According to Klayman, some of them still are. If you can prove otherwise, then by all means do so.
Now answer my question ... were any of those cases "LAUGHED" out of court? You are DISHONESTLY trying to suggest the cases had no merit. You are also DISHONESTLY trying to suggest that the only reason for filing the cases was the matter at hand. That is not true. These cases were the ONLY means available, in a country where the DOJ and FBI were owned by the democRATS, of putting certain people under oath and asking them certain questions about the activities of democRATS. Klayman expertly used those depositions and document searches to uncover a number of CRIMINAL (not CIVIL) violations by the Clintons, Clinton administration and DNC. Now explain why Bush/Ashcroft haven't done ANYTHING about the many serious CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS that JW gathered facts about? Are they cowering before the dreaded DC Juries and the mainstream media reaction?
You are such a predictable parrot.
You even argue like a democRAT. Again. Why do you go out of your way to try and discredit EVERYTHING that Judicial Watch did during the Clinton years? Why do you want Bush/Ashcroft to "move on" when there is significant reason to believe the democRATS committed just about every class of crime you can name? How can you imagine that would be good for this country.
Or perhaps you can just tell us your reasons for believing that Ron Brown was not murdered and that people who suggest he was (or that Foster didn't suicide) give the GOP a "bad name"?
Sort of like the case back this summer that Klayman kept saying was still in court and others were saying that it had been dismissed.........and the others were right?