Posted on 11/28/2001 1:17:36 PM PST by Native American Female Vet
FEC lawyers recommend giving Dems break on soft-money rules to make up for slow fund raising after attacks
By Sharon Theimer, Associated Press, 11/28/2001 17:03
WASHINGTON (AP) Democrats, arguing their finances have been hit hard by slow fund raising after the terrorist attacks, are getting a sympathetic ear from the Federal Election Commission's lawyers.
FEC attorneys are recommending that the commission grant the Democratic National Committee's request for a break on a ''soft money'' spending rule.
The DNC says it canceled or postponed at least eight fund-raisers in the three weeks after the attacks, depriving it of an anticipated $1.65 million.
Because of that, the DNC wants the commission to extend the amount of time it and other fund-raising committees have to cover operating expenses using soft-money campaign contributions.
The commission plans to consider the request and the FEC lawyers' recommendation Thursday.
Soft money contributions can be made in unlimited amounts, but there are limits on how party committees such as the DNC and its Republican counterpart can spend them.
The Republican National Committee has not commented to the FEC on the Democrats' request. Asked whether the GOP would take advantage of an extension, spokesman Trent Duffy said no decision had been made.
While both major parties are prolific soft-money raisers, the Democrats tend to rely more heavily on it, while the GOP typically has a ''hard-money'' advantage.
When it comes to operating expenses, party committees are allowed to first cover the cost using hard money, donations that are limited in size but can be spent by recipients in any way.
They can then reimburse themselves for 40 percent of those expenses using soft money.
Party committees now have 60 days to make the reimbursement. The DNC wants the FEC to extend the time limit to 120 days.
That would give it until March 1 to use soft money for expenses incurred through the end of this year. The DNC says most of the contributions it would have taken in at the fund-raisers would have been soft money.
The commission's lawyers say that rather than temporarily waiving the rule, the FEC should simply stop enforcing it for transfers until March 1. Campaign-finance watchdog groups including Common Cause, Democracy 21 and the Center for Responsive Politics oppose the DNC's request.
The groups feel soft money allows special interests to wield undue political influence and should be banned rather than given what they view as another loophole.
The FEC is ''talking about not enforcing a lawfully enacted rule they made, and publicly announcing that they will not enforce that rule, and that is wrong,'' said Larry Noble, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics and former general counsel for the commission.
Noble said the DNC has failed to show it is facing a funding emergency due to the terrorist attacks.
DNC attorney Joseph Sandler said the commission has used discretion in enforcing its rules before. He said the DNC has proved hardship and is seeking relief through a request that deals only with the timing of transfers between party accounts, not the overall amount of soft money that a party can spend.
On the Net:
Federal Election Commission: http://www.fec.gov/
Democratic National Committee:
http://www.democrats.org/
Republican National Committee: http://www.rnc.org/
WHAT??????
Yet Clinton appointed 4? So, who is number 4? A member of the Socialist Worker's Party? ; )
Holy cow! If they aren't pure Marxists! Fire this guy, and FAST!
Here's the proper answer, FEC:
Who the hell do these people think they are??? You know what? I've had a rough time 'cause of the ECONOMY, Democrats...HOW ABOUT KEEPING A LITTLE LESS OF MY HARD EARNED INCOME??
This same LAME party (one I used to support!) wants MORE time to get MORE money, but their Congressional leadership (Dash-hole, et al) are DRAGGING THEIR FEET when it comes to TAX RELIEF FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!
I am SO glad to be a
Recovering Democrat.
And they can't win an election without vote fraud. They should be offered no help from special interest "soft money", because they themselves demanded these laws. They should get the picture that they are a dying party and go lay down till it's over instead of trying more tricks and asking for more breaks.
Or maybe not. If he does't go for this one, we'll soon see whose side he's on. And who is paying the bills now.
Precisely.
That would appear to be the case. However Bush has sandbagged the left over and over (Adarand is the latest). I'm no expert but I have no doubt there are some freeper spooks around who might say the best thing to do is leave the people you know are rotten in place. For a while.
Texans play to win, they are not much concerned with pleasing the crowd or racking up points. When it is all over, they want all the chips.
They have not commented to you or me or given the press bait to bash the GOP for being anti working people. But they have been doing things. Such as:
PoliticalMoneyLine has recently acquired Department Of Labor figures ranking all of the top labor organizations currently filing. The report is a detailed look at the yearly figures for each union's overall financial status. Click here to see rankings. Go here to see Labor Unions' political spending activity (including 527 activity). Take a look at an example of DOL's newly increased effort at getting additional information from Labor filers. Specifically, see the bottom of the page of this pfd filing from the Plumbers & Pipefitters
For those who have not followed the union corruption and money trail under Clinton, this is, let us hope, manna from heaven. No Democrat would ever allow this information, sparse may it be, be made public.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.