Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Patali: Pilot of AA flight dumped fuel prior to crash, in (likely) response to mechanical failures
Gov. Pataki | 11/12/01 | WABC Radio

Posted on 11/12/2001 12:18:32 PM PST by Steven W.

Gov. Pataki is reporting that the pilot of the ill-fated American Airlines flight dumped most of the airplane's fuel over Jamaica Bay, anticipating a crash landing and most likely indicating a trained response to onboard mechanical failures.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aaflight587; flight587
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-362 next last
To: Steven W.
The fuel left floating on the surface of the bay

Oh no where is Green Peace and the rest of the environmental wackos? I'm sure they will be devastated over all the possible dead fish and seaguls in Jamaica Bay. Then PETA would get involved.

Just a little comical relief.

21 posted on 11/12/2001 12:26:57 PM PST by Dengar01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: Steven W.
The fuel left floating on the surface of the bay

Which could be caused by the disintegration of the wing. Pataki is jumping to conclusions.

23 posted on 11/12/2001 12:27:15 PM PST by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Stevieboy
Contaminated fuel?

Unlikely to have an explosive effect. More likely to just starve the engine.

24 posted on 11/12/2001 12:27:18 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dead
It's right up there with the moose and cheese posts, ain't it?
25 posted on 11/12/2001 12:27:22 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage
He had just taken off, hardly enough time. Pitaki doesn't know.

Pataki may not know. But a "veteran captain," Ben Tillman, was just on MSNBC and said that fuel can be dumped at any time, and that fuel spewing out of the plane could have been a compromised fuel line which could result from a catastrophic engine failure, or could, indeed, have been the pilot dumping fuel.

26 posted on 11/12/2001 12:27:57 PM PST by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
I've used to write ATA-100 Flight Manuals for a living. They didn't have time to dump fuel on purpose. However, if a wing, or part of a wing broke over the water, fuel would have been spilled out.

/john

27 posted on 11/12/2001 12:28:12 PM PST by JRandomFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Shale
.... I'm surprised that I havent heard anything from Gore? Has anyone else? Am I just missing something

You won't be hearing from Mr. Gore today; all the newspapers that endorsed him have said that Mr. Bush won fair and square. Gore is today pondering what to do next with his life -- because he will NOT be a nominee again.

28 posted on 11/12/2001 12:28:13 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: longleaf
When was Gov. Pataki appointed to the NTSB? What is his source for this?

none other than California Gov. Gray-out Davis.

Amazing how these gov's know everything.

30 posted on 11/12/2001 12:29:24 PM PST by Clovis_Skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
People are saying mechanical failure this and mechanical failure that. Of course it was a mechanical failure. Even if a bomb goes off on the plane the result would be a mechanical failure.

The question isn't whether or not the plane crash was the result of a mechanical failure. It obviously was. The question is was the mechanical failure the result of improper maintenance, an act of God, or deliberate sabotage.

I suspect it will take quite a while to learn the truth about this (if ever.) In the meantime I think that the safest assumption is that it was a deliberate act of sabotage.

31 posted on 11/12/2001 12:29:31 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
It's right up there with the moose and cheese posts, ain't it?

Move along. No cheese here. Nothing to see. Ignore that moose, which did not bite a hole in the engine."

I think it adds to the effect, don't you?

32 posted on 11/12/2001 12:30:09 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Shale
I'm surprised that I havent heard anything from Gore?

I'm not. Hard for Gore to talk with a Big Mac and a Quarter Pounder with Cheese stuffed in his mouth, not to mention the box of jumbo fries and two slices of pepperoni pizza left over from breakfast.

33 posted on 11/12/2001 12:30:27 PM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Clinton's a rapist
Has she found out a way to blame it on the Bush tax cut yet?

I was actually looking for that a couple of hours ago. It's surprising she hasn't yet done so. It would be so consistent with her "clap trap."

34 posted on 11/12/2001 12:30:55 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
I think we should all look at this suspiciously. The hits on the WTC showed that these guys did their homework. They knew where to hit the building to weaken its structure. Is it such a stretch to think that they may have sabotaged airplanes to fail at some later point in time(by extensive studying of the planes) by compromising a critical part of an airplane.

They did find mechanic ID's on some of them didn't they?

35 posted on 11/12/2001 12:31:15 PM PST by June2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: right_to_defend
Exactly! Pataki is making a fool of himself, grandstanding and talking through his hat.
36 posted on 11/12/2001 12:31:16 PM PST by Palladin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Faith_j
Just one possiblity. Obviously, the reports coming in from official sources are continuing to conflict with one another.

Worth repeating.

Bump

37 posted on 11/12/2001 12:31:31 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Faith_j
This wouldn't make sense since the pilot did not call back to the tower

Possibly, but if he decided to dump fuel, he may not have thought the problem was an emergency just yet, but he may have decided to return to the airport, hence the earliest possible fuel dumping action. In this speculation, he didn't get around to the radio call before the engine blew.

38 posted on 11/12/2001 12:31:42 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: steveo
Wasn't the flight only a few minutes old at the time of the crash?

NTSB reported that the plane took off at 9:13 and crashed at 9:17.
Four minutes is an awfully short time to develop "mechanical troubles" AND dump fuel. JMHO.

39 posted on 11/12/2001 12:32:00 PM PST by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Steven W.
The fuel left floating on the surface of the bay

Would that be the same fuel that was spilling out of the wing as it fell into the bay???

40 posted on 11/12/2001 12:32:06 PM PST by is_is
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 361-362 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson