Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mexicans Told Immigration Reform Is Dead for Now Because of Terrorism Concerns
AP ^ | 11/20 07:00 pm EDT | George Gedda

Posted on 11/20/2001 4:17:34 PM PST by flamefront



Published: Nov 20, 2001

WASHINGTON (AP) - A comprehensive immigration agreement between Mexico and the United States will have to be deferred because of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, administration officials said Tuesday.

The officials, asking not to be identified, said they notified a visiting Mexican delegation that security concerns will have to take a higher priority in cross-border relations.

They said the Mexicans understood and accepted the U.S. decision.

Mexican President Vicente Fox has been a harsh critic of the current system, in which Mexican migrants who come to the United States are unable to escape their illegal status.

President Bush seemed to agree. During Fox's Sept. 5 visit here, he and Bush committed themselves to an approach that respects "the human dignity of all migrants," regardless of their legal status.

But the U.S. officials said that too many members of Congress believe that any measure that legalizes undocumented aliens would increase U.S. vulnerability to a terrorist attack.

Since Sept. 11, the administration has been making it more difficult for foreigners to enter the country. For Mexicans, this has meant more stringent searches at border crossings.

Visa processes for young men from Arab and Muslim nations have also been delayed to give officials more time to search for evidence of terrorist activities.

Immigration reform has be a high priority for Fox since he took office a year ago. When he met with Bush, Fox challenged him to reach an agreement by the end of the year.

Bush did not embrace the timetable but agreed that a legalization process - short of blanket amnesty - was called for, given the contributions Mexican workers have made to the U.S. economy.

The U.S. and Mexican delegations met for several hours Tuesday at the State Department. The American delegation, led by Assistant Secretary of State for Consular Affairs Mary Ryan, also included Justice and Labor Department officials and immigration officials.

Mexico's delegation was led by Gustavo Mohar, a migration expert at Mexico's Secretariat for External Relations; and Rodolfo Tuiran, who heads Mexico's National Council on Population.

Another meeting will probably be held sometime in January. The officials said the U.S. side wants to keep options open in case political conditions change.

On Monday, a Mexican delegation met with Tom Ridge, the director of homeland security, and other officials to discuss border issues.

AP-ES-11-20-01 1900EST



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last
To: flamefront
Bump
121 posted on 11/21/2001 4:55:46 AM PST by CIBvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken21
san diegans are not going to give up this source of income to please your xenophobia.

Americns should not be required to give up their rights or their safety to enable San Diego's financial schemes.

We "rely" on them here too - and it sucks.

122 posted on 11/21/2001 5:09:22 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ken21

"san diego's largest export partner is mexico."

" san diegans are not going to give up this source of income to please your xenophobia."

Funny, I was stationed there in San Diego for 5 years and I could've sworn it was really the northern most suburb of Mexico City. Thank God I live in some little rednecked American town now! At least we know what we are ... Americans!

123 posted on 11/21/2001 5:14:08 AM PST by Colt .45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: patriciaruth
I happen to speak Spanish, love Mexican food, respect Mexican families and have Latinos for friends, so this is not "racist."

Me too, I have always loved the latin culture, and used to visit Mexico every chance I got. (To drink tequila and eat the food.) Now Mexicans are open with their hatred for the US, this is why Fox could not in good faith support us after Sept 11. (At least with a straight face.)

I applaud this change of heart on the part of the administration (if it is valid) because the immigration policy of Bush is just about the only thing he had campaigned on that I disagree with. We must control who enters with permission to stay, and they must be interested in becoming members of this country.

124 posted on 11/21/2001 5:14:24 AM PST by KC_for_Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: All
I believe our reply to Fox from Mexico should be "What right do you have to criticize our immigration policy"? What have you done to help the people of Mexico to make a living in Mexico instead of the USA? We don't owe the people of Mexico anything...
125 posted on 11/21/2001 7:20:09 AM PST by jtgaff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #126 Removed by Moderator

Comment #127 Removed by Moderator

To: patriciaruth; MadEagle
Thanks for mentioning OIL -- I think it has much to do with the timing of the new position on immigration signaled in the article posted here. But you are WRONG.

You said: Mexico is pumping oil like crazy for us. Why do you think you are paying 80 cents a gallon less for gasoline? This will do more for our economic recovery than a thousand burro patrols. THANK YOU, MEXICO!

No way. Mexico just last week tried to stir up international trouble by asking Russia and Norway join Mexico as non-OPEC members to join in a pledge to cut production in order to solidify OPECs pledge to cut production if others outside OPEC joined. Mexico initiated that action by going to Norway to ask for Russia's involvement in the deal. Now, all of a sudden, Russia is reversing its first offer made at the time Putin was smoozing with Bush in Crawford Texas that kept prices low. (Been to the gas station, lately?) Oil Climbs as Russia Edges Toward Cut. Perhaps Mexico will succeed in sticking the U.S. in the back with its international effort to raise oil prices and cut production.

NO THANK YOU MEXICO!

Mexico is in effect joining OPEC. How does that help the U.S.?

128 posted on 11/21/2001 8:48:09 AM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

Comment #129 Removed by Moderator

To: expose
Good job of providing the facts.

Lies..lies...lies..

130 posted on 11/21/2001 9:11:27 AM PST by Aerial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: expose
Just to clarify...I don't mean it is you who is lying.
131 posted on 11/21/2001 9:12:55 AM PST by Aerial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #132 Removed by Moderator

To: flamefront
So why is it called immigration "reform" when our borders would be weakened, but not when our borders would be strengthed? Why can't the AP give this story something to the effect, "Immigration Reform Could Keep Millions of Illegal Aliens from Breaking Into The US"? Oh yeah...because AP stands for "Accuracy Problem".

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

133 posted on 11/21/2001 9:18:40 AM PST by wku man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maalaea
Regarding that curious website you pointed a link to: Raoul Lowery Contreras RAOUL.NET (BTW its ISP has likemided curious and criminal postings.)

The following is posted Nov. 18th by Contreras:

-- make him an admitted accomplice to a crime. For what it is worth, I sent an email to the San Diego FBI.
134 posted on 11/21/2001 9:23:44 AM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: jerod
"a toilet filled with inbred white boys"

Do you really believe that? If you do, try to compare cultures in the broadest sense. Can you? Regardless, this is a stereotype I am somewhat unfamilliar with. I guess I just have not been straining myself THAT much to look for something negative in what is admittedly my own race.

Builders or destroyers, givers or takers? Who's side are you on?

135 posted on 11/21/2001 9:30:12 AM PST by dead culture watch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

Comment #136 Removed by Moderator

Comment #137 Removed by Moderator

To: trank
*That is their claim the southwest was stolen not mine.

No such thing is claimed. Quit being frightened by fringe groups.
They want jobs that you want filled.

138 posted on 11/21/2001 10:28:34 AM PST by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
what you said!
139 posted on 11/21/2001 11:26:38 AM PST by IRtorqued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #140 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson