Howlin ... I'm a total grunt who's spent the last 11 years doing my penance for not going to law school by taking legal jobs in between circus jobs.
I have every respect for what you do ... it still doesn't make you the be-all and end-all authority of whether or not Klayman's an ambulance chaser.
I realize you think he's a smarmy shyster. Fine. Everyone's entitled to their personal opinion.
I'm just asking that -- having clearly established your contempt for the man -- you restrict your "expert" opinion to analyses of the facts.
If I came on every thread only to say "I've been hanging around politicians all my adult life and I KNOW George Bush to be a consummate liar", I'm sure you'd have some problems with that.
You'd accuse me of never having met the man in person, being prejudiced against him just because he believes in taking our money to perpetuate use of the unborn like mulch and ... my personal favorite ... just plain HATING the guy.
That's why I avoid those pitfalls as best I can by buttressing my attacks with the FACTS on which I base my opinions.
Your facts seems to be: Larry was okay while he was dogging Clinton but now that he's targeted Republicans and garnered the ire of "OUR" state department (as they protect Janet Reno), he's an ambulance-chasing shyster.
For all I know, you may well be proven correct one day. You won't get there by sliming the guy, though.
I've already handed you what I think is your best strategem for proving Klayman a fraud. Why don't you run with that?
I guess your view of the facts and my view of the facts are different; the facts are, regardless of how you dress them up, Larry Klayman has milked his supporters for over 30 million dollars in the last two years, and has spent less than 2 million dollars on investigation and legal expenses.
If I came on every thread only to say "I've been hanging around politicians all my adult life and I KNOW George Bush to be a consummate liar", I'm sure you'd have some problems with that.
Leaving out the part about you saying you hang around politicans, you do that very thing. I've SEEN your web site. Evidently what you do is collect ever fact you see that can possibly be twisted and spun into being detrimental to the Bush family and post it as the gospel according to Askel.
BTW, you've NEVER seen me say Klayman was all right as long as he was going after Clinton. He's lawsuits, regardless of whoever they are against, are bogus. And that is EXACTLY what I've been saying since the very beginning. You know, back when it was just a few of us saying it; not like now, when the positions have changed and there are only a few of "you." I guess we just saw the light sooner than you did.