Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fuel Dump Inconsistent with Lack of Distress Call
copycat's litter box ^ | 11/12/01 | copycat

Posted on 11/12/2001 1:40:55 PM PST by copycat

The latest from government bureaucrats like Pataki, and their willing accomplices here at FR is that "Since the pilot dumped his fuel, it must have been an accident."

Unfortunately for those who would argue this theory, we have already learned that there were NO distress calls or unusual communications of any kind.

Pilots wwould dump fuel if they had a mechanical failure and planned to return to the airport. What are the odds that a pilot would dump his fuel and NOT decide to inform the tower of his decision? (Corollary question...How easy is it to radio the tower of trouble?)

In addition, eyewitness accounts clearly state that the right wing of the plane was seen to explode and take out the tail. An accident? I think not...


TOPICS: Editorial; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-211 next last
To: tarpon_bill
the A300 CAN'T dump fuel. It is not possible with that model of aircraft.
41 posted on 11/12/2001 2:02:53 PM PST by freeasinbeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
The mechnical failure involved an electrical problem, making it impossible for the pilot to contact the tower.

IMHO, you're reaching just as far as I am.

42 posted on 11/12/2001 2:03:40 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

Comment #43 Removed by Moderator

To: MarkWar
Having fired the GAU-2B during daylight, and watched fuel dumps from various angles relative to the sun, I can attest that a minigun burst looks a LOT different from a fuel dump.
44 posted on 11/12/2001 2:05:09 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: tarpon_bill
Dumping fuel would be the first response to any onboard emergency.

A fully fueled plane can't land safely with all the fuel on-board. Too heavy.

The fuel dump story has been debunked. Chances are the fuel in Jamaica bay came from the detached engine and/or wing.

45 posted on 11/12/2001 2:05:43 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: copycat
I'VE GOT IT! I'VE GOT IT!

Pilot begins dumping fuel. Copilot informs pilot you cannot dump fuel on an A300.

Pilot says "then what is this lever?"

Copilot says "That's the emergency engine release..."

That was just BEFORE the stinger missile fired by a right wing, pro-life militia member hit the plane.

Details at 11:00...

46 posted on 11/12/2001 2:05:49 PM PST by mfulstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: copycat
The pilot probably dumped the fuel in order to minimize the inferno on the ground. What dumping fuel may have to do with a mechanical problem is not clear to me.
47 posted on 11/12/2001 2:08:36 PM PST by Fulbright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: copycat
You're good. Nice original thinking...
48 posted on 11/12/2001 2:08:53 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: copycat
I said the same thing to my co-worker this afternoon when II heard that there was a fuel dump. No distress call but he dumps his fuel. Something fishy there. I hope Bush doesn't let the FBI and FAA pull a TWA Flight 800 here.
49 posted on 11/12/2001 2:09:08 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Cornhusker
Believe it or not, not every action taken by our government and or our airlines is not a conspiracy. Sometimes things jsut happen, such as accidents and mistakes that dont seem to be easily understood. What benifit do we have now to cover up or take part in an airline crash?

The tin foil hat crowd will see a conspiracy in everything. They will not believe that some things are just accidental. I don't know what happened, we will just have to wait and see. I'm not going to believe an MSNBC resident expert for goodness sake, they have about as good a track record as the tin foil hat crowd.

BTW, nice handle. It must be hard to be a husker fan in Texas. It could be worse, I guess you could be a husker fan in Oklahoma. I'm in Omaha.

50 posted on 11/12/2001 2:10:49 PM PST by pchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: All
There was an article on page one of the January 2, 2001 edition of the Wall Street Journal about major problems with General Electric's CF-6 engines. Somebody probably should look it up and post it.
51 posted on 11/12/2001 2:11:24 PM PST by Fulbright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Texas Cornhusker
What benifit do we have now to cover up or take part in an airline crash?

The same benefit they had when they were two stepping all around the Anthrax letters. Trying to avoid a panic. Can't let the dirty mob know what's really going on. Thinking like that got two postal workers killed. The Airlines and the gov't want to do everything possible to keep the public flying through the holidays.

52 posted on 11/12/2001 2:12:37 PM PST by pgkdan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
Thanks, I needed that...
53 posted on 11/12/2001 2:14:09 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: mfulstone
Best theory I've heard all day!
54 posted on 11/12/2001 2:14:19 PM PST by Sender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: copycat
If they did have a major engine failure/explosion 2-3 mins after takeoff, the resonably low altitude would not give them much time at all to start emergency procedures, call on radio, etc. The pilot whould inact all emergency procedures to regain control of the aircraft before thinking of calling it in. If it was an engine explosion or separation that ruptured the wing or fuselage, the aircraft would have certainly went out of control, with the pilots occupied trying to regain it. Losing an engine would instantly throw off the weight of the aircraft, not to mention the instant yaw from only having thrust on one side of the plane. At a cruising altitude and speedthere is time to try to recover. At a lower altitude 5000-6000 ft, that would only leave a few seconds to try to accomplish this, made more difficut by having less airspeed. Losing radio contact in this situation is not so extraodinary because of the lack of time. It would be like you having a tire blow out on your car and going into a spin, your first reaction is to gain control of the vehicle, not call your wife and tell her your spinning.

Just my 2 cents

55 posted on 11/12/2001 2:15:06 PM PST by Uni-Poster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
The same benefit they had when they were two stepping all around the Anthrax letters. Trying to avoid a panic.

Anthrax info was trickled out one drop at a time, one drop a day over three weeks in an effort to minimize panic.

The Fedgov has a motive to minimize today's happenings. Any further hits to the airline industry could really hurt the US economy.

If I were in their shoes, I may do the same thing.

56 posted on 11/12/2001 2:16:16 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Patria One
I haven't heard anything about a distress call. Is it possible there was one?

You're the pilot. You make the call when you have time. No one is there to save you but yourself, and no one is coming to help. Any call is after you get all your pressing business completed and have a moment to spare.

57 posted on 11/12/2001 2:16:28 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Uni-Poster
If they did have a major engine failure/explosion 2-3 mins after takeoff, the resonably low altitude would not give them much time at all to start emergency procedures, call on radio, etc.

I am under the impression that radioing the tower of a Mayday is as easy as opening your mouth and speaking. That is why I asked how easy it is to communicate. Perhaps someone will address that question soon.

58 posted on 11/12/2001 2:18:19 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: pchuck
They will not believe that some things are just accidental.

There is a Jihad declared against America. The ostriches don't want to believe it yet.

59 posted on 11/12/2001 2:19:25 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
Makes absolute sense to me. Thank you.

Is there a fuel jettison rate for large aircraft?

Also wondering if the plane was really delayed for an hour because there were engine problems.

Haven't kept up except piecemeal.

60 posted on 11/12/2001 2:19:35 PM PST by Patria One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-211 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson