To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
It is the lack of any ability to do anything but say "I'm right, you're wrong..." You're not one of those types, and I don't consider myself one of those types, but you have to admit that the pro-Harry side certainly does its share of religion (i.e. Christain) baiting. You can form your own judgement regarding which side is worse.
To: Aquinasfan
No doubt there, I just want to try to reach some sort of consensus on what is and is not acceptable forms of debate on this issue. Those who have been around know what JimRob will do to any threads on the subject if the flaming and "arguing" get out of hand with no real debate going on. This is a discussion forum, and while debate is a legitimate form of discussion, flame wars and long threads without anything but {Post 198} "Is so" {Post 199} "Is not" {Post 200} "Is so" is a waste of bandwidth.
Soon, however, the focus of the Hollywood propaganda machine will focus on LoTR and away from Harry Potter, and we can all relax a bit.
To: Aquinasfan
You're not one of those types, and I don't consider myself one of those types, but you have to admit that the pro-Harry side certainly does its share of religion (i.e. Christain) baiting. I'll just let this one hang out there in the breeze a bit.
129 posted on
11/13/2001 6:30:52 AM PST by
OWK
To: Aquinasfan; jjbrouwer
Well cover me in honey and call me Shirly another Harry Potter thread, just what we need.
Cheers Tony
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson