Posted on 11/17/2001 10:58:21 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
Saturday, Nov. 17, 2001 11:39 a.m. EST Flight 587 Video Shows 'Puff of Smoke' in Sky A second-by-second videotape of the final moments of doomed American Airlines Flight 587 shows a puff of smoke in the sky seconds after it crashed outside New York's JFK Airport Monday, lending credence to eyewitnesses who say the jetliner exploded before slamming into a Rockaway, N.Y., neighborhood. Though Flight 587 probers have not released the key videotape, shot from a Metropolitan Transportation Authority highway surveillance camera, reporters from New York's Daily News were allowed to view it Friday. "The tape ... shows a white outline of the jetliner against a clear sky in fairly steep decline," the News reported in Saturday editions. "Seconds later, the outline disappears and the video shows a blurry, white, undefined patch as the plane apparently breaks apart." Visible in one of the final frames of the sequential videotape is "a puff of white smoke in the sky." The images of Flight 587's final moments are said to be "very unclear." FBI and NTSB investigators hope to learn more through video enhancement techniques. On Friday, MTA spokesman Tom Kelly told NewsMax.com that the FBI had turned the videotape over to the NTSB, but apparently both agencies now have copies and continue to analyze them. Enhancement of the Flight 587 video could confirm the accounts of eyewitnesses like Jackie Powers, who, minutes after the crash, told both ABC News and WABC Radio in New York that she saw "an enormous flash" near the wing on the A-300 Airbus before it dropped from the sky. "I don't know if it was fire or an explosion," she said. "It appeared that debris fell from the left side [of the plane]. It just plummeted. It had no momentum whatsoever. It just plummeted." Dozens of other witnesses told various media outlets they saw the jet either explode or catch fire before it crashed. An explosion would be a problem for NTSB officials, who spent the better part of the last few days trying to sell the idea that the plane's vertical stabilizer snapped off, causing the in-flight breakup, because of "wake turbulence" from a Japan Airlines 747 that had taken off from JFK two minutes earlier. Independent aviation experts have generally scoffed at the NTSB theory. "[747 wake turbulence] is not strong enough to be able to break off a tail or to compromise any sort of a normal airplane," said ABC News aviation analyst John Nance on Friday. "They could turn a little airplane upside down. But especially an A-300, which is a jumbo jet - no way in the world should that ever have any potentially disastrous impact on the aircraft or the tail," he explained. On Wednesday, an unnamed aviation expert quoted in New York's Newsday said one likely explanation for Flight 587's breakup was a bomb exploding on board. (See: Aviation Expert: Bomb One Likely Cause of Flight 587 Crash.)
Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:
TWA 800
War on Terrorism
I tried that once - all I ended up with was a crappy song I wrote called "Let's invade Berkely"... I decided that Bitter Aggression was not my forte'... ;0)
Yes, the manufacturer was able to fix the circuits which read the data. The NTSB has the data, but the FDR data cuts off well before the CVR recordings. Of course that in itself tells you there was trama to the tail area. If only some of the data cut off early, you'd guess that signal/data cables from some areas were damaged, but others were still functioning. If it all cuts off, the damage must be close to the FDR, or even to the FDR itself. They, NTSB have said the data shows a .3 g lateral accelleration, first to one side then to the other, which could be consistent with several different scenarios.
Yes, exactly. But, I fear the greater problem: not admitting a security breach. How can security breaches be fixed if "they don't exist?"
Sorry, but I havn't seen very many of those lately, and needed my fix... ;0)
If the aircraft yawed violently to the left, the VS would be 'snapped' off to the left. Also, in the event of horzontal shear, with the tail ripped off, I'm not sure what the yaw axis is, and whether 'wind' force from the side would yaw a tail-less A300 right or left. Not sure anyone knows.
It's actually much, much worse than that. The effects spread instantly past just the airline industry to the whole US (and world) economy.
One, just one anthrax incident at a mall would essentially end the holiday shopping season. On top of a depressed economy, the effects would be catastrophic.
Another lie created by conspiracy nuts. And before you say differently, why don't you provide your source for that statement and somewhere to read the witness accounts.
Those who saw the TWA 800 get hit have never gotten over it. It's like a bullet to their brain.
So, what's the sanity of a few hundred people if it aids the economy, eh?
What if some of you folks had seen it, and nobody believed you?
So there are lots of possibile explanations. I remember posts early on stating that the engines being thrown off was proof of a bomb or missile.
Use your search engine. Ready for an education on flight TWA 800?
Or visa versa! It may do the opposite as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.