Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rhetorical Questions to myself and other Catholic Apologists here

Posted on 11/26/2001 2:49:05 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM

Rhetorical Questions to myself and other Catholic Apologists here:

After reading numerous threads of what I term the "Freeper Wars," I'm going to state an assumption (which might well be terribly wrong) then ask a few rhetorical questions.

If a "Freeper Wars" thread (you know the type, starts out as a thread of interest to Catholic freepers, then turns into the standard anti-Catholic posts with attempts to defend the faith by the regular Catholic Apologists here) is several days old and several hundred posts long, the "undecided" will be few.

Your apologetics are not intended to convert those whose hearts and minds are closed (although, by the Grace of God it does indeed happen). They are intended to illuminate the intellect and soul of those still open to Truth, and still willing to learn. I doubt that many of those make it to that point in threads here, i.e., when threads are 200 to 300 posts or longer, several days old, etc.

Therefore, your time is being spent only on those you are directly responding to, when they do their own self search.

Is that an effective use of your time and talent? Or would prayer, not words, be more effective at this point? Are we trying to win souls, or points of debate?

Just a few thoughts I ask myself constantly on these types of threads, i.e., where is my time better spent, reading to my kids and spending time with my spouse, or trying to convert those late on a thread whose minds and hearts are hardened? Are there enough lurkers late in a thread to make it worth the amount of time and intense effort to defend the faith that these threads usually entail late in their usual progression?


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-240 next last
To: logos
nope
101 posted on 11/26/2001 10:06:39 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
People who would crash a family picnic in a public park (a picnic to which they were not invited but nevertheless knew about) are not acting in a spirit of Christian charity.
102 posted on 11/26/2001 11:32:20 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
I am so glad to see that point of order coming from a brother who is Protestant.
103 posted on 11/26/2001 11:40:54 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
I am so glad to see that point of order coming from a brother who is Protestant.

Thank you, but may I suggest slightly different wording for your post?

I am so glad to see that point of order coming from a Brother who is protestant.

I'd like to keep the focus where it belongs, Brother!

;)

Shalom.

104 posted on 11/26/2001 11:47:01 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: logos
I'm not so sure that we frail human creatures are always so good at identifying which is true and which is false.

One of those listed has, as a central belief, the teaching that "As man now is, God once was. As God now is, man shall become." I think this qualifies as a false gospel. And I feel fully qualified to call it such. More examples could be cited.

I have read much CS Lewis, but not recently, and I cannot claim to be a Lewis scholar. He is a superb apologist for the Christian faith, in my opinion. (He even defended the idea of purgatory.) I am currently re reading the fiction of JRR Tolkien, very close friend of Lewis, and instrumental in bringing Lewis to Christ. Tolkien was a robust Catholic.

105 posted on 11/26/2001 12:55:06 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
Oh, I agree that we can identify those "gospels" which are egregiously false; it's the always able to do so part which bothers me. :^)

Please don't overlook Francis Schaeffer, either. He deals more directly with the role of Christianity in a post-modern world than does Lewis, and is just as easy a read. I would recommend his Trilogy for starters.

106 posted on 11/26/2001 3:14:10 PM PST by logos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
"But this is the same Paul that says there is neither male nor female in Christ."

Yes, and context is everything, isn't it. That statement refers to our salvation in Christ, not to leadership in the church. :)

107 posted on 11/26/2001 3:49:37 PM PST by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: packrat01
How many repent of catholicism

REPENT of Catholicism? Your bile is leaking.

108 posted on 11/26/2001 3:58:49 PM PST by Petronski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: logos
I will look him up as soon as I finish my current Tolkien tome. Thank you.
109 posted on 11/26/2001 4:02:50 PM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
I'll make it easy for you. :) The first link is to an excerpt of his writing, the second is to a site which lists all his work. Enjoy.

The Mark of a Christian

The Shelter

110 posted on 11/26/2001 4:19:51 PM PST by logos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Why is it then, that those who have faith in, and believe in one, true God, but do not follow any of the tenets of established religions, get flamed so much on FreeRepublic?

Fear?

I fit into this category. I was raised Catholic, but have drifted away from any social religion. To me religion is personal.

Because of this I have never been flamed. Arguing with others about religion seems useless. The purpose of religion should be to lead a more spiritual life, not to convince others to, IMHO.

About the only thing I like to do to others who claim to KNOW the truth about God is to remind them that they are but one of billions of organisms on one planet out of trillions in a vast universe, and that they really don't know anything at all. A real, modern-day flat earth society...

FReegards...

111 posted on 11/26/2001 4:30:47 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
I just finished re-reading The Mark of a Christian to refresh my memory. I think it is particularly applicable to this very thread. See if you don't think so, too.

Peace.

112 posted on 11/26/2001 5:04:32 PM PST by logos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: proud2bRC
Found this on the EWTN Q&A section:

Only Jesus Saves
Question from Steve on 11-19-2001:

I was in a Catholic chatroom posting bible quotes in a debate with a "Born Again" type proponent, and several Catholics in the room told me to stop quoting the bible like a Protestant and ignore those who come into the room challenging the Catholic faith. They told me Jesus alone saves and I should leave it to him. I was very disppointed and did not have any good repsonse. They also told me when Mormans and Jehovah's witnesses come to my door, I should ignore them too because my attempts to convert them is the job of Jesus and not me.

Answer by Catholic Answers on 11-19-2001:

Keep speaking the truth in love. Christ uses us, if we are willing, to introduce others to himself. The Catechism of the Catholic Church says, "Lay people also fulfill their prophetic mission by evangelization, 'that is, the proclamation of Christ by word and the testimony of life.' For lay people, 'this evangelization . . . acquires a specific property and peculiar efficacy because it is accomplished in the ordinary circumstances of the world.'This witness of life, however, is not the sole element in the apostolate; the true apostle is on the lookout for occasions of announcing Christ by word, either to unbelievers . . . or to the faithful" (§905).

Jan Wakelin Catholic Answers


113 posted on 11/27/2001 4:08:20 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: logos
I bookmarked both. Thank you again.

In His Peace,

Dr. Brian Kopp

114 posted on 11/27/2001 5:32:17 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
Very good advice. Thanks for finding this one.
115 posted on 11/27/2001 5:34:22 AM PST by Brian Kopp DPM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: joathome
Yes, and context is everything, isn't it. That statement refers to our salvation in Christ, not to leadership in the church. :)

That was precisely my point. You interpret this passage to apply only to salvation. I interpret this passage to say that the rules do not apply differently to men or to women. We both know it doesn't apply to whether men can have babies or women can grow beards. We have to interpret what we read. This doesn't make Holy Scripture any less the enerrent Word of G-d. It's just that our imperfection allows us to misinterpret what G-d has said.

When we reconcile the two - the fact that in Christ there is neither male nor female but that Paul does not allow a woman to be in authority over a man, you have chosen to limit the context of the first. I chose to note that the 2 Timothy passage is based on Paul's preference "I do not allow" rather than a law of G-d. Given the number of women Paul greets as leaders of their own churches, and the woman who taught Apollos the Gospel, I don't accept that Paul insisted that women can not be leaders. We have each chosen our own way of reconciling the two passages, each chosen our own way to look at the context. That means we should be able to discuss the issue as reasonable adults who recognize our basic similarity rather than fight about our differences.

My mind is not closed on the issue. And I don't respect the RC church any less for its position.

Shalom.

116 posted on 11/27/2001 5:49:25 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: copycat
About the only thing I like to do to others who claim to KNOW the truth about God is to remind them that they are but one of billions of organisms on one planet out of trillions in a vast universe, and that they really don't know anything at all.

How do you know this? And is this assertion of yours absolutely true?

117 posted on 11/27/2001 5:49:44 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
Do you believe that men are the head of the home? Why would God place a woman head over the spiritual family? That is not reconcilable in light of all the many passages dealing with women in the church and family.
118 posted on 11/27/2001 7:20:47 AM PST by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
Are you familiar with the Council on Biblical Manhood and Womahood? www.cbmw.org At one time it used to have some excellent articles on the subject.

I have to say that I find female leadership in the church totally impossible to reconcile with the totality of scripture. There is such a beauty in the picture of biblical man and womanhood that's just destroyed when you put women in charge.

You know, I recently watched a two part series on Victoria and Albert. (I highly recommend it, by the way.) Any Christian holding to traditional biblical views of gender roles would have immediately recognized the problem of a man having his wife for his queen. *G*

Ditto for "pastor".

God bless.

119 posted on 11/27/2001 7:32:47 AM PST by joathome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: joathome
Do you believe that men are the head of the home? Why would God place a woman head over the spiritual family? That is not reconcilable in light of all the many passages dealing with women in the church and family.

I do, exactly as Christ is the head of the church. "The Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve and to give His life as a ransome for many."

My wife and I share the decisions in the home. In areas where I have more knowledge, I make the decisions, although I always run those decisions by her before making them so she will always know what is going on. In areas where she has more knowledge, I would be a fool to assume that responsibility. She makes those decisions and I trust her. Of course, she also runs them by me. What kind of fool would refuse a gift given to him by G-d such as a wife who makes excellent financial decisions?

So what do I mean by head? It is my responsibility to give my life for the family. Thankfully the requirement has only been to lay down my wants and desires for the good of my wife and children. But if it ever required giving up my physical life - that is still the requirement.

So, let's relate this practically to a church. I'll speak to a protestant church, but it will apply somewhat to a Catholic church as well. I have been in a protestant church where the person most gifted musically was a woman. She picked out the music, rehearsed the choir, made all the sound arrangements, arranged music, hired musicians, etc., etc. In fact, when Jonathan Settel came one Sunday as a guest he told me he assumed she was the Worship Leader. But, of course, she was not. A man had to stand at the microphone because women were not allowed to be leaders. I call this stupid, but in a nice way. She had the gift, and G-d had given her and her gift to the congregation. As long as the Pastor held the final authority (as he did with anyone, male or female) why should the church create a false veneer (sp?) of male leadership? In the same way, I have known many male pastors who were not up to the task, their wives did most of the work. Why hold to the veneer of male leadership. The woman was a gift from G-d. Why not allow the gift to be used?

That said, I know that a Catholic Priest is not a protestant pastor. Protestant pastors are primarily business administrators. Catholic's see the role of Priest as different and I will not argue the validity of the Priesthood. It makes sense that the Catholics, seeing the Priest as a representative of Jesus in the congregation, would require the Priest be male. But if the best person to run the associated school is a woman, let her be in leadership over the school, IMO.

Shalom.

120 posted on 11/27/2001 7:39:03 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 221-240 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson