I guess your view of the facts and my view of the facts are different; the facts are, regardless of how you dress them up, Larry Klayman has milked his supporters for over 30 million dollars in the last two years, and has spent less than 2 million dollars on investigation and legal expenses.
If I came on every thread only to say "I've been hanging around politicians all my adult life and I KNOW George Bush to be a consummate liar", I'm sure you'd have some problems with that.
Leaving out the part about you saying you hang around politicans, you do that very thing. I've SEEN your web site. Evidently what you do is collect ever fact you see that can possibly be twisted and spun into being detrimental to the Bush family and post it as the gospel according to Askel.
BTW, you've NEVER seen me say Klayman was all right as long as he was going after Clinton. He's lawsuits, regardless of whoever they are against, are bogus. And that is EXACTLY what I've been saying since the very beginning. You know, back when it was just a few of us saying it; not like now, when the positions have changed and there are only a few of "you." I guess we just saw the light sooner than you did.
Thank you Howlin for stating what I have been claiming about you for a long time. You do see NO MERIT in ANY of the work of Klayman, even though it was Judicial Watch which provided us with most of what we know about Chinagate, Filegate and Emailgate. Your statement either means you haven't a clue what Klayman was trying to do using depositions and subpoenas in CIVIL cases to find out information about CRIMINAL activities by the democRATS (and I don't think you are that ignorant) ... or you would rather we had remained in the dark about those criminal activities. And the latter is an attitude that ONLY a democRAT would have had back in 1996 (because there were no "new" Republican's back then).
Face it Howlin, you are busted.
You don't believe Ron Brown was murdered because you are a democRAT. You don't believe Linda Tripp's testimony in Filegate because you are a democRAT. You argue like a democRAT because you are a democRAT. You are chummy with so many others on this forum who act like democRATS because you are a democRAT. And you don't like Klayman, now or EVER, because you are a democRAT.