Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PhiKapMom
Listen carefully about what he said about the Federal role in airport security.
8 posted on 11/08/2001 7:22:47 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Having been around the AF for more years than I care to admit, I would think it would be similar to other contracts the AF or any Government agency lets out where they are in charge but the people doing the work are employees of the contractors.

They have several words for different types of contracts like outsourcing and privatization but in both the Government is still in charge and contractors bid for the work. That means contractors and employees can be fired a lot more easily than if they were Civil Service.

The FAA here in OKC has a lot of contractor employees working for them and the contract is rebid every few years. In fact, they just changed contractors not that long ago. FAA is in charge and the contractor provides a lot of employees with expertise that the Government doesn't have or would be too expensive to have that many civil service workers.

It is my understanding that this is what the President is talking about when he refers to federalizing airport security -- contractor employees being supervised under a contract with the Federal Government. This would allow employees to be fired and also to have the same standards in each airport in the Country instead of different procedures at each airport. When a company would bid the contract they would have to follow certain guidelines.

15 posted on 11/08/2001 7:40:21 PM PST by PhiKapMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson