Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul: Can Freedom be Exchanged for Security?
Ron Paul ^ | 26 November 2001 | Hon. Ron Paul, M.D.

Posted on 11/27/2001 6:58:59 AM PST by Zviadist

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-189 last
To: Demidog
And you know that ... how?
181 posted on 11/29/2001 8:04:50 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: annalex
Because publically Bush said on more than one ocassion that any demands for evidence were not acceptable. Have you been paying attention? There is no credible evidence in the public domain that bin Laden is actually responsible.

Afghanistan did say they would turn over bin Laden if the U.S. would show them the evidence. We refused. We said that such a demand was yet more proof that they were uncooperative.

182 posted on 11/29/2001 9:36:12 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Blair released a white paper that detailed the evidence. The Taliban dismissed it offhand. That is not cooperative.
183 posted on 11/29/2001 9:42:17 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: annalex
They are not required to cooperate. However, I have never heard of such a white paper. And why is the British government responsible for that presentation? Where is that white paper?
184 posted on 11/29/2001 10:06:02 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
The white paper was news a week or two after 9/11. I don't know why Blair was presenting it and not Bush.

This is what has been released to the public. It is not, as they admit, a prosecutorial case. That should hve provided a basis for the Taliban to cooperate further, and they didn't.

Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities

This document (updated on 14.11.01) does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Usama bin Laden in a court of law. Intelligence often cannot be used evidentially, due both to the strict rules of admissibility and to the need to protect the safety of sources. But on the basis of all the information available HMG is confident of its conclusions as expressed in this document.

INTRODUCTION

1. The clear conclusions reached by the government are:

Entire document
185 posted on 11/29/2001 10:46:04 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: unixfox
I do live in a cave. How did you know? Are you an FBI employee? Did you peek at my files?
186 posted on 11/30/2001 11:07:42 AM PST by Barry Goldwater
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

Comment #187 Removed by Moderator

Comment #188 Removed by Moderator

To: boston_liberty
Probably not.
189 posted on 12/03/2001 9:48:44 AM PST by scottiewottie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-189 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson