[Wm Bach]

It's even more disgusting than that. The psychological techique of placing the Constitution alongside all those whackjob Klukers sets up a subconcious reflex so that anytime someone mentions the Constitution, they think of Klukers. Welcome to PSYOPS 101.

[11B3]

Bingo! It seems that Clinton's domestic law enforcement agenda continues through his holdovers. They've moved along from the militia and now are targeting ALL of us.....

[zog]

--bingo-rama, you got it. Question authority, you are a terrorist. Want to see a return of the english languge in law, you are a terrorist.

Remember the old historical criteria for becoming a fibber agent, you had to be either a lawyer or an accountant. Which then translates to you had to professionaly have an interest in "legalese" as the official language, not english, and in making your money off of convulted tax code mostly. And it's the commerce clause and the tax code that really dictates how this executive branch dictated government works in reality, and why they are terrified of english language constituional law advocates. The separation of powers is the biggest scam running.

So, the lawcountants done jern up into this scam, and get given a gun and a badge and a license to break the law to make sure that those aspects of "life' remain paramount.

Money, control, accumulation of power, it's always the same old song and dance with dictatorships once they start down that path, and always couched in extreme terms, you either support the king/dictator or you are a rebel worthy of persecution and destruction. The sad part is the sheer numbers of people who willingly see political reality this way, who seem to think their particular latest king has this magical exception to the rule that he isn't despotic, that it's only the "other king" and his court that are the despots, when in reality it matters little which little dictator kinglet appears to be in charge, it's the entrenched royal retinue that never changes year in and year out that is "in charge" and you NEVER get to 'vote" on those gents.

[Travis McGee]

They have already taken an honorable word from the Bill of Rights and made it a synonym for terrorist: militia.

Now "defenders of the constitution" are suspects for domestic terrorism?

If this pamphlet is not a joke, we are in deep trouble, because millions of us who swore an oath to "defend the constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC" will not disregard that oath.

If there is not a better prescription for the causing of a civil war I can't think of it. LEOs and FLEOs are asked both to take an oath to defend the constitution, and regard defenders of the constittion as potential terrorists.

The seeds of a real conflict are seen in this pamphlet, because today under the so-called "Patriot Act of 2001" (anti terrorism law just passed 99-1) suspects in terrorism cases fall into a category which takes away most of their civil rights and due process protections.