Posted on 11/09/2001 1:33:50 PM PST by Fearless Flyers
It's the way the military, civil servants working for the military, and to a lessor extent some military contracters, write dates. Although it would be more common to spell or abreviate the month, (9 November 2001 or 9 Nov 01, etc) but I've seen the all numbers version more often the last few years. I've got to the point where I always spell out or abreviate the month just to avoid confusion. I.E. is 11-09-01, the 9th of November or the 11th of September....ooh hadn't noticed that about today's date. :)
I guess voters in Miami-Dade and Broward are off the hook.
the "box lettering" and
the peculiar slant of the lettering (Arabic is a left-to-right written language, of course),
the use of the European-Middle Eastern for m of the number "1" and
the idiomatic awkwardness of his language ("can not" vs. "cannot"),
all suggest a possible to likely Middle East/ Arabic-language, non-US raised citizen tie.
slashes of both kinds are used in directory and regexps... hypenating dates makes life a little easier for the programmer...
also it is easier for the programmer to put a 0 in front of the month or the day that is less than 10... presumably many programmers have worked with applications using dates and find it easier to do a 6 or 8 digit string... like today would be 11092001... a 1192001 would be unreadable by the computer
programmers also probably have had a lot of grief working with the lowercase l and the number 1... it wouldn't surprise me if the guy puts a slash inside the number zero, either for readability. I do that myself sometimes.
as for the block handwriting... he may just have been covering up his regular handwriting by writing in all caps.
Of course, if he was a Fortran programmer he probably would have used the anthrax against himself to end his misery. LOL!
Maybe they did it as a trick, sometimes a criminal actually doesn't want someone else to get "the credit" for doing what he did. Chances are the guy behind this thinks he's brilliant (a brilliant Arab) and will put out a few hints to make sure the wrong people aren't given the credit.
The third letter is different from the first two in content and the handwriting looks smaller. Were the first two letters published prior to the third being sent out? Could the person who sent the third letter have seen a photo of the others in a newspaper and imitated style and handwriting, then added his 2 cents?
WANTED
Good reasoning of his id as a native. The rest of your profile strayed when you extrapolated w/o considering some facts. There's the fact the guy produced the slime. You need to consider what it would take in knowledge and equipment. He's a chemist/chem engineer, or related. It takes that kind of knowledge and most importantly, understanding that knowledge, to make a good slime. He also picked the nastiest standard bug. It's somewhat resistant to penicillin. He's definitly got a degree and a long time in industry. He's not a technician. This guy's got a high enough position that he is free to operate in the facilities w/o folks questioning what he's up to. If he only has a BS degree he's an old guy, about to retire. Else he's a little younger and has a higher degree.
Somehow he obtained the Ames bug. So he's got clout, or works/has access to antibiotic testing, or R&D. Else someone going over the PO's would ask, "what the hell's the anthrax for?" He bypassed supervision.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.