Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
Yes, that is very bizarre, that the tail, which seemed undamaged, fell off FIRST.
That seems to be the part that all the "anti-conspiracy" Freepers prefer to overlook.
183 posted on 11/13/2001 7:24:29 AM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]


To: EggsAckley; OLDWORD
A lot of people have made comments on what fell off when, and where it wound up. If an engine was lost, and its turbine tore itself apart (regardless of what caused the engine failure itselt -- birds, metalugical failure, sabotage), the flying blades could have escaped the containment cowling. (This has happened before.)

The flying blades then cause damage to whatever they hit, including the tail, the wing, and the fuel tank inside the wing. The damaged engine (or the more damaged engine, if both took a bird strike) falls off the airplane.

You then have two falling parts, the engine and the piece of the tail. Both are moving forward at 200 MPH at the moemnt they come off the plane. Which one will hit the ground at a point closer to the runway? Most likely the tail section.

Do a thought experiment, as Einstein called it. The engine is now basically a rock. The tail section, however, is still an airfoil with a large surface. Momentum will carry the engine forward as it falls. Air resistance will bring the tail section to a halt in the forward direction so it stops moving forward, and falls straight to the ground.

Imagine throwing a metal ball and an aluminum pizza tray at the same time at 200 MPH. The ball will travel farther forward than the tray, though the tray will take longer to hit the ground because wind resistence slows it on the way down, as well as stopping its forward momentum. Got the picture?

The fact that the upright section of the tail wound up in Jamaica Bay and the engine wound up in Rockaway, does not lead to any conclusions about how this aircraft was destroyed. It only demonstrates the difference between the descent of a compact, heavy object and a lighter-weight, large-surface area object from an altitude of 2,000 feet.

I'm just putting in laymen's terms a vigorous discussion of physics from yesterday's main thread. Trust me on this. I was a physics major at Yale until I realized that liberal arts majors had dates on weekends, drank beer, and had lives.

Congressman Billybob

278 posted on 11/13/2001 8:36:35 AM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson