Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC lawyers recommend giving Dems break on soft-money rules to make up for slow fund raising after
AP | 11/28/01 | Sharon Theimer

Posted on 11/28/2001 1:17:36 PM PST by Native American Female Vet

FEC lawyers recommend giving Dems break on soft-money rules to make up for slow fund raising after attacks

By Sharon Theimer, Associated Press, 11/28/2001 17:03

WASHINGTON (AP) Democrats, arguing their finances have been hit hard by slow fund raising after the terrorist attacks, are getting a sympathetic ear from the Federal Election Commission's lawyers.

FEC attorneys are recommending that the commission grant the Democratic National Committee's request for a break on a ''soft money'' spending rule.

The DNC says it canceled or postponed at least eight fund-raisers in the three weeks after the attacks, depriving it of an anticipated $1.65 million.

Because of that, the DNC wants the commission to extend the amount of time it and other fund-raising committees have to cover operating expenses using soft-money campaign contributions.

The commission plans to consider the request and the FEC lawyers' recommendation Thursday.

Soft money contributions can be made in unlimited amounts, but there are limits on how party committees such as the DNC and its Republican counterpart can spend them.

The Republican National Committee has not commented to the FEC on the Democrats' request. Asked whether the GOP would take advantage of an extension, spokesman Trent Duffy said no decision had been made.

While both major parties are prolific soft-money raisers, the Democrats tend to rely more heavily on it, while the GOP typically has a ''hard-money'' advantage.

When it comes to operating expenses, party committees are allowed to first cover the cost using hard money, donations that are limited in size but can be spent by recipients in any way.

They can then reimburse themselves for 40 percent of those expenses using soft money.

Party committees now have 60 days to make the reimbursement. The DNC wants the FEC to extend the time limit to 120 days.

That would give it until March 1 to use soft money for expenses incurred through the end of this year. The DNC says most of the contributions it would have taken in at the fund-raisers would have been soft money.

The commission's lawyers say that rather than temporarily waiving the rule, the FEC should simply stop enforcing it for transfers until March 1. Campaign-finance watchdog groups including Common Cause, Democracy 21 and the Center for Responsive Politics oppose the DNC's request.

The groups feel soft money allows special interests to wield undue political influence and should be banned rather than given what they view as another loophole.

The FEC is ''talking about not enforcing a lawfully enacted rule they made, and publicly announcing that they will not enforce that rule, and that is wrong,'' said Larry Noble, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics and former general counsel for the commission.

Noble said the DNC has failed to show it is facing a funding emergency due to the terrorist attacks.

DNC attorney Joseph Sandler said the commission has used discretion in enforcing its rules before. He said the DNC has proved hardship and is seeking relief through a request that deals only with the timing of transfers between party accounts, not the overall amount of soft money that a party can spend.

On the Net:

Federal Election Commission: http://www.fec.gov/

Democratic National Committee:

http://www.democrats.org/

Republican National Committee: http://www.rnc.org/


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last
To: Angelwood
bttt
81 posted on 11/28/2001 6:58:36 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: D Joyce
bump
82 posted on 11/28/2001 7:08:14 PM PST by Soul Citizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #83 Removed by Moderator

To: Howlin
Well, this is a hellofa thing to wake up to!

Tell them to turn to their ardant supporters, the trial lawyers, the education unions and the Hollywood celebrities, like Barbra Streisand et al.

84 posted on 11/28/2001 11:27:53 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Oh waaaa boo hoo! Donations are down all over the place and the dems want to use this as a way to get ahead. The Brady Bunch has had declining donations all year and suddenly it's because of the terrorist attacks. The lefties are losing ground and can't admit it!
85 posted on 11/29/2001 4:52:55 AM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
The RNC is so out of touch. They should be making a big public issue of this.

Wouldn't be the first time, Rodney, and I'm damn sure it won't be the last. The RNC has an uncanny ability to make big DNC-related news disappear.

86 posted on 11/29/2001 5:40:46 AM PST by LoneGOPinCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dale 1
I think their inability to raise money just now has more to do with a backlash to klinton and the gore debacle.

Let's see if they'll ask those scam artists at the Red Cross for some dough.

87 posted on 11/29/2001 6:44:59 AM PST by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
No Problem - How about we make the RNC write the poor DNC guys a check for their lost revenue. Makes sense to me.

Why doesn't the DNC get with Hilliary and have a yard sale up there in Chapaqua. They could sell all the stuff she stole outa the white house. Or the DNC could let Hilliary invest some of their cash in CATTLE futures.

88 posted on 11/29/2001 6:53:56 AM PST by sandydipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Let's get rid of the FEC and all election laws. Their only purpose is to protect the 'craps.
89 posted on 11/29/2001 8:07:42 AM PST by FloridaGeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Native American Female Vet
It was just pointed out to me (THANKS) that it was the FCC, not the FEC, who suspended the equal time requirement last election.

But perhaps that is why the FEC turned down the DNC request.

90 posted on 11/30/2001 7:49:20 PM PST by BeAChooser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
CLICK on Janet Reno's MiniMe:


[Mary Jo] White Put Politics Before Prosecution ~ Kelly Patricia O’ Meara - Insight Magazine

.

91 posted on 12/06/2001 5:51:19 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson