and again, make more of themselves. And make a whole new blood factory."

Yeager told the family he wasn't sure the procedure would work.

"He just basically said, 'This is just a 50-50 chance and it's up to you all if you want to do it, I can't offer you any guarantees.'" recalls Leslie Penn.

Keone Penn remembers how his mother told him: "She came in the room looking very depressed. Pulled the chair up sat beside me in the bed and told me everything. And I almost started to cry. But she was very calm about it. She told me everything, said, 'You got-you may - have five years to live,' you know."

Ordinarily, patients with a severe case of sickle cell, like Keone's, would have had a bone-marrow transplant.That's because until recently bone marrow was the only source for stem cells.

But bone marrow transplants can be tricky because there must be a precise match between the person donating the bone marrow and the patient receiving it. In Keone's case, no match could be found.

Stem cells from umbilical cord blood don't need an exact match.

Dr. Yeager and his team found a match that was close enough in a cryogenic tank at the New York Public Blood Bank, which since 1992 has slowly been collecting donations of umbilical cord blood.

Over Christmas vacation of 1998, after intensive chemotherapy to destroy Keone's bad blood, he was injected with the stem cells.

After a few weeks, something extraordinary happened - the stem cells changed his entire blood system from type O to type B.

"That concept there is the one that really blows my mind," says Leslie Penn. "The thought that your whole blood type is changed. The umbilical cord cell's donor, he took on their blood type.

A year later, doctors declared that the sickle cells in Keone's body had disappeared. Today, he is considered cured.

It was umbilical cord stem cells that cured Keone, not stem cells from human embryos. While the use of embryonic stem cells has generated fierce controversy, umbilical cord stem cells have attracted little attention and no political debate. And now it seems, more and more new parents have decided to bank their hopes on the stem cells in their newborn's cord blood.

Moments after Pam Dorne gave birth to a baby Kyle, his cord blood was sealed, packed in dry ice, and given to a courier. Within hours, the package was on a plane bound for Tucson, Arizona, where the largest privately run cord blood bank in the country is located.

There, a child's umbilical-cord blood is stored in a cryogenic tank at a temperature of minus 400 degrees Fahrenheit.

Dr. David Harris, laboratory director of the Cord Blood Registry, says it takes only a small vial of cord blood to change a person's entire system.

So far, Cord Blood Registry has collected about 30,000 samples from families willing to pay a $1,300 flat fee and $95 a year to analyze and privately store their baby's cord blood. The company has taken in over $40 million so far, selling a kind of biological insurance.

"Part of the issue when people bank," says Harris, "it is because they have a family history or they work or live in a place where there is a potential for cancer. But part of it is for peace of mind."

According to the American Academy of Pediatrics, that peace of mind isn't worth the money. The academy says the chances a family will ever need to use its frozen cord blood are very small. What they say makes more sense is to donate cord blood to a public bank, the kind where Keone Penn got his stem cells.

That is something Pam Dorne, an obstetrician, says she understands in her professional life. But her own personal choice was a private bank, she says, for one reason.

"If the American Academy of Pediatrics could tell me that none of my children would ever have a problem," she says. "Or that if they had a problem, I would be guaranteed that there would be enough donors and somebody would match them, that would be perfectly reasonable. But I don't think anybody has that crystal ball."

What saved Keone Penn's life, Dr. Yeager says, is a public blood bank and the umbilical cord blood from an anonymous donor.

"If they wish to pay, that's absolutely fine." He says of patients. "But to look at a larger, greatest good for greatest number, I would contend that a volunteer donation to a public blood bank would make the most sense."

Meanwhile, Keone, a pioneer, is doing things he's never done before.

"I discovered the other day that I like playing basketball, " Keone says. "I never played basketball, 'cause I've always been disabled to play it and to have fun."

Keone, who one day hopes to become a chef, still has some major health problems as a result of infections that occur in most stem-cell transplants. Because of steroids and other medication, he has arthritis, walks with a limp and will need joint replacement in his hips and knee. But the good news is the sickle cell that was killing him is gone.

"I love stem cells," he says. "I mean they saved my life. If it weren't for them I wouldn't, you never know, I probably wouldn't be here today."

Keone doesn't know where the cord blood came from or who is the owner. He says he would like to know, just so he could say, "Thank You."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: 94Revolution
. Therefore they had to do something either on purpose, on accident or something to keep him from going into hemolytic shock. Meaning his normal bloodtype clumping together with the new bloodtype of B.

For one, his own bone marrow would have been killed off by chemotherapy. Before they give a transplant, they get just about every patient white blood cell killed off which means antibodies to the new cells aren't made and there won't be any hemolytic reaction. The new cells take over and they will make antibodies against the the old blood type if it tries to come back. In bone marrow transplants, it's the HLA match that matters more than blood group and Rh.

61 posted on 12/01/2001 7:21:54 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Nebullis
Some of these cells are fully differentiated, while some are pluripotent, which means they still have the ability to differentiate into certain types of cells.

For this reason, I think adult and cord blood stem cells are safer. I would not want anyone to experiment on me by putting totally undifferentiated stem cells in me for any reason. How do you guarantee they will differentiate? The most malignant cancers are undifferentiated cells that have spread all through your body and are growing out of control. At least by getting partially differentiated stem cells such as blood stem cells, they will likely grow into what you want them to be.

62 posted on 12/01/2001 7:28:39 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
God also thought it was OK to beat your slave, so long as you did not kill him. And you had to let your slave rest on the Sabbath.

I wouldn't want facts get in the way of a good argument.

63 posted on 12/01/2001 7:35:43 AM PST by Skywalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
ECS and cord cells are still normal, unlike malignant cells. They are differentiated and grown into the particular desired tissue before they are used.
64 posted on 12/01/2001 7:40:06 AM PST by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: FITZ; Nebullis
For this reason, I think adult and cord blood stem cells are safer. I would not want anyone to experiment on me by putting totally undifferentiated stem cells in me for any reason. How do you guarantee they will differentiate?

Remember what happened to MANY Parkinson patients who had fetal tissue implants? I believe the tissue grew in such an uncontrolled manner that it produced far too great a level of neurotransmitter and seriously screwed them up in an unremediable way.
65 posted on 12/01/2001 7:56:10 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Nebullis
Cytoskeletal genes or in the effects of the actual cytoskeleton on other gene expression? When encounter that paper again (I've boxed everything up after a successful defense and am moving on to the mechanisms of acetylcholine receptor assembly and neuron targeting), I'll send you the reference. I'll bookmark this page.
66 posted on 12/01/2001 7:59:57 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Yes, I read they completely halted some experiment because the "cure" was worse than the disease. I don't see any reason at all for fetal stem cells except from cord blood and placentas since the cells have to be differentiated at least somewhat before they are transplanted. A several weeks old fetus is mostly differentiated cells anyhow and has very few stem cells because of it's tiny size, a larger amount could be obtained from a placenta that would be discarded or from an adult.
67 posted on 12/01/2001 8:06:19 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
God never approved of slavery - slavery comes from the heart of man. It's not wise to blame God for man's sin. But then, your understanding of same is nothing a good class in hermeneutics wouldn't clear up.
68 posted on 12/01/2001 8:06:57 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Just before our daughter was born, we were approached about "donating" her cord blood. The two of us, being engineers, saw the technological aspect of this and thought "Cool. That blood is rich is stem cells. It would be nice to see it used in research or something. It could really help someone." But the "donation" wasn't that at all. They were trying to sell us on this private blood bank. We passed and as a result, those stem cells were tossed.

Don't get me wrong. I don't mind the hospital being "greedy" and trying to make a buck. I'm all for good ol' Capitalism. But, it would have been nice to see a "plan B" where the resource wasn't wasted. We would have happily donated the material for research such as what helped this boy. But the quest for short-term profit eliminated that. In the long run, the medical industry stands to make a small fortune off of this boy now that he may live to a ripe old age. Multiply this by thousands of similar patients and it's obvious that the medical industry would make much more that they would selling blood bank subscriptions. It's just too bad that that $15/year is more appealing to them than the thousands they'll make rendering services to this boy over his now extended lifetime.

69 posted on 12/01/2001 8:20:53 AM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71; Nebullis
I don't think the problem here is with surface proteins, but rather with gene switches in the DNA. Already differentiated cells type nuclei are unable to bring about the complete formation of an organism after insertion into a zygote, at this point. What I think science needs to find is a way to play with the gene switches.

One of the reasons a particular cell is a particular cell is because its progenitors have responded to a series of factors that have pushed its differentiation in one direction rather than another. Some of these factors act through surface receptors such as the heterotrimeric G proteins. Some diffuse in. Some apparently work directly through a mechanical connection between cell-surface receptors and the gene in question. These means are the switches that drive gene expression. DNA all on its own is just a passive strip of protein recipes and doesn't control anything. It responds to pre-existing cellular conditions. Finding ways to manipulate certain conditions can control gene expression. Finding ways to control gene expression can change the conditions and, hopefully, alter the identity of the cell. Perhaps a particular disease phenotype is due to a mutation that affects the behavior of a certain splice variant which happens to be the developmental default isoform. Instead of trying to do gene therapy and replace the entire gene, it may be possible to preferentially induce expression of one of the other splice variants that could work just as well and so partially or completely ameliorate the disease phenotype. Of course, if the error was far down within a developmental chain such that D depended on C, and C on B, and B was screwed up by something happening in A, then by the time you get to the point of altered D or non-existing D, it may be too late to fix. However, there could be certain embryonically-lethal or perinatally lethal mutations that could be sidestepped by this approach at an early enough point of intervention. That would be really cool. Something like this is a standard technique anyway with a rescue transgene (this is a way of finding out just what role a particular gene does or doesn't have in development). In Drosophila you can have a lethal mutation for a protein that is absolutely critical for development. There may be a larva which simply will die without pupating. However, if you transfect the egg with a transgene with an inducible promoter for that gene, you can turn it on and get the larva over the developmental hump, after which it may be fine. Unfortunately, the way things have been going with humans, even if it were possible to avoid such a developmental blind end, genetic tests that revealed the condition early enough on would just be used to counsel the mother to abort the kid, "for his own good".
70 posted on 12/01/2001 8:31:00 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
But the "donation" wasn't that at all. They were trying to sell us on this private blood bank.

That was so the cord blood would be available to your daughter should she ever need it. It wasn't short-term profit, greed, or anything like that. The cost was to pay for the time, expertise, and equipment necessary to maintain it in viable condition. Somebody has to pay for it. From what you say, it doesn't sound as though you, like so many, assume that the costs of anything having to do with keeping one alive should be paid for by someone else.

Given the HUGE volume of cord blood available for research, researchers have all they need. As the benefits are established, the necessity of saving more of it will grow. At the present, though, the main call for saving cord blood has been from parents having heard of the possibilites and wishing to safeguard their child in the future by saving the cord blood now in case it can be used to cure all sorts of maladies.
71 posted on 12/01/2001 8:44:24 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
I agree and understand where the "theory" is. However, practically speaking, its such a complicated process to find out how even one gene gets switched on, and from there to follow the "dominos" back to the original switch is almost too much to fathom. Maybe science will figure it out, maybe it won't, but the way I see it is that we at least need to try. Maybe someday we can counsel that mother to get genetic therapy for the baby rather than having to abort.

One of the glaring problems I see here, however, is that, how does science ethically experiment with genetic manipulations in developing humans? You cannot get it right the first time around, and imagine the number of misdevelopments and miscarriges that could result.

Catch 22

72 posted on 12/01/2001 8:44:47 AM PST by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Cytoskeletal genes or in the effects of the actual cytoskeleton on other gene expression?

Cytoskeletal genes. Actins, in particular. Which, as you know, don't function in isolation. In their effects on cell adhesion at one end and upregulated expression of nuclear genes on the other, invasive and metastatic potential are changed.

Anyway, if you're anything like me, that stuff will still be boxed up ten years later and the current literature sustains the interest.

73 posted on 12/01/2001 8:46:35 AM PST by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Dumb_Ox
This story did air on 60 Minutes II this week. In fact, the article posted here is almost an exact transcript.

The young man, and his Mom, were so neat. After the infusion of the blood cells his blood type changed to the type of the donor cells and all vestages of the sickle cell are gone. He is still doing battle with the results of prior damage caused by the sickle cell anemia and from some immunosuppressor (sp) therapy that was required.

The whole story centered around the collection and use, current and future, of cord blood. The collected specimens are saved cryogenically for the future use of the "new born".

There is lots of room for R and D in this area and the hope is HUGE.

74 posted on 12/01/2001 9:12:27 AM PST by codder too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
I'm aware of the alleged benefits of banking the cord blood. We turned them down because the maladies listed as "perhaps treatable some day" are excedingly rare. It was a simple cost/benefit analysis that drove our decision. But as I said, by being narrowly focused on short term profit, they lost the opportunity to have the material donated. And hearing the same medical community now complain that Bush is depriving them of stem cells for research makes their behavior all the more puzzling.
75 posted on 12/01/2001 9:20:34 AM PST by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Nebullis
The doctor was shown extracting the blood from the cord. This must be done within literally seconds after the baby is delivered. The cord is clamped and the sample withdrawn. The blood is that which is contained in the cord between the baby and the placenta. Only a few ccs are available and only a few are needed. Looked like they were using a 30cc syringe with a large guage needle that would allow the cells to be collected without damage.

In the case of sickle cell, the patients blood supply was irradiated, I believe they said, prior to the introduction of the new cells.

The technology is amazing.

76 posted on 12/01/2001 9:22:25 AM PST by codder too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: codder too
What is shown in television recreations is usually a little different from the real story. Reality is that, even in cord blood, actual stem cells are very rare. The point is to harvest as much blood as possible. A good harvest, including the placenta, is about 50 cc.
77 posted on 12/01/2001 9:35:42 AM PST by Nebullis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
BTW, at the risk of pointing out the obvious, #38 is the answer to your question of when life begins. Unless, of course, you want to say that the joining of egg and sperm of humans does not result in human life. What then? Fish life? Dog life? Whale life?
78 posted on 12/01/2001 10:09:04 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: realpatriot71
One of the glaring problems I see here, however, is that, how does science ethically experiment with genetic manipulations in developing humans? You cannot get it right the first time around, and imagine the number of misdevelopments and miscarriges that could result.

That's what animal experimentation is for (sung to that tune from the 80's). The sequences of many genes are highly conserved between various species and their proteins behave the same way as in humans. For example, human L1 transfected into Drosophila S2 cells behaves in the same way as Drosophila neuroglian. It causes cell-cell adhesion and recruits Drosophila ankyrin specifically to sites of cell-cell contact. Research such as this at least provides insight into what's happening in human development.
79 posted on 12/01/2001 10:59:04 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
a. But as I said, by being narrowly focused on short term profit, they lost the opportunity to have the material donated.
b. And hearing the same medical community now complain that Bush is depriving them of stem cells for research makes their behavior all the more puzzling.

a. Researchers into cord blood stem cells have more than enough to experiment with. Virtually all of them have their labs in universities with hospitals with relatively easy access to cord blood.
b. They aren't complaining about the quantity of any particular stem cell line because once you have it you can grow up as many individual cells as you want. They're complaining because they don't want to be restricted to the number of different lines that are available today. They want as many different lines as they can possibly get from every point in development. Simply having a greater quantity of cord blood won't make any difference.
80 posted on 12/01/2001 11:08:21 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson