Posted on 11/27/2001 12:35:10 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:02:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
Our society allows an adult to kill another human being without fear of punishment or stigma.
The criminal is paid for her cruelty with an education, career counseling, plus the assurance, "It's not your fault."
We claim to abhor violence and love children. But when babies are slaughtered by their own mothers' hands, the justice system does back flips to forgive ferocious felons.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
This is what's important to the drug warriors. Even if it means that child murderers walk.
The man has been sentenced to three years in prison, a sentence that drew much discussion. Something fundamental must be missing from a person who could commit such an act.
But, at last, people are waking up to animal cruelty. The judge treated the dog-hurling incident with the seriousness it deserved.
I wonder what sentence the judge would have imposed if it had been a pet rat instead of a dog?
Indeed, most of these "parents" who kill their kids were druggies. However, what you don't see in this article is the sad fact that the mom's new boyfriend who is a druggie is the most usual one to kill the kid. When a mom kills kids shortly after childbirth, often it is associated with a mental illness, often associated with post partum depression (Ask your wife about it).
Druggies, on the other hand, simply chose to take drugs, and I have little sympathy when they shake a kid or beat the shit out of a kid who is crying and gets on their nerves (I've treated half a dozen of such kids, two died of severe brain damage)
Wake up, Andrea Peyser. If killing babies one second out of the birth control is a "heinous crime" why is killing babies one second away from natural birth a "woman's cherished constitutional right"?
Probably less. I don't think we value rats as high as babies.
Neither will this one. Hope you enjoy it.
How scientific. Most of the dead babies in this country occur via the members of your profession. Perhaps we should start jailing all doctors. I wouldn't mind much if you went to jail.
How do you back up such a claim? The high profile cases, Drexler, Grossberg, Smith, the recent Texas case that claims post-partum depression as a defense... none of these are drug related. Oh yeah... then there's Marie Noe. Remember her? She's the Philadelphia Woman convicted of murdering eight of her nine babies over eight years (the ninth died "mysteriously"). She got house arrest and then probation. I think she should have gotten the pipe.
I don't have a dog in the fight against drugs, but I have an 18 month old son. Infanticide is treated as a personality disorder or illness of the mother. It doesn't even get included in national murder statistics. Let's not take it even further out into psychobabble land by claiming it's simply a substance abuse problem.
Statistics. I am using statistics from CASA, but there are plenty of other web sites that have statistics on social problems.
Or just ask you local pastor, or any ER nurse.
seventy percent of children who are abused are abused by a substance abusing adult. Most are not moms with post partum depression, or the cases you read about in the newspapers.
Children with parents who use drugs and heavy alcohol are four times as likely to be abused. Twenty thousand kids are taken from mom because they are obvious addicts. A half a million kids (at least: I believe the actual number is higher) are raised by grandparents, aunts or other relatives because their parents can't do it. I see many kids taken from druggie parents by family pressure but sometimes welfare forceably takes the kids and places them with family. Half a million kids are up for adoption at any one time.
Of course this has nothing to do with your good family. You aren't really your brother's keeper.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.